One of the biggest scams of all time occured here locally; aided by an unscrupulous environmental reporter at the PNJ. I am talking about the old CONOCO lawsuit, which was fostered by the Levin/Papantonio law firm back in the mid 90s.
That and the "Mount Dioxin" scam at the old Escambia Woodtreating site. Were it not for the unscrupulous lawyer and reporter, and mouthy local activists who repeatedly appeared in the paper, those sites would never have been over-sensationalized like they were.
As it was, the law firm got a cool $25 million from CONOCO, and the rich folks who have lined the shoreline of Bayou Texar with big houses got small payouts, and their consciences were assuaged that building all of those houses all over the shoreline of Bayou Texar has not done anything to affect the environmental quality of the bayou (wrong assumptions). It was all CONOCO's fault (sic).
Then with the Mount Dioxin scam, the government financed the move of 350 families, mostly lower class folks. Purely political, and aided and abetted by biased and sensationalized newspaper reporting. I have reviewed the reports and data for both that site and Agrico, and they were way blown out of proportion for the actual health dangers presented.
Not long ago, my wife and I went over to Sanders beach to see the water front and the new community center built there. It is a quiet community, with new houses being built where Hurricane Ivan destroyed others. Two blocks away sits the American Creosote Works Super Fund Site, which also underwent investigation and remediation in the 1990s. I saw that data and reviewed many of that site's reports as well, and it was far more contaminated than either of the other two sites. There actually was dioxin in surface soil out in the nearby neighborhoods, and a large plume of contaminants flowing into Pensacola Bay. No families were moved, and the PNJ paid little attention to that site.
If you go to the new community center, out front to its left and right are rows of groundwater monitoring wells (they are painted yellow) used to sample the plume of contaminants flowing into the bay--the community center was built smack over the plume. I saw some men catching mullet off the dock--there are no signs preventing folks from fishing there. I have never been able to get my arms around why one area was so dangerous that it was labeled "Mount Dioxin" (I never saw dioxin in any of the data I reviewed); while the other site was of little concern.