Proving once again the republican way of giving to charity, Romney pledges salary to charity

knothead wrote:seaoat, Romney is clearly a sociopath. By any measure he can just flat out lie depending on his audience . . . . . I'm watching a discussion on Romney and the Blount Amendment as I write this. He says only days ago that of course women should not be subjected to an employer's feelings regarding insurance coverage for contraception availability: only days later when asked in a radio interview he was again asked and/or confronted with this position. NOW he says (laughingly) that "of course I support the Blount Amendment", WTF! This is only one example of the sociopaths characteristics he rountinely displays.

Since lying seems to be your qualifying standard for one to be a sociopath you must accept the fact Obama is also a sociopath. If you choose to grade based off of lies told and assign a numerical scale to illustrate your data then Obama is clearly a more of a sociopath than Romney.

When I saw what the man did with his qualified plan it confirmed my feelings about his condition. He cannot help himself. When he completely reverses himself on the Blount amendment, the written platform which he is running, and what he said last week.....it is not clumsy....it really is not Romnesia......it is pathological. If he was not given the trust which allowed him the educational opportunities to hone his skills as a vulture capitalist......he would have been your typical used car salesman, drug dealer, or common crook......but a million here and a million there......you have a successful sociopath.....held in high esteem.....well it took awhile to topple the statue of Saddam......and after an election this fall, his huge ego will hit the ground and shatter.....and Ann Romney is right to be concerned about his mental health.....I respect the lady.....she knows how serious and fragile his mental health has become.......mark my word.....America is not stupid......and people on this forum may give me a hard time....but they see what I see.....they just hate Obama more.

alecto wrote:

knothead wrote:seaoat, Romney is clearly a sociopath. By any measure he can just flat out lie depending on his audience . . . . . I'm watching a discussion on Romney and the Blount Amendment as I write this. He says only days ago that of course women should not be subjected to an employer's feelings regarding insurance coverage for contraception availability: only days later when asked in a radio interview he was again asked and/or confronted with this position. NOW he says (laughingly) that "of course I support the Blount Amendment", WTF! This is only one example of the sociopaths characteristics he rountinely displays.

Since lying seems to be your qualifying standard for one to be a sociopath you must accept the fact Obama is also a sociopath. If you choose to grade based off of lies told and assign a numerical scale to illustrate your data then Obama is clearly a more of a sociopath than Romney.

************************************************

I disagree. Obama is many things but his vision to a better future has been consistent, Romney has benn literally on every side of every issue. Even his own party does not know who the heck he is or what he will say next, almost as bad as Biden. Romney is like a dark hole in space, we just do not know him alecto and most do not trust him.

[quote="2seaoat"]When I saw what the man did with his qualified plan it confirmed my feelings about his condition. He cannot help himself. When he completely reverses himself on the Blount amendment, the written platform which he is running, and what he said last week.....it is not clumsy....it really is not Romnesia......it is pathological.


I'd really appreciate you're defining the above, SO., just so we know what you are saying and it's basis.

Rick Scott so generously gave up his salary too.....except he simply pays his staff higher salaries.

Margin Call wrote:Rick Scott so generously gave up his salary too.....except he simply pays his staff higher salaries.

Point?

I'd really appreciate you're defining the above, SO., just so we know what you are saying and it's basis.


This has become tedious.....but again for the 10th time

It is impossible to have 100 million in a qualified retirement plan. There is no honest man in America who has over three or four million in their plan because the contribution levels and rate of return cannot allow the same. If a person puts undervalued assets in a IRA in the United States they can be criminally prosecuted. So Romney, goes overseas with his qualified plan and puts undervalued partnership shares in his qualified plan which is illegal in America, but cannot be prosecuted in another country and he steals from the American public as his tax avoidance scheme leaves him with 100 million which is growing tax free as we speak.......This man is a crook.

The Blount amendment is where employers will have the right to take certain coverage out of an employees insurance plan.....even though that coverage is standard in a policy. Romney clearly said he supports the amendment.....but did you watch the debate this past week......he stood up and clearly said he never supported employers having any say in an employee getting contraceptives.....a blatant lie......and then to make worse his shills go on TV and try to say that he really did not lie because the Blount amendment only goes to religious institutions...........nope just one more lie for those soft between the ears......the Blount amendment is applicable to all employers....not restricted to religious institutions.

The written platform on which Mr. Romney is running calls for a 20% reductions in tax rates for all Americans.....ALL.....yet he says at the first debate that he never said he was going to cut the rate on the top rates.

The man is a pathological liar....just what Newt called him, but Newt was buried by 9-1 spending and sadly people think they have to support this man because he now represents the Republican party.....he does not.....he is the candidate of the Oligarchy who want to steal America....just see what is happening in Freeport Illinois.....the choice has never been more clear.....and I did not vote for Obama.....I just would never vote for a traitor.

Seaoat has pension envy.

Here are 84 reasons why NEWT could never be POTUS-

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1716209/pg1

Gingrich acknowledged in January 1997 that "In my name and over my signature, inaccurate, incomplete and unreliable statements were given to the committee". The House Ethics Committee concluded that inaccurate information supplied to investigators represented "intentional or ... reckless" disregard of House rules. Special Counsel James M. Cole concluded that Gingrich violated federal tax law and had lied to the ethics panel in an effort to force the committee to dismiss the complaint against him. The full committee panel did not agree whether tax law had been violated and left that issue up to the IRS

I do not envy anybody......but you think newt is a crook over pennies while Romney has stolen hundreds of millions, and is shipping our technology, our machines, and our jobs to China.....Newt was never an economic traitor....he was the only one who could cut the fat out of this government and that was his goal.......not stealing more of this country's wealth and transferring the same to the Oligarchy.

alecto wrote:I see it a little diffrent

1) Do they have problems sustaining stable relationships, personally and in business?

Romney = not at all
Obama = not at all

2) Do they frequently manipulate others to achieve selfish goals, with no consideration of the effects on those manipulated?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

3) Are they cavalier about the truth, and capable of telling lies to your face?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

4) Do they have an air of self-importance, regardless of their true standing in society?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

5) Have they no apparent sense of remorse, shame or guilt?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

6) Is their charm superficial, and capable of being switched on to suit immediate ends?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

7) Are they easily bored and demand constant stimulation?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

Are their displays of human emotion unconvincing?

Romney = partially
Obama = partially

9) Do they enjoy taking risks, and acting on reckless impulse?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

10) Are they quick to blame others for their mistakes?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

11) As teenagers, did they resent authority, play truant and/or steal?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

12) Do they have no qualms about sponging off others?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

13) Are they quick to lose their temper?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

14) Are they sexually promiscuous?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

15) Do they have a belligerent, bullying manner?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

16) Are they unrealistic about their long-term aims?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

17) Do they lack any ability to empathise with others?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

18) Would you regard them as essentially irresponsible?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

Total Score

Romney = 11
Obama = 27

EXCELLENT!!!!! Thank you for taking the time to answer and post this. It clearly shows the truth.

Rogue wrote:

alecto wrote:I see it a little diffrent

1) Do they have problems sustaining stable relationships, personally and in business?

Romney = not at all
Obama = not at all

2) Do they frequently manipulate others to achieve selfish goals, with no consideration of the effects on those manipulated?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

3) Are they cavalier about the truth, and capable of telling lies to your face?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

4) Do they have an air of self-importance, regardless of their true standing in society?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

5) Have they no apparent sense of remorse, shame or guilt?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

6) Is their charm superficial, and capable of being switched on to suit immediate ends?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

7) Are they easily bored and demand constant stimulation?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

Are their displays of human emotion unconvincing?

Romney = partially
Obama = partially

9) Do they enjoy taking risks, and acting on reckless impulse?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

10) Are they quick to blame others for their mistakes?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

11) As teenagers, did they resent authority, play truant and/or steal?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

12) Do they have no qualms about sponging off others?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

13) Are they quick to lose their temper?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

14) Are they sexually promiscuous?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

15) Do they have a belligerent, bullying manner?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

16) Are they unrealistic about their long-term aims?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

17) Do they lack any ability to empathise with others?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

18) Would you regard them as essentially irresponsible?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

Total Score

Romney = 11
Obama = 27

EXCELLENT!!!!! Thank you for taking the time to answer and post this. It clearly shows the truth.

******************************************************8

Very scientific evaluation . . . . . . NOT!

Rogue wrote:

alecto wrote:I see it a little diffrent

1) Do they have problems sustaining stable relationships, personally and in business?

Romney = not at all
Obama = not at all

2) Do they frequently manipulate others to achieve selfish goals, with no consideration of the effects on those manipulated?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

3) Are they cavalier about the truth, and capable of telling lies to your face?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

4) Do they have an air of self-importance, regardless of their true standing in society?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

5) Have they no apparent sense of remorse, shame or guilt?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

6) Is their charm superficial, and capable of being switched on to suit immediate ends?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

7) Are they easily bored and demand constant stimulation?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

Are their displays of human emotion unconvincing?

Romney = partially
Obama = partially

9) Do they enjoy taking risks, and acting on reckless impulse?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

10) Are they quick to blame others for their mistakes?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

11) As teenagers, did they resent authority, play truant and/or steal?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

12) Do they have no qualms about sponging off others?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

13) Are they quick to lose their temper?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

14) Are they sexually promiscuous?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

15) Do they have a belligerent, bullying manner?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

16) Are they unrealistic about their long-term aims?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

17) Do they lack any ability to empathise with others?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

18) Would you regard them as essentially irresponsible?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

Total Score

Romney = 11
Obama = 27

EXCELLENT!!!!! Thank you for taking the time to answer and post this. It clearly shows the truth.

It clearly shows an opinion.Since when is that the truth?

knothead wrote:

Rogue wrote:

alecto wrote:I see it a little diffrent

1) Do they have problems sustaining stable relationships, personally and in business?

Romney = not at all
Obama = not at all

2) Do they frequently manipulate others to achieve selfish goals, with no consideration of the effects on those manipulated?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

3) Are they cavalier about the truth, and capable of telling lies to your face?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

4) Do they have an air of self-importance, regardless of their true standing in society?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

5) Have they no apparent sense of remorse, shame or guilt?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

6) Is their charm superficial, and capable of being switched on to suit immediate ends?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

7) Are they easily bored and demand constant stimulation?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

Are their displays of human emotion unconvincing?

Romney = partially
Obama = partially

9) Do they enjoy taking risks, and acting on reckless impulse?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

10) Are they quick to blame others for their mistakes?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

11) As teenagers, did they resent authority, play truant and/or steal?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

12) Do they have no qualms about sponging off others?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

13) Are they quick to lose their temper?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

14) Are they sexually promiscuous?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

15) Do they have a belligerent, bullying manner?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

16) Are they unrealistic about their long-term aims?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

17) Do they lack any ability to empathise with others?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

18) Would you regard them as essentially irresponsible?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

Total Score

Romney = 11
Obama = 27

EXCELLENT!!!!! Thank you for taking the time to answer and post this. It clearly shows the truth.

******************************************************8

Very scientific evaluation . . . . . . NOT!

I think it was just as scientific as seaoat using it. Do you not agree?

Dreamsglore wrote:
It clearly shows an opinion.Since when is that the truth?

You are correct, it shows an opinion, my opinion. Since seagoat put so much stock in this test to illustrate yet another seagoat flawed and biased summary of an individual who he is incapable of understanding I figured I would offer my opinion on the candidates. He has become obsessed and desperate and he displays it daily in his maniacal rants.

Since when did I say that Romney was a sociopath, and that has been confirmed by an expert. We will have to see what his criminal tax evasion trial will use as a defense. Ann has concerns over his mental health, and I share her concerns. I have an opinion, and I am not an expert on mental health. My opinion is that he is a classic sociopath. He does not follow rules and he is a compulsive liar. You can disagree with my opinion....you can deny the candidate's wife who has concerns, but in the end I am not desperate. I voted. My candidate will not win, but eventually good people we get good candidates into office. Romney simply will not win.

Rogue wrote:

knothead wrote:

Rogue wrote:

alecto wrote:I see it a little diffrent

1) Do they have problems sustaining stable relationships, personally and in business?

Romney = not at all
Obama = not at all

2) Do they frequently manipulate others to achieve selfish goals, with no consideration of the effects on those manipulated?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

3) Are they cavalier about the truth, and capable of telling lies to your face?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

4) Do they have an air of self-importance, regardless of their true standing in society?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

5) Have they no apparent sense of remorse, shame or guilt?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

6) Is their charm superficial, and capable of being switched on to suit immediate ends?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

7) Are they easily bored and demand constant stimulation?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

Are their displays of human emotion unconvincing?

Romney = partially
Obama = partially

9) Do they enjoy taking risks, and acting on reckless impulse?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

10) Are they quick to blame others for their mistakes?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

11) As teenagers, did they resent authority, play truant and/or steal?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

12) Do they have no qualms about sponging off others?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

13) Are they quick to lose their temper?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

14) Are they sexually promiscuous?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

15) Do they have a belligerent, bullying manner?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

16) Are they unrealistic about their long-term aims?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

17) Do they lack any ability to empathise with others?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

18) Would you regard them as essentially irresponsible?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

Total Score

Romney = 11
Obama = 27

EXCELLENT!!!!! Thank you for taking the time to answer and post this. It clearly shows the truth.

******************************************************8

Very scientific evaluation . . . . . . NOT!

I think it was just as scientific as seaoat using it. Do you not agree?

*********************************************************

No I do not agree. It is not a devaluation of alecto's post but having read numerous analysis by seaoat and having information on his extensive business experience, education and background I place more credibility in seaoat's analysis.

knothead wrote:
No I do not agree. It is not a devaluation of alecto's post but having read numerous analysis by seaoat and having information on his extensive business experience, education and background I place more credibility in seaoat's analysis.

That is the beauty of the internet, you often have trolls who make impressionable worldly claims of superior education, astute business prowess, or other tales of grandeur yet they choose to grace us with there presence on an internet forum as to enlighten us poor weary simple people. Quite simply they are full of shit. I would place very little credibility to anything I read on an internet forum especially from one who's visceral bias is so blatantly obvious. I would also include myself in there since I participate in forums for the entertainment value.

[quote="knothead"]

Rogue wrote:

knothead wrote:

Rogue wrote:

alecto wrote:I see it a little diffrent

1) Do they have problems sustaining stable relationships, personally and in business?

Romney = not at all
Obama = not at all

2) Do they frequently manipulate others to achieve selfish goals, with no consideration of the effects on those manipulated?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

3) Are they cavalier about the truth, and capable of telling lies to your face?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

4) Do they have an air of self-importance, regardless of their true standing in society?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

5) Have they no apparent sense of remorse, shame or guilt?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

6) Is their charm superficial, and capable of being switched on to suit immediate ends?

Romney = partially
Obama = fully

7) Are they easily bored and demand constant stimulation?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

Are their displays of human emotion unconvincing?

Romney = partially
Obama = partially

9) Do they enjoy taking risks, and acting on reckless impulse?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

10) Are they quick to blame others for their mistakes?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

11) As teenagers, did they resent authority, play truant and/or steal?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

12) Do they have no qualms about sponging off others?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

13) Are they quick to lose their temper?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

14) Are they sexually promiscuous?

Would like to know how seaoat figured this one out!!!

15) Do they have a belligerent, bullying manner?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

16) Are they unrealistic about their long-term aims?

Romney = fully
Obama = fully

17) Do they lack any ability to empathise with others?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

18) Would you regard them as essentially irresponsible?

Romney = not at all
Obama = fully

Total Score

Romney = 11
Obama = 27

EXCELLENT!!!!! Thank you for taking the time to answer and post this. It clearly shows the truth.

******************************************************8

Very scientific evaluation . . . . . . NOT!

I think it was just as scientific as seaoat using it. Do you not agree?

*********************************************************

No I do not agree. It is not a devaluation of alecto's post but having read numerous analysis by seaoat and having information on his extensive business experience, education and background I place more credibility in seaoat's analysis. [/quot


Thats a load of horseshit!!!! You people are amazing!!

alecto wrote:

knothead wrote:
No I do not agree. It is not a devaluation of alecto's post but having read numerous analysis by seaoat and having information on his extensive business experience, education and background I place more credibility in seaoat's analysis.

That is the beauty of the internet, you often have trolls who make impressionable worldly claims of superior education, astute business prowess, or other tales of grandeur yet they choose to grace us with there presence on an internet forum as to enlighten us poor weary simple people. Quite simply they are full of shit. I would place very little credibility to anything I read on an internet forum especially from one who's visceral bias is so blatantly obvious. I would also include myself in there since I participate in forums for the entertainment value.

*************************************************8

If your alignment and allegiance with Romney is solidified why do you not bring a coherent explanation for the endless contradictions he presents? He is either a liar or a sociopath, which is it? If you defend his chameleon repertoire then please share it as you would be the only person in the United States that would has given a credible explanation of his bizarre positions. My own feeling about seaoat is he probably has more wisdom than do you as you succumb to the mean spirited nature of a good modern day Republican.

knothead wrote:
If your alignment and allegiance with Romney is solidified why do you not bring a coherent explanation for the endless contradictions he presents? He is either a liar or a sociopath, which is it? If you defend his chameleon repertoire then please share it as you would be the only person in the United States that would has given a credible explanation of his bizarre positions. My own feeling about seaoat is he probably has more wisdom than do you as you succumb to the mean spirited nature of a good modern day Republican.

Romney is doing exactly what a politician does when he /she is seeking a political office, they pander to the people. How is this different than Obama? Did Obama not say in 2008 he was going to reduce the national debt then increased it more than any president in history then during the latest debates say he was going to lower it again. Pandering to the people lying through his teeth. Romney like every other politician including Obama or anyone else running for the presidency are all pathological liars, they all distort the truth, manipulate positions, change positions, and do just about anything to gain or maintain power. That is what politicians do. These people (Romney included) do not give a crap about you or I, they have all failed the American people. Will Romney be a better president, who knows. I am under no illusion that Romney is going to miraculously fix a damn thing and the possibility of him being a worse president than Obama is very high. Romney can talk as much crap as he like but if he wins and if he doesn't make life better at the end of 4 years his ass will be gone and I will be trashing him as often as I can.

alecto wrote:

knothead wrote:
If your alignment and allegiance with Romney is solidified why do you not bring a coherent explanation for the endless contradictions he presents? He is either a liar or a sociopath, which is it? If you defend his chameleon repertoire then please share it as you would be the only person in the United States that would has given a credible explanation of his bizarre positions. My own feeling about seaoat is he probably has more wisdom than do you as you succumb to the mean spirited nature of a good modern day Republican.

Romney is doing exactly what a politician does when he /she is seeking a political office, they pander to the people. How is this different than Obama? Did Obama not say in 2008 he was going to reduce the national debt then increased it more than any president in history then during the latest debates say he was going to lower it again. Pandering to the people lying through his teeth. Romney like every other politician including Obama or anyone else running for the presidency are all pathological liars, they all distort the truth, manipulate positions, change positions, and do just about anything to gain or maintain power. That is what politicians do. These people (Romney included) do not give a crap about you or I, they have all failed the American people. Will Romney be a better president, who knows. I am under no illusion that Romney is going to miraculously fix a damn thing and the possibility of him being a worse president than Obama is very high. Romney can talk as much crap as he like but if he wins and if he doesn't make life better at the end of 4 years his ass will be gone and I will be trashing him as often as I can.

Good post... but they really don't want answers to these questions and challenges... and they sure as hell don't want to examine their candidate. Obama never would have been their candidate in 08 had that been the case.

No my friend.....people running for president have not been pathological liars. In every election there have been slips in facts, or distortions which favor the candidate......but never in modern history has a candidate so consistently lied in a primary and a general election as Mitt Romney has done over the last year and a half. I do not have to be anyone to have my words ring true. I could be a street person living under the overpass on Avalon and 10......but if my words are true and accurate, they can stand on their own merits.

You can attack me personally, and it is a silly waste of energy because I am a ghost.....but my words.....my grasp of the facts.....and my understanding of concepts will be demonstrated in real time anybody wants to wake me up under the bridge.....but to deny that Mitt Romney is the most consistent liar in presidential history does not take a PHD in history.....it does not take somebody being a die hard democrat.....it does not take a person with a personal agenda.....it simply takes intelligence.

To suggest that President Obama has not lied would be naive. To suggest that John McCain has not lied would be naive. To suggest that President Bush has not lied would be naive. To suggest that John Kerry has not lied would be naive. To suggest that Al Gore has not lied would be naive. To suggest that Bill Clinton has not lied would be naive. To suggest that Bob Dole has not lied would be naive. To suggest that George Bush Sr. has not lied would be naive.

TO SUGGEST THAT MITT ROMNEY HAS TOLD MORE WHOPPERS THAN ALL OF THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES IN THE LAST 20 YEARS.....THAT WOULD BE A STATEMENT OF FACT.

see?

Here is another tactic by the dems. They cant defend Obama's record of charitable giving (or any other democrat really) so they derail the thread with name calling of liar liar pants on fire and sociopath, which is laughable to say the least because none of these ignorant posters are quailified to make that distinction. None of them have had the years required to train in that field and give medical opinions on mental health. The best they do is google a psych test and then administer it in the least subjective manner possible.

well actually no.....the test was copied to give the range of behaviors. I happen to believe it is making some people uncomfortable because a lay person can begin questioning Mitten's behavior. Charitable giving is also very much into the profile where the show is so important.....now what do you think Mitten did with his Sensata stock.....he donated it to a charitable trust....which guess what.....he controls. Did he give it to United Way....nope.....he gave it to a charity he controls. Now, what does this indicate.....again......and again. The man is a sociopath. The reason this condition was brought up because it is very relevant as it relates to the act of being seen giving.....being charitable.....it is all part of the same profile.

Oh, by the way.....I voted for George Bush both times, and I voted for John McCain, and if you were paying attention in 2008, I was called a Neo con....so I am not bringing these subjects up because I am against the party....I am against bad people and bad policy.......Mitt Romney is a bad person, and that is not a conclusion found on an internet test.....it is simple common sense and honesty.