Is everyone tired of the political gun ownership debate?
Pensacola Discussion Forum
Is everyone tired of the political gun debate?
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Who starts most of the gun threads? PaceDog. Then he bumps them up to the top when they are ignored.
PACEDOG#1 wrote:ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Who starts most of the gun threads? PaceDog. Then he bumps them up to the top when they are ignored.
Wrong answer LT. You guys harp on it more than I.
When people stop trying to take our guns, then the rest of us will SHUT THE HECK UP.
Ghost_Rider1 wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Who starts most of the gun threads? PaceDog. Then he bumps them up to the top when they are ignored.
Wrong answer LT. You guys harp on it more than I.
When people stop trying to take our guns, then the rest of us will SHUT THE HECK UP.
Show me where any proposed legislation currently on the table will "take away our guns".
bluemoon wrote:I'm tired of the debate and ready for the vote. I can't imagine why anyone would oppose background checks for gun owners. A four year old just shot a 6 year old a day or so ago. I'm tired of gun owners who are not responsible. Most are, I know that, but some are not. If the kid who shot the babies in Newtown had a responsible mother, there would have been no shootings.
PACEDOG#1 wrote:bluemoon wrote:I'm tired of the debate and ready for the vote. I can't imagine why anyone would oppose background checks for gun owners. A four year old just shot a 6 year old a day or so ago. I'm tired of gun owners who are not responsible. Most are, I know that, but some are not. If the kid who shot the babies in Newtown had a responsible mother, there would have been no shootings.
How does a background check presume responsibility? Tell me. This ought to be interesting. The only thing a background check can do is see if you have a criminal record. That is why criminals do not buy guns where background checks are performed.
bluemoon wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:bluemoon wrote:I'm tired of the debate and ready for the vote. I can't imagine why anyone would oppose background checks for gun owners. A four year old just shot a 6 year old a day or so ago. I'm tired of gun owners who are not responsible. Most are, I know that, but some are not. If the kid who shot the babies in Newtown had a responsible mother, there would have been no shootings.
How does a background check presume responsibility? Tell me. This ought to be interesting. The only thing a background check can do is see if you have a criminal record. That is why criminals do not buy guns where background checks are performed.
I know you won't agree, but a background check should also ask if a gun buyer has ever been treated for mental illness. This isn't the wild west anymore.
If you think you need your gun to protect yourself against your democratically elected government, you've got some screws loose somewhere. Guns should be for hunting and home protection. No one wants to take yours away if you are a stable, responsible person.
Paranoid lunatics and criminals don't need guns.
William wrote:bluemoon wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:bluemoon wrote:I'm tired of the debate and ready for the vote. I can't imagine why anyone would oppose background checks for gun owners. A four year old just shot a 6 year old a day or so ago. I'm tired of gun owners who are not responsible. Most are, I know that, but some are not. If the kid who shot the babies in Newtown had a responsible mother, there would have been no shootings.
How does a background check presume responsibility? Tell me. This ought to be interesting. The only thing a background check can do is see if you have a criminal record. That is why criminals do not buy guns where background checks are performed.
I know you won't agree, but a background check should also ask if a gun buyer has ever been treated for mental illness. This isn't the wild west anymore.
If you think you need your gun to protect yourself against your democratically elected government, you've got some screws loose somewhere. Guns should be for hunting and home protection. No one wants to take yours away if you are a stable, responsible person.
Paranoid lunatics and criminals don't need guns.
.........................................
He had to pass a background check to get a FL teaching license.
And if he's anywhere near the rarified air he brags about, I'm sure the D0D has done some background research for his USAF job.
You need a background check to teach kids. You don't need one to slaughter them.
When straw purchases and other gun show loopholes are closed, he's really gonna go DEFCON 5 on us.
bluemoon wrote:William wrote:bluemoon wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:bluemoon wrote:I'm tired of the debate and ready for the vote. I can't imagine why anyone would oppose background checks for gun owners. A four year old just shot a 6 year old a day or so ago. I'm tired of gun owners who are not responsible. Most are, I know that, but some are not. If the kid who shot the babies in Newtown had a responsible mother, there would have been no shootings.
How does a background check presume responsibility? Tell me. This ought to be interesting. The only thing a background check can do is see if you have a criminal record. That is why criminals do not buy guns where background checks are performed.
I know you won't agree, but a background check should also ask if a gun buyer has ever been treated for mental illness. This isn't the wild west anymore.
If you think you need your gun to protect yourself against your democratically elected government, you've got some screws loose somewhere. Guns should be for hunting and home protection. No one wants to take yours away if you are a stable, responsible person.
Paranoid lunatics and criminals don't need guns.
.........................................
He had to pass a background check to get a FL teaching license.
And if he's anywhere near the rarified air he brags about, I'm sure the D0D has done some background research for his USAF job.
You need a background check to teach kids. You don't need one to slaughter them.
When straw purchases and other gun show loopholes are closed, he's really gonna go DEFCON 5 on us.
"You need a background check to teach kids. You don't need one to slaughter tham."
That's the best two sentences I've seen about gun ownership.
bluemoon wrote:PACEDOG#1 wrote:bluemoon wrote:I'm tired of the debate and ready for the vote. I can't imagine why anyone would oppose background checks for gun owners. A four year old just shot a 6 year old a day or so ago. I'm tired of gun owners who are not responsible. Most are, I know that, but some are not. If the kid who shot the babies in Newtown had a responsible mother, there would have been no shootings.
How does a background check presume responsibility? Tell me. This ought to be interesting. The only thing a background check can do is see if you have a criminal record. That is why criminals do not buy guns where background checks are performed.
I know you won't agree, but a background check should also ask if a gun buyer has ever been treated for mental illness. This isn't the wild west anymore. It's too bad that kind of question might go against the privacy act.
If you think you need your gun to protect yourself against your democratically elected government, you've got some screws loose somewhere. Guns should be for hunting and home protection. No one wants to take yours away if you are a stable, responsible person. There's no law like that even being talked about.
It's just that paranoid lunatics and criminals don't need guns. I don't know why anyone would disagree with that.
bluemoon wrote:Federal law already prohibits sales of guns to the mentally ill.
http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/10/opinion/donohue-background-checks/index.html
I guess it's not as complicated as you think it could be. I haven't seen any lists of people turned down for buying a gun because they are mentally ill. The government must already be handling it okay.
Markle wrote:I'm tired of it because there is nothing proposed which would have prevented any of the attacks the attacks are being USED to take away our 2nd Amendment rights.
Worse, it is taking valuable time from the two important issues of our time. The budget, cutting spending, the debt and immigration.
Wordslinger wrote:Markle wrote:I'm tired of it because there is nothing proposed which would have prevented any of the attacks the attacks are being USED to take away our 2nd Amendment rights.
Worse, it is taking valuable time from the two important issues of our time. The budget, cutting spending, the debt and immigration.
Once again folks, the things that rule Herr Markle are: 1. money 2. racism.
Why doesn't that surprise you? Reality.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum