I do not get something I just saw on MSN website:
http://now.msn.com/nail-houses-around-the-world-photo-gallery
They show private property where owners refused to sell and development was built around the owners. I expected to see that in a capitalist society where private property is protected in constitutions, but in a communist society, there should be no private property. So if China is a communist country......why would they allow one privately owned house to block a road, or development......I am befuddled by what they presented.
In America.....the local commisar and his governmental board will decide they want to "take" your property.....and offer usually pennies on the dollar. It just seems odd to see so many examples of private land holders holding on when the general view of communism is that there is no private property, or rights in private property.
http://now.msn.com/nail-houses-around-the-world-photo-gallery
They show private property where owners refused to sell and development was built around the owners. I expected to see that in a capitalist society where private property is protected in constitutions, but in a communist society, there should be no private property. So if China is a communist country......why would they allow one privately owned house to block a road, or development......I am befuddled by what they presented.
In America.....the local commisar and his governmental board will decide they want to "take" your property.....and offer usually pennies on the dollar. It just seems odd to see so many examples of private land holders holding on when the general view of communism is that there is no private property, or rights in private property.