Good!
I say make it 600%
People want medicaid payments to be reduced and government spending on health care to be reduced, yet when policies will actually cover health care costs and not have the dime on the taxpayer, we are crying because people have to pay for the coverage.
If a person with the health insurance Bob described, had a major lung or open heart surgery, and the bill was 300k of which they only paid 50k which is happening hundreds of times every day under the inadequate and basically fraudulent polices, ultimately the hospital or the taxpayer takes the hit. Or incrementally the costs are shifted to the insured and we get the double digit inflation in health care costs.
Please look at the website and how they make their money. It is just this poison and lies which continue to attack government and challenge our democratically elected representatives with what alternative? First, tell us what the first policy covered and second tell us what the new policy covers? If you are going to post lies and deception, do not expect concessions to the same. Yes, the president should have let Americans with inadequate insurance where hospitals, taxpayers, and insured people were picking up their deadbeat balance that in order to attack the rise in health care costs, folks must have a minimum policy just like it is required to have a minimum liability policy to drive a car. To post an article and say that a person liability coverage is only $1,000 and the state of Florida mandated coverage to $25,000, and then to only say the percentage of increase of the policy without going through the policy comparison is simply more of the same bias that makes democratically elected government out as evil. There is evil in the air for sure.