http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/e743f2a4-5918-11e3-9798-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2m5pQ4afk
That's OK, Israel will disassemble it for you.
That's OK, Israel will disassemble it for you.
Israel has went it alone in 1948, 1956, 1967 (won in 6 days), and 1973. No, they will give Obama the finger for tossing them under the bus. He's been the most anti-Israel POTUS ever unless you count Carter's actions since leaving office. Israel will make a smoking crater out of the entire country of Iran and Iran needs to understand that. They aren't going to wait until another holocaust happens with nukes this time instead of gas chambers and concentration camps.Chrissy wrote:ill be surprised if Israel goes it alone. and our red lines mean nothing.
well as I have said before, if they do I support their decision. I know as a American I would not tolerate the shit they have had to.PACEDOG#1 wrote:Israel has went it alone in 1948, 1956, 1967 (won in 6 days), and 1973. No, they will give Obama the finger for tossing them under the bus. He's been the most anti-Israel POTUS ever unless you count Carter's actions since leaving office. Israel will make a smoking crater out of the entire country of Iran and Iran needs to understand that. They aren't going to wait until another holocaust happens with nukes this time instead of gas chambers and concentration camps.Chrissy wrote:ill be surprised if Israel goes it alone. and our red lines mean nothing.
Israel and Saudi Arabia are talking about a joint attack.Chrissy wrote:ill be surprised if Israel goes it alone. and our red lines mean nothing.
Yes, as Benjamin Netanyahu said and it is all so true and well phrased.ZVUGKTUBM wrote:PaceDog has been longing for a war with Iran for years. I am glad our President has called it the way he has.
It is unfortunate that PaceDog is all for cutting off the world's oil supplies through the Straits of Hormuz and driving the price of oil to heights never seen before. That is exactly what Israel's attack on Iran will do. And afterward, he will be whining incessantly--likely blaming President Obama--about how expensive gasoline is for his motorcycle.
FAIL
the only thing peaceful about your diplomatic solution is that its basically a do nothing solution while iran continues to work on becoming a nuclear armed state. after that I doubt the do nothing approach will be very effective or peaceful.ZVUGKTUBM wrote:So sad that pee-dog/KarlRove and Chrissy think that a peaceful, diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear crisis is bad news.
They define myopia......
Like I said..... You define myopia.....Chrissy wrote:the only thing peaceful about your diplomatic solution is that its basically a do nothing solution while iran continues to work on becoming a nuclear armed state. after that I doubt the do nothing approach will be very effective or peaceful.ZVUGKTUBM wrote:So sad that pee-dog/KarlRove and Chrissy think that a peaceful, diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear crisis is bad news.
They define myopia......
you define "nothing"ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Like I said..... You define myopia.....Chrissy wrote:the only thing peaceful about your diplomatic solution is that its basically a do nothing solution while iran continues to work on becoming a nuclear armed state. after that I doubt the do nothing approach will be very effective or peaceful.ZVUGKTUBM wrote:So sad that pee-dog/KarlRove and Chrissy think that a peaceful, diplomatic solution to the Iranian nuclear crisis is bad news.
They define myopia......
Progressive gullibility never ceases to amaze me.2seaoat wrote:Yep Chrissy but libtards think they know it all
I do think I know enough to know that the size of the Iranian nation, and the vast mountain ranges have allowed them 25 years to harden their development areas. How do you propose without the United States involvement to take out this diverse sites? How do you propose to do this without civilian deaths? If you are suggesting a nuclear response, how will Israel ever be safe from the same in the form of a dirty bomb or nuclear bomb?
I think it is time for you to explain how Israel without American boots on the ground is going to solve this puzzle? Am I wrong to care about American interests first? I so not want ground troops in Iran. I do not want a nuclear response......even if it is tactical weapons aimed at nuclear facilities. It will forever condemn Israel. Diplomacy Pace is not some smug liberal thing.....it is the only intelligent response once America declares their autonomy from Israel's foreign policy. I want a safe Israel and peace in the middle east. I do not want Israel or its citizens to be at risk. I simply think they are at greater risk dropping bombs than finding diplomatic solutions.
Not a prayer.2seaoat wrote:You still did not answer the question? Do you believe dropping bombs will solve the problem?
I agree the economic sanctions were working, but real peace is a democracy in Iran where the people take their country back. We are on the path to that goal. Hurting women and children with economic sanctions without diplomacy is foolish. In six months......if you are right.....the economic sanctions return.
No one WANTS America to fail. The problem is that is what happens when a Democrat is at the helm as you say.ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Progressive gullibility never ceases to amaze me.
Wingnut gullibility runs deep. They show it daily on this forum with their fulminations over Barrack Obama's diplomatic successes. Why do these wingnuts want America to fail when a Democrat is at the helm?
Go to page : 1, 2
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum