Prez Obama

The following is a narrative taken from a 2008 Sunday morning televised "Meet The Press."

From Sunday's 07 Sept. 2008, 11:48:04 EST, Televised "Meet the Press" the then Senator Obama was asked about his stance on the American Flag.

General Bill Ginn, USAF (ret.), asked Obama to explain WHY he doesn't follow protocol when the National Anthem is played.
The General stated to Obama that according to the United States Code, Title 36, Chapter 10, Sec. 171...
During rendition of the national anthem, when the flag is displayed, all present (except those in uniform) are expected to stand at attention, facing the flag, with the right hand over the heart. Or, at the very least, "Stand and Face It".
NOW GET THIS !!

'Senator' Obama replied:
"As I've said about the flag pin, I don't want to be perceived as taking sides....." "There are a lot of people in the world to whom the American flag is a symbol of oppression...." "The anthem itself conveys a war-like message. You know, the bombs bursting in air, and all that sort of thing."
(ARE YOU READY FOR THIS???)
Obama continued:, "The National Anthem should be 'swapped' for something less parochial and less bellicose. I like the song 'I'd Like To Teach the World To Sing.' If that were our anthem, then I might salute it. In my opinion, we should consider reinventing our National Anthem as well as 'redesign' our Flag to better offer our enemies hope and love. It's my intention, if elected, to disarmAmerica to the level of acceptance to our Middle East Brethren. If we, as a Nation of warring people, conduct ourselves like the nations of Islam, where peace prevails - - - perhaps a state or period of mutual accord could exist between our governments ......"
"When I become President, I will seek a pact of agreement to end hostilities between those who have been at war or in a state of enmity, and a freedom from disquieting oppressive thoughts . We as a Nation, have placed upon the nations of Islam, an unfair injustice, which is WHY my wife disrespects the Flag, and she and I have attended several flag burning ceremonies in the past."
"Of course now, I have found myself about to become the President of the United States and I have put my hatred aside. I will use my power to bring CHANGE to this Nation, and offer the people a new path. My wife and I look forward to becoming our Country's First black Family. Indeed, CHANGE is about to overwhelm the United States of America."
WHAAAAT, is that???
Yes, you read it right.
I, for one, am speechless!!!
Dale Lindsborg , Washington Post

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/stance.asp



Idiot.

Who verifies if Snopes is telling the truth?

Snopes

For the past few years www.snopes.com has positioned itself, or others have labeled it as the 'tell-all, final word' on any comment, claim and e-mail.

Snopes is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers – it’s just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby and surreptitiously became a spreader of Leftist Propaganda..

Left Wing Progressives, David and Barbara Mikkelson, started the web site about 13 years ago in California’s San Fernando Valley - and have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity as Americans, believing it to be unbiased and neutral, accepted it as cetain truth. But over the past couple of years people started wondering who was behind it and what was their motivation? The reason for the questions - or skepticisms - is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issues when in fact, they have been proven wrong so often. There were criticisms that the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues but, instead, use it to promulgate their Leftist Agenda.

When I discovered that Snopes falsely claimed that Obama's Birth Certificate had been properly validated – which it has not – it was then that I realized something was askew with their research and/or their credibility – or both. It seems something is seriously wrong. Could Snopes be lying?

Then, a few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama’s birth certificate it made a big splash across the Internet. Supposedly the Mikkelsons claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort ever took place.

I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me). Thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this, I gave him Bud Gregg's contact phone numbers. Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who were willing to speak with him about it. Mikkelson lied, neither he nor his wife ever called Bud.

In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg that no one from snopes.com ever contacted anyone with State Farm. Yet snopes.com issued a statement as the 'final factual word' on the issue, as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things. Not! They are typical of the Left, passing off bogus opinions as "fact". The truth is that they are liars hoping we do not research their lies, etc…

It has been disclosed that the Mikkelsons are hard core Democrats and are extremely liberal. As we all now know, from this presidential election, liberals have a calculated, insidious agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the Internet with people pointing out the Mikkelsons liberalism revealing itself in their web site findings. Gee, what a shock!

So, I say this now to everyone who goes to www.snopes.com to get what they think to be the bottom line facts: Proceed with caution. Take what it says at face value and nothing more. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Plus, you can always Google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that's exactly what the Mikkelsons do. After all, I can personally vouch from my own experience for their 'not' fully looking into things.

For those of you that are fond of referring to Snopes as a verifier of the truth, please stop the practice. They are bold face liars promoting their own Leftist Agenda.

http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/barackobama/a/obama_anthem.htm



Morons.

http://urbanlegends.about.com

http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/o/obama-pin.htm



Imbecile.

http://www.truthorfiction.com

Stop! I'm laughing so hard it hurts!

Gunz wrote:Who verifies if Snopes is telling the truth?

UH...you don't have to believe Snopes. All you really have to do is use logic. No member of Congress would say this; it would be political suicide. Certainly, Obama didn't say it. I notice it takes a cheap shot at the First Lady as well, and is probably loosely based on the statement she made about being proud of her country once again. I felt the same way at the time, after 8 years of Bush wars and fear tactics, when our reputation on the world stage was in the tank.

Obama wasn't even on Meet the Press on September 7, 2008.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26590488/#.UIA214UcrXU

Dumbasses.

You want to use logic when discussing the activities of our Federal Government? Thats a good one FT!!!

http://www.msnbc.msn.com


Ha ha ha. Now you've gone from the frying pan into the fire! MSNBC? Seriously?




You cant make this stuff up folks!

Floridatexan wrote:

Gunz wrote:Who verifies if Snopes is telling the truth?

UH...you don't have to believe Snopes. All you really have to do is use logic. No member of Congress would say this; it would be political suicide. Certainly, Obama didn't say it. I notice it takes a cheap shot at the First Lady as well, and is probably loosely based on the statement she made about being proud of her country once again. I felt the same way at the time, after 8 years of Bush wars and fear tactics, when our reputation on the world stage was in the tank.

Knowing Obamas radical associations with terrorist, self avowed communist, and racist hate monger preachers along with his extreme ideology LOGICALLY one could see how he could have said this.

I bet its true

he\'s a muslim and hates this country