Mr. Oat wants you fined and or imprisoned..

As with all registrations they require maintenance. The type Seatoat wants are technological in nature and subject to the further requirement of reliable operation. I can see the scenario now, The Firearms compliance truck cruises by your house and pings it. Then they knock on your door with law enforcement powers and proclaim that their electronic survey showed an AR15 missing from the house. Seeing has no use or transfer form had been filled out you were not in compliance. May we see the weapon they ask? You bring it to them as they await with guns drawn, You carry the weapon as instructed countless times at the store where you purchased it and by public service commercials. You have the action open and are holding it in one hand with the barrel down along with your head facing the floor walking very slowly counting off a second between steps. They take the gun from your hand and instruct you to turn and face the wall while they examine it. The RFID has expired and so your signal is weak and not accessible.They inform you that your RFID has failed and confiscate your weapon, cuff and arrest you on a serious violation of the seaoat gun law. So off to jail you go no judge no jury. You bail out and spend months of compliance training not to mention hundreds of dollars to pay fines and training fees.......the states only tool is force and their greatest want is revenue,,,,the new law works very well... next violation carries time in a federal industrial production prison making RFID chips.....


Oh and of course Lucky your dog was shot dead in your front yard.....compliance officers are taught to shoot any lose dogs friendly or not..

The very reason that the vehicle has the control module in it and the weapons themselves are not tied into a control module in the house is that our constitution is very specific in the protections in our homes from government intrusion. I cannot imagine congress passing a bill which allows for intrusions into the home.

The key with registration, biometric trigger locks and chips is that when guns are being transported by vehicle there must be a match. I do not think the American people want 1984 Orwellian intrusions in their homes, but we register autos, put identification plates on the autos, and we require that a driver be tested with a road test and a written test and meet certain requirements before we issue a driver's license. A valid foid card could easily be incorporated into the database for each states driver's license renewal process, and a person could effortlessly renew at the time of their DL which would be a chipped smart card. Now, every American who chose to own guns would have an DL with an inventory of his or her weapons on their card. If the guns are at home, and a chip fails(they will and even at 99.9% non failure there still will be failure) nothing is going to happen to the citizen. However, if the person tries to start his car with the failed chipped gun it will not operate. The person will have to take the weapon out, and go to his local dealer and get a temporary carry chip from the dealer....update his foid at the dealer.....drive home and pick up the weapon.....temporarily attach the temporary carry chip, and take the weapon to the dealer to have a permanent chip installed per specifications of that gun. This is not rocket science. Nobody is taking a weapon away. There will be no need for a total ban on Automatic weapons, but stricter controls, and in my opinion a reduction in the licenses for the same with some sort of lottery being available for people who pass rigid tests and do allow home inspections for annual inspections of their gun safe, the biometric trigger on the weapon, the chips, and a interview with the owner to determine their mental health and general disposition, but most importantly to double check his liability insurance on the assault weapon. So yes, I could imagine home visits once a year for an inspection on an assault weapon, rather than a total ban.

Inspection of their gunsafe ?...where is that kept....IN THEIR HOME.

Inspection of their gunsafe ?...where is that kept....IN THEIR HOME.

I would envision probably 5k assault weapon licenses in the lottery, and yes there would have to be home inspections annually to make sure everything was in order. The remainder of gun owners would have no reason to have an inspection. My truck has to be physically inspected every few years for safety. My car does not. The danger to the public of an unsafe truck is a far greater risk than a VW bug so we focus on making sure trucks are safe. Now we could have annual inspections of cars, but we do not see the utility of the same. A mass murder could easily happen with a shot gun, or baseball bat, but the utility of going into homes to inspect shot guns and baseball bats gives us a very low return on our investment.

If our choice is an outright ban or annual inspections.....I think the inspection route with a limited number of licenses is the proper route.

2seaoat wrote:[b]. A mass murder could easily happen with a shot gun, or baseball bat, but the utility of going into homes to inspect shot guns and baseball bats gives us a very low return on our investment.

If our choice is an outright ban or annual inspections.....I think the inspection route with a limited number of licenses is the proper route.

Okay that cuts it...THE BIGGEST MASS MURDERERS IN ALL OF HISTORY HAVE BEEN GOVERNMENTS HOW BOUT YOU THINK OF SOME FRICKEN CONTROLS ON THEM !


NO it is not right or okay or legal for fuckin government to kill it's citizens !!!!!