Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

19605-0 Really?

5 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

119605-0 Really? Empty 19605-0 Really? 11/16/2012, 6:51 pm

Guest


Guest

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/obamas_jonestowns.html



Hmmm...I call BS on this tally of votes.

219605-0 Really? Empty Re: 19605-0 Really? 11/16/2012, 6:57 pm

Sal

Sal

PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/obamas_jonestowns.html



Hmmm...I call BS on this tally of votes.

LMAO!

319605-0 Really? Empty Re: 19605-0 Really? 11/16/2012, 8:37 pm

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Ghandi_is_my_bitch wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/obamas_jonestowns.html



Hmmm...I call BS on this tally of votes.

LMAO!

I don't know whether to laugh my ass off at the sources where PaceDog gets his "news," or just feel sorry for his pitiable soul...... American Thinker, The Blaze... All these rags do is manipulate the weak-minded into believing incontrovertible BS as the plain truth.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

419605-0 Really? Empty Re: 19605-0 Really? 11/16/2012, 9:37 pm

Guest


Guest

Damn, Thank goodness for such great reporting. I never knew. Obama/Jones town sure................

According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, which has no interest in deceiving, the answer is yes. Immediately, one suspects some element of fraud, but fraud isn't the real issue here. Obama was producing nearly comparable numbers in inner-cities throughout America, especially those in contested states.
Worse than fraud is the process that turned nearly 20,000 black Philadelphians -- and millions of inner-city dwellers throughout the country -- into automatons. Hope does not produce this kind of regimentation. Fear does. In looking at these numbers, in fact, one can begin to see how, 34 years ago this Sunday, in the jungles of Guyana, Jim Jones was able to persuade 918 of his followers, most of them poor and black, to drink their lethal Kool-Aid. Fear can do that.


Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/obamas_jonestowns.html#ixzz2CRJjMFf6

519605-0 Really? Empty Re: 19605-0 Really? 11/16/2012, 10:48 pm

Markle

Markle

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Ghandi_is_my_bitch wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/obamas_jonestowns.html



Hmmm...I call BS on this tally of votes.

LMAO!

I don't know whether to laugh my ass off at the sources where PaceDog gets his "news," or just feel sorry for his pitiable soul...... American Thinker, The Blaze... All these rags do is manipulate the weak-minded into believing incontrovertible BS as the plain truth.

Regardless of the source, the FACTS are THE FACTS.

Unlike what comes from your favorite sources such as the DailyKOS.

Markle

Markle

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Ghandi_is_my_bitch wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/obamas_jonestowns.html

Hmmm...I call BS on this tally of votes.

LMAO!

I don't know whether to laugh my ass off at the sources where PaceDog gets his "news," or just feel sorry for his pitiable soul...... American Thinker, The Blaze... All these rags do is manipulate the weak-minded into believing incontrovertible BS as the plain truth.

Source?

Philly.com

One would think they might know too.

In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes

November 13, 2012|By Miriam Hill, Andrew Seidman, and John Duchneskie, Inquirer Staff Writers

It's one thing for a Democratic presidential candidate to dominate a Democratic city like Philadelphia, but check out this head-spinning figure: In 59 voting divisions in the city, Mitt Romney received not one vote. Zero. Zilch.

Read more Progressives....
http://articles.philly.com/2012-11-13/news/35069785_1_romney-supporters-mitt-romney-voter-id-law

They're just told to vote for the name with the (D) alongside.

719605-0 Really? Empty Re: 19605-0 Really? 11/16/2012, 11:26 pm

Guest


Guest

Blue represents the Blacks in Philly. I would wager there are areas where no white people live. Why should they vote for a white guy? Deny Racism and you see the results. Why is this even news?

, Red is White, Blue is Black, Green is Asian, Orange is Hispanic, Gray is Other, and each dot is 25 people

19605-0 Really? 600px-Race_and_ethnicity_Philadelphia

819605-0 Really? Empty Re: 19605-0 Really? 11/17/2012, 12:13 am

KarlRove

KarlRove

hallmarkgrad wrote:Blue represents the Blacks in Philly. I would wager there are areas where no white people live. Why should they vote for a white guy? Deny Racism and you see the results. Why is this even news?

, Red is White, Blue is Black, Green is Asian, Orange is Hispanic, Gray is Other, and each dot is 25 people

19605-0 Really? 600px-Race_and_ethnicity_Philadelphia



So an African American cannot vote for a caucasian? Racist.

919605-0 Really? Empty Re: 19605-0 Really? 11/17/2012, 7:41 am

Guest


Guest

So an African American cannot vote for a caucasian? Racist.

Of course they can, But odds are they will not. The actions of others make me a raciest?

1019605-0 Really? Empty Re: 19605-0 Really? 11/17/2012, 9:22 pm

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

Markle wrote:
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Ghandi_is_my_bitch wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/obamas_jonestowns.html

Hmmm...I call BS on this tally of votes.

LMAO!

I don't know whether to laugh my ass off at the sources where PaceDog gets his "news," or just feel sorry for his pitiable soul...... American Thinker, The Blaze... All these rags do is manipulate the weak-minded into believing incontrovertible BS as the plain truth.

Source?

Philly.com

One would think they might know too.

In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes

November 13, 2012|By Miriam Hill, Andrew Seidman, and John Duchneskie, Inquirer Staff Writers

It's one thing for a Democratic presidential candidate to dominate a Democratic city like Philadelphia, but check out this head-spinning figure: In 59 voting divisions in the city, Mitt Romney received not one vote. Zero. Zilch.

Read more Progressives....
http://articles.philly.com/2012-11-13/news/35069785_1_romney-supporters-mitt-romney-voter-id-law

They're just told to vote for the name with the (D) alongside.

Told by whom? I can imagine people not wanting to vote for a man who obviously didn't care one iota about them. Romney was that man.

1119605-0 Really? Empty Re: 19605-0 Really? 11/17/2012, 9:25 pm

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

hallmarkgrad wrote:So an African American cannot vote for a caucasian? Racist.

Of course they can, But odds are they will not. The actions of others make me a raciest?

That's the beauty of the USA...anyone can vote for anyone. In this case...the best man won. Get over it. And I disagree that because someone is black, they'll automatically vote for the black candidate. It's not about race at all, as much as some people would like it to be.

1219605-0 Really? Empty Re: 19605-0 Really? 11/17/2012, 9:45 pm

Markle

Markle

Floridatexan wrote:
Markle wrote:
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Ghandi_is_my_bitch wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/obamas_jonestowns.html

Hmmm...I call BS on this tally of votes.

LMAO!

I don't know whether to laugh my ass off at the sources where PaceDog gets his "news," or just feel sorry for his pitiable soul...... American Thinker, The Blaze... All these rags do is manipulate the weak-minded into believing incontrovertible BS as the plain truth.

Source?

Philly.com

One would think they might know too.

In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes

November 13, 2012|By Miriam Hill, Andrew Seidman, and John Duchneskie, Inquirer Staff Writers

It's one thing for a Democratic presidential candidate to dominate a Democratic city like Philadelphia, but check out this head-spinning figure: In 59 voting divisions in the city, Mitt Romney received not one vote. Zero. Zilch.

Read more Progressives....
http://articles.philly.com/2012-11-13/news/35069785_1_romney-supporters-mitt-romney-voter-id-law

They're just told to vote for the name with the (D) alongside.

Told by whom? I can imagine people not wanting to vote for a man who obviously didn't care one iota about them. Romney was that man.

So let me get this straight.

The person who has more blacks on welfare, unemployed, on food stamps, section 8 housing, and living below the poverty line, reduced the mean income, increased the cost of health care and has no plan for the future, President Barack Hussein Obama, cares about them. Now THAT'S RACISM!

Share with us, how is it good for America to have millions and millions more people depending on GOVERNMENT for their survival? You must have a good reason, you know like those in Greece, Spain, Portugal, Italy and even California. What is it?

1319605-0 Really? Empty Re: 19605-0 Really? 11/17/2012, 9:54 pm

Markle

Markle

Floridatexan wrote:
Markle wrote:
ZVUGKTUBM wrote:
Ghandi_is_my_bitch wrote:
PACEDOG#1 wrote:http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/11/obamas_jonestowns.html

Hmmm...I call BS on this tally of votes.

LMAO!

I don't know whether to laugh my ass off at the sources where PaceDog gets his "news," or just feel sorry for his pitiable soul...... American Thinker, The Blaze... All these rags do is manipulate the weak-minded into believing incontrovertible BS as the plain truth.

Source?

Philly.com

One would think they might know too.

In 59 Philadelphia voting divisions, Mitt Romney got zero votes

November 13, 2012|By Miriam Hill, Andrew Seidman, and John Duchneskie, Inquirer Staff Writers

It's one thing for a Democratic presidential candidate to dominate a Democratic city like Philadelphia, but check out this head-spinning figure: In 59 voting divisions in the city, Mitt Romney received not one vote. Zero. Zilch.

Read more Progressives....
http://articles.philly.com/2012-11-13/news/35069785_1_romney-supporters-mitt-romney-voter-id-law

They're just told to vote for the name with the (D) alongside.

Told by whom? I can imagine people not wanting to vote for a man who obviously didn't care one iota about them. Romney was that man.

You're joking.

Even Eric Holder put a stop to a small North Carolina town who had voted overwhelmingly to have non-partisian races for their city council and mayor. Holder stated that not having a (D), (R) or (I) next to the name deprived the voters of free choice.

1419605-0 Really? Empty Re: 19605-0 Really? 11/17/2012, 10:01 pm

Guest


Guest

Floridatexan wrote:
hallmarkgrad wrote:So an African American cannot vote for a caucasian? Racist.

Of course they can, But odds are they will not. The actions of others make me a raciest?

That's the beauty of the USA...anyone can vote for anyone. In this case...the best man won. Get over it. And I disagree that because someone is black, they'll automatically vote for the black candidate. It's not about race at all, as much as some people would like it to be.

That's correct,FT. My office colleague who is black voted for Romney. I asked him why he voted for Romney and he didn't particularly like Romney but said he voted for the cause as a whole. I thought that was interesting as he worked w/ the poor as much as I do.

1519605-0 Really? Empty Re: 19605-0 Really? 11/17/2012, 10:21 pm

Guest


Guest

Bill OReilly had a segment on it too saying Romney got zero votes.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum