I was a huge fan of the first Freakonomics book, so I was fairly anxious to get my hands on the sequel, SuperFreakonomics, particularly because they had proposed a fairly low cost geo-engineering solution that could effectively solve our global warming problem. After having read the book, I felt they presented a strong argument in favor of geo-engineering. That is, until I read the following retort by Professor Raymond T. Pierrehumbert - a climate science professor at the University of Chicago, which is the same school at which the chief author of SuperFreakonomics is an Economics professor.
I don't think I have ever seen anyone get owned in such an airtight way as when, in the following link, Dr. Pierrehumbert blows Levitt's SuperFreakonomics passage on geo-engineering out of the water.
Here is the link:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/10/an-open-letter-to-steve-levitt/
I don't think I have ever seen anyone get owned in such an airtight way as when, in the following link, Dr. Pierrehumbert blows Levitt's SuperFreakonomics passage on geo-engineering out of the water.
Here is the link:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/10/an-open-letter-to-steve-levitt/