Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Corporate Profits Have Risen 171% Under Marxist Administration

+3
othershoe1030
2seaoat
Sal
7 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Sal

Sal

Tom Donohue, the president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, last week said higher taxes and a “flood of new regulations” will damage an already subpar economy. “In many ways, we’re going backwards,” he said.

Such complaints, echoed by corporate executives throughout President Barack Obama’s first term, obscure one fact: American business has never had it so good.

U.S. corporations’ after-tax profits have grown by 171 percent under Obama, more than under any president since World War II, and are now at their highest level relative to the size of the economy since the government began keeping records in 1947, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Profits are more than twice as high as their peak during President Ronald Reagan’s administration and more than 50 percent greater than during the late-1990s Internet boom, measured by the size of the economy.

In a February 2012 survey, 80 percent of senior economics professors said unemployment was lower at the end of 2010 than it would have been without Obama’s stimulus spending. A July 2010 study by Alan Blinder, former Federal Reserve vice chairman, and Mark Zandi of Moody’s Analytics, said the stimulus, bank rescues and Fed policy “probably averted what could have been called Great Depression 2.0.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-17/corporate-profits-soar-as-executives-attack-obama-policy.html

Guest


Guest

It's like a bad movie with no James Bond to save us from these crooks..
They bought our supreme courts and government and are having their way with the general public..

http://gbgm-umc.org/Response/articles/corporate_welfare.html

2seaoat



We have a serious revenue issue when our deficits grow, and multinational companies come in and rape our country and take their booty home......King George at least allowed us time for tea.

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

The corporate media has so brainwashed the general public.

I imagine the heads on Fox News would literally explode if they were forced to report numbers such as these.

Many on the right believe their own fairy tale about the President being a socialist.

It is all socialism for the corporations and capitalism for the masses. Remember, you shouldn't punish success nor overtax the "job creators"! Isn't that how it goes for all the Joe the plumber types?

othershoe1030

othershoe1030





Corporate Profits Have Risen 171% Under Marxist Administration Income11

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:Tom Donohue, the president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, last week said higher taxes and a “flood of new regulations” will damage an already subpar economy. “In many ways, we’re going backwards,” he said.

Such complaints, echoed by corporate executives throughout President Barack Obama’s first term, obscure one fact: American business has never had it so good.

U.S. corporations’ after-tax profits have grown by 171 percent under Obama, more than under any president since World War II, and are now at their highest level relative to the size of the economy since the government began keeping records in 1947, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Profits are more than twice as high as their peak during President Ronald Reagan’s administration and more than 50 percent greater than during the late-1990s Internet boom, measured by the size of the economy.

In a February 2012 survey, 80 percent of senior economics professors said unemployment was lower at the end of 2010 than it would have been without Obama’s stimulus spending. A July 2010 study by Alan Blinder, former Federal Reserve vice chairman, and Mark Zandi of Moody’s Analytics, said the stimulus, bank rescues and Fed policy “probably averted what could have been called Great Depression 2.0.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-17/corporate-profits-soar-as-executives-attack-obama-policy.html

I'm not really that much of a fan of Obama, but I've always said the reason fox news and repugs hate him and report false information is simple: he's not all white. Anyone can say what they want but there are many people who just cannot take the fact that he is not lily white.

Guest


Guest

bigt wrote:
I'm not really that much of a fan of Obama, but I've always said the reason fox news and repugs hate him and report false information is simple: he's not all white. Anyone can say what they want but there are many people who just cannot take the fact that he is not lily white.

OMG you nailed it, people hate the POTUS solely because he is black. What are we going to do with all these racist running around criticizing our poor black president. Every one that dislikes or hates the POTUS is a racist piece of shit. That can be the only logical conclusion for everyone not bowing down and kissing his ass, it's because he is black.

Sorry but your race card is a tired worn out irrelevant cop out. A black man was elected which means a majority of WHITE voters voted for him so your racist insinuations are complete bullshit.

Sal

Sal

alecto wrote:A black man was elected which means a majority of WHITE voters voted for him so your racist insinuations are complete bullshit.

ROTFLMAO!!

You wanna rethink that one, dumbass?


Laughing

Guest


Guest

bigt wrote:

I'm not really that much of a fan of Obama, but I've always said the reason fox news and repugs hate him and report false information is simple: he's not all white. Anyone can say what they want but there are many people who just cannot take the fact that he is not lily white.



Along with your RACE card you forgot to play the "It's Bush's fault" card.

Guest


Guest



History[show]


















Philosophy[show]






















Variants[show]
















Movements[show]
















People[show]


























Socialism portal

Philosophy portal



v ·
t ·
e


Marxism is an economic and sociopolitical worldview and method of socioeconomic inquiry based upon a materialist interpretation of historical development, a dialectical view of social change, and an analysis of class-relations within society and their application in the analysis and critique of the development of capitalism. In the mid-to-late 19th century, the intellectual development of Marxism was pioneered by two German philosophers, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Marxist analyses and methodologies have influenced multiple political ideologies and social movements throughout history. Marxism encompasses an economic theory, a sociological theory, a philosophical method and a revolutionary view of social change.[1] There is no one definitive Marxist theory; Marxist analysis has been applied to a variety of different subjects and has been modified during the course of its development so that there are multiple Marxist theories.[2]

Marxism is based on a materialist understanding of societal development, taking at its starting point the necessary economic activities required by human society to provide for its material needs. The form of economic organization, or mode of production, is understood to be the basis from which the majority of other social phenomena — including social relations, political and legal systems, morality and ideology — arise (or at the least by which they are greatly influenced). These social relations form the superstructure, for which the economic system forms the base. As the forces of production (most notably technology) improve, existing forms of social organization become inefficient and stifle further progress. These inefficiencies manifest themselves as social contradictions in the form of class struggle.[3]

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

If corporate profits have risen 171% under a Marxist, how much would they have risen under a capitalist?

This Marxist charge reduces the credibility of the people who link that term with the president. Who the hell believes charges like this? Would those people qualify as being part of the right wing fringe? That's where I'd put them.

Guest


Guest

othershoe1030 wrote:If corporate profits have risen 171% under a Marxist, how much would they have risen under a capitalist?

This Marxist charge reduces the credibility of the people who link that term with the president. Who the hell believes charges like this? Would those people qualify as being part of the right wing fringe? That's where I'd put them.

Its my understanding that under a true capitalistic society free markets reign. and gov's dont bailout big biz or pump artificial bond buying into the market by way of the federal reserve. So my guess is a lot less. But we will never know. But one thing we can assure is, that the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting handouts and the middle class is going the way of the dinasour. We might as well make our currency the peso and declare our national fav food as the burrito.

Guest


Guest

Chrissy wrote:
othershoe1030 wrote:If corporate profits have risen 171% under a Marxist, how much would they have risen under a capitalist?

This Marxist charge reduces the credibility of the people who link that term with the president. Who the hell believes charges like this? Would those people qualify as being part of the right wing fringe? That's where I'd put them.

Its my understanding that under a true capitalistic society free markets reign. and gov's dont bailout big biz or pump artificial bond buying into the market by way of the federal reserve. So my guess is a lot less. But we will never know. But one thing we can assure is, that the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting handouts and the middle class is going the way of the dinasour. We might as well make our currency the peso and declare our national fav food as the burrito.

Shocked

Markle

Markle

othershoe1030 wrote:If corporate profits have risen 171% under a Marxist, how much would they have risen under a capitalist?

This Marxist charge reduces the credibility of the people who link that term with the president. Who the hell believes charges like this? Would those people qualify as being part of the right wing fringe? That's where I'd put them.

President Barack Hussein Obama wrote it himself about himself. Why do you not believe him?

Corporate Profits Have Risen 171% Under Marxist Administration ObamaMarxistProfessors-1-2

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:We have a serious revenue issue when our deficits grow, and multinational companies come in and rape our country and take their booty home......King George at least allowed us time for tea.

As you know, we do not have a revenue problem, we have a gross SPENDING problem. President Barack Hussein Obama has said he is sick of hearing about a SPENDING problem.

Margin Call

Margin Call

Markle wrote:
As you know, we do not have a revenue problem, we have a gross SPENDING problem. P

Yet, you carp incessantly about how we are still in a recession. What happens to tax revenues during a recession, Markle? A little consistency from you on one topic would be great to see one day.

Guest


Guest

Our San Francisco plumbers work in one of the largest and most spread out cities in the whole country. The city of San Francisco itself is designed in a very interesting way, as the region is exceptionally hilly. Most homes are townhouses or apartment buildings, crammed in quite close together. Thus, plumbers in San Francisco have to deal with plenty of piping problems due to overuse and overcrowding.[url=URL: http://plumbers-sanfrancisco-ca.com/]Francisco plumbers[/url]

Hospital Bob

Hospital Bob

I think I have the proof that at least 41% of all white males in the country don't have racist feelings about Obama.
Because that's the number of white males who voted for Obama in 08.
And trust me, when there's a choice between a black (even half black, doesn't matter) president, and a white president, a racist will never choose the black president.
And additional to that 41%, there would have also been many who voted for McCain only because they preferred his policies, that just stands to reason.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Margin Call wrote:
Markle wrote:
As you know, we do not have a revenue problem, we have a gross SPENDING problem. P

Yet, you carp incessantly about how we are still in a recession. What happens to tax revenues during a recession, Markle? A little consistency from you on one topic would be great to see one day.

Right-wingers want this administration to fail so badly that they would likely revell in another stock market crash, so long as it occurred before January of 2017.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Margin Call wrote:
Markle wrote:
As you know, we do not have a revenue problem, we have a gross SPENDING problem. P

Yet, you carp incessantly about how we are still in a recession. What happens to tax revenues during a recession, Markle? A little consistency from you on one topic would be great to see one day.

Right-wingers want this administration to fail so badly that they would likely revell in another stock market crash, so long as it occurred before January of 2017.

No doubt about it. They throw wrenches into the works and then say government doesn't work. It is not "country first" for them. What recovery we have had was in spite of them like a fish swimming upstream.

Markle

Markle

bigt wrote:
Sal wrote:Tom Donohue, the president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, last week said higher taxes and a “flood of new regulations” will damage an already subpar economy. “In many ways, we’re going backwards,” he said.

Such complaints, echoed by corporate executives throughout President Barack Obama’s first term, obscure one fact: American business has never had it so good.

U.S. corporations’ after-tax profits have grown by 171 percent under Obama, more than under any president since World War II, and are now at their highest level relative to the size of the economy since the government began keeping records in 1947, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Profits are more than twice as high as their peak during President Ronald Reagan’s administration and more than 50 percent greater than during the late-1990s Internet boom, measured by the size of the economy.

In a February 2012 survey, 80 percent of senior economics professors said unemployment was lower at the end of 2010 than it would have been without Obama’s stimulus spending. A July 2010 study by Alan Blinder, former Federal Reserve vice chairman, and Mark Zandi of Moody’s Analytics, said the stimulus, bank rescues and Fed policy “probably averted what could have been called Great Depression 2.0.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-17/corporate-profits-soar-as-executives-attack-obama-policy.html

I'm not really that much of a fan of Obama, but I've always said the reason fox news and repugs hate him and report false information is simple: he's not all white. Anyone can say what they want but there are many people who just cannot take the fact that he is not lily white.

And how many blacks voted for him because he is black?

Corporate Profits Have Risen 171% Under Marxist Administration ShoutRacist

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

Markle wrote:
bigt wrote:
Sal wrote:Tom Donohue, the president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, last week said higher taxes and a “flood of new regulations” will damage an already subpar economy. “In many ways, we’re going backwards,” he said.

Such complaints, echoed by corporate executives throughout President Barack Obama’s first term, obscure one fact: American business has never had it so good.

U.S. corporations’ after-tax profits have grown by 171 percent under Obama, more than under any president since World War II, and are now at their highest level relative to the size of the economy since the government began keeping records in 1947, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Profits are more than twice as high as their peak during President Ronald Reagan’s administration and more than 50 percent greater than during the late-1990s Internet boom, measured by the size of the economy.

In a February 2012 survey, 80 percent of senior economics professors said unemployment was lower at the end of 2010 than it would have been without Obama’s stimulus spending. A July 2010 study by Alan Blinder, former Federal Reserve vice chairman, and Mark Zandi of Moody’s Analytics, said the stimulus, bank rescues and Fed policy “probably averted what could have been called Great Depression 2.0.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-17/corporate-profits-soar-as-executives-attack-obama-policy.html

I'm not really that much of a fan of Obama, but I've always said the reason fox news and repugs hate him and report false information is simple: he's not all white. Anyone can say what they want but there are many people who just cannot take the fact that he is not lily white.

And how many blacks voted for him because he is black?

Corporate Profits Have Risen 171% Under Marxist Administration ShoutRacist

Why is it shocking to know blacks voted for Obama in overwhelming numbers when no one blinks at whites voting for whites?I guess you have nothing to say about skyrocketing corporate profits? Why are those profits up so much?

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum