Pensacola Discussion Forum
Rogue wrote:http://www.haarpstatus.com/status.html
Readings continue in the Northeast with a start longwave time on October 19th, peaking a few days ago. The white shade has not been seen before in this project and we suspect it is a reading that is over 10. Unknown at the time.
Western USA signals are sustained at around a 5.6 and have been for a couple days now, after having grown from a 3.0 yesterday morning.
Cause: Unknown
Follow Hurricane Sandy on our partner's page at TheWeatherSpace.com's Facebook Page by Clicking Here
i know some of you ay not be familiar with haarp or haarpstatus.com. but you may be familiar with weatherspace.com... these are very respectable sites.
[img][/img]
this storm was man made, and they knew exactly where it was going to go
read the site, interesting.
have a good night....
Bob wrote:The hurricane is going to keep people from voting in the blue states which will hurt obama. Wouldn't that mean that Romney and his people must be the ones who created this hurricane?
Bob wrote:You forgot to put a reply in your post, Slice. Do you think Obama made the hurricane or Romney?
Well if that no good son of a bitch Putin created this hurricane I hope he dies a slow painful death. Because a bunch of my life savings is tied up in Con Ed stock and when the market opens I'm guessing that shit is gonna tank bigtime.Bob wrote:
there are others in the world who have this, russia is known to have it. There are others too.
Rogue wrote:http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion/2012/10/us-presidential-elections-is-haarp-steering-sandy-2440172.html
Bob wrote:Rogue wrote:http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion/2012/10/us-presidential-elections-is-haarp-steering-sandy-2440172.html
Well now I'm confused again, Chrissy. Who made the hurricane and steered it onto Rhode Island to tamper with the election? It musta been either obama or romney. Do you think since obama is a commie muslim that it musta been him what done it?
Rogue wrote:
and yes, if i had to make a guess it would be russia
Bob wrote:You forgot to put a reply in your post, Slice. Do you think Obama made the hurricane or Romney?
My money would be on neither. I think it had to be obama's great great grandfather, Mahmoud Obama.Slicef18 wrote:
To ask if Obama or Romney or caused the hurricane is like asking if the destruction of Pompeii was caused by the pimps, prostitutes or Johns.
Bob wrote:Rogue wrote:http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion/2012/10/us-presidential-elections-is-haarp-steering-sandy-2440172.html
Well now I'm confused again, Chrissy. Who made the hurricane and steered it onto Rhode Island to tamper with the election? It musta been either obama or romney. Do you think since obama is a commie muslim that it musta been him what done it?
Yella wrote:Bob wrote:Rogue wrote:http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion/2012/10/us-presidential-elections-is-haarp-steering-sandy-2440172.html
Well now I'm confused again, Chrissy. Who made the hurricane and steered it onto Rhode Island to tamper with the election? It musta been either obama or romney. Do you think since obama is a commie muslim that it musta been him what done it?
Dick Cheney, that clever old bastard of death and destruction made it happen in his spare time, when he wasn't out hunting quail after dark.
Bob wrote:What do you make of this, Chrissy? Do you think it's The New World Order trying to trick us into believing the website you showed is bogus?
http://metabunk.org/threads/385-Debunked-HaarpStatus-com
Rogue wrote: Ill pose these questions to you.
Why is it so difficult to beleive that we can make a storm stronger when we can create clouds in a chamber for a kids science project?
Why is it so difficult to beleive that we can seed storms when the gov has already told us they have this technology?
Why is it such a simply thing like feeding/seeding a storm is looked upon like a crazy person but yet we can land on mars, hit meteors with missles, have nuclear energy, measure the god particle and on and on.
You tell me, is it a fake or is it so true that someone doesnt want you to think about the simplest of ideas?
Bob wrote:Rogue wrote: Ill pose these questions to you.
Why is it so difficult to beleive that we can make a storm stronger when we can create clouds in a chamber for a kids science project?
Why is it so difficult to beleive that we can seed storms when the gov has already told us they have this technology?
Why is it such a simply thing like feeding/seeding a storm is looked upon like a crazy person but yet we can land on mars, hit meteors with missles, have nuclear energy, measure the god particle and on and on.
You tell me, is it a fake or is it so true that someone doesnt want you to think about the simplest of ideas?
Those are all good questions. And I can't deny that serious attempts have been made and most likely are still being made to do weather modification which does include attempts to modify tropical cyclones. The proof of that was Project Stormfury...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Stormfury
So here's my question to you. Assuming that the government or whatever it was does have this capability and did indeed influence control over Hurricane Sandy, the question is to accomplish what exactly? What was the motive? How did these sinister forces benefit from having a hurricane do such devastation? What does it get them?
Human beings, no matter how sinister they are, do things for a reason. They don't "just do them" like is often the case with conspiracy theories.
There needs to be a motive. And I cannot for the life of me understand what the motive would be to destroy the New Jersey shoreline and to cripple New York City on purpose.
So if you believe this to be the case then you're going to need to help me understand what that motive is and what it accomplished for these conspirators. That blogger who is making this claim didn't even attempt to provide a motive. Can you?
Be careful. To have "absolutely no doubt" (about anything) can lead your mind to places you don't always want to end up at. Always have some doubt. A little doubt is not a bad thing.Rogue wrote: I have absolutly no doubt in my mind about it.
Bob wrote:Be careful. To have "absolutely no doubt" (about anything) can lead your mind to places you don't always want to end up at. Always have some doubt. A little doubt is not a bad thing.Rogue wrote: I have absolutly no doubt in my mind about it.
Bob wrote:Be careful. To have "absolutely no doubt" (about anything) can lead your mind to places you don't always want to end up at. Always have some doubt. A little doubt is not a bad thing.Rogue wrote: I have absolutly no doubt in my mind about it.
Yella wrote:Bob wrote:Be careful. To have "absolutely no doubt" (about anything) can lead your mind to places you don't always want to end up at. Always have some doubt. A little doubt is not a bad thing.Rogue wrote: I have absolutly no doubt in my mind about it.
Bob, chrissy believes everything she reads if it negative towards any sort of liberal opinion. Hannity and Rush are both godlike entities to her. Bless her heart she is locked in step and will not falter. it is her view and her right.
Of course, she is clearly living in another world. LOL
Go to page : 1, 2
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|