Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » I'd be honored to meet Kim Jong Un.

I'd be honored to meet Kim Jong Un.

3 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Guest


Guest

Says heir tRump...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ng-north-korea

Quite a gaggle of rogues we have going here...

I'd be honored to meet Kim Jong Un. 14303811

Guest


Guest

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/may/21/next-defining-campaign-issue/

"Would you be willing to meet separately, without precondition, during the first year of your administration, in Washington or anywhere else, with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea, in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?"

"I would," Obama said. "And the reason is this, that the notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them — which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration — is ridiculous."

"So, you know, for all their tough talk, one of the things you have to ask yourself is: What are George Bush and John McCain afraid of? Demanding that a country meets all your conditions before you meet with them, that's not a strategy; it's just naive, wishful thinking. I'm not afraid that we'll lose some propaganda fight with a dictator."

del.capslock

del.capslock

PkrBum wrote:http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/may/21/next-defining-campaign-issue/

"Would you be willing to meet separately, without precondition, during the first year of your administration, in Washington or anywhere else, with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea, in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?"

"I would," Obama said. "And the reason is this, that the notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them — which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration — is ridiculous."

"So, you know, for all their tough talk, one of the things you have to ask yourself is: What are George Bush and John McCain afraid of? Demanding that a country meets all your conditions before you meet with them, that's not a strategy; it's just naive, wishful thinking. I'm not afraid that we'll lose some propaganda fight with a dictator."

You post a NINE year old article and think somehow that's relevant to today?

Where was N. Korea's nuclear program at the time? How about it's ballistic missile capability? Here's the big one: WHO WAS THE LEADER OF THE COUNTRY BACK THEN?

This may come as a great shock to you but things change, outcomes are uncertain, circumstances are complex. What pertained in 2008 is no longer pertinent.

You're full of shit, PkrBitch, and you're getting pathological with your Obama obsession. Get some help.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/

Guest


Guest

What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

del.capslock

del.capslock

PkrBum wrote:What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means. Have you ever even read a serious non-fiction book, a history or a biography written by someone with real credentials?

Just like the rest of Trump's core supporters, you're a combination of ignorance and belligerence. You're too ignorant to understand the great wide world and it pisses you off because things ain't perfect. What a moron!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

It's one thing to meet with leaders to reach diplomatic objectives. It is entirely another thing to lavish praise and admiration on murderous dictators.

del.capslock

del.capslock

othershoe1030 wrote:It's one thing to meet with leaders to reach diplomatic objectives. It is entirely another thing to lavish praise and admiration on murderous dictators.

Or invite them to the White House.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/

Guest


Guest

del.capslock wrote:
PkrBum wrote:What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means.

Really? Lol... this talkingpoint is a contrived "reaction". If you can't recognize that it only reflects on you.

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

PkrBum wrote:
del.capslock wrote:
PkrBum wrote:What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means.

Really? Lol... this talkingpoint is a contrived "reaction". If you can't recognize that it only reflects on you.

re·ac·tion·ar·y
rēˈakSHəˌnerē/Submit
adjective
1.
(of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
synonyms: right-wing, conservative, rightist, ultraconservative; More
noun
noun: reactionary; plural noun: reactionaries
1.
a reactionary person.
synonyms: right-winger, conservative, rightist; More

del.capslock

del.capslock

PkrBum wrote:
del.capslock wrote:
What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means.

Really? Lol... this talkingpoint is a contrived "reaction". If you can't recognize that it only reflects on you.

The word "reactionary" has a meaning different from the word "reaction".

re·ac·tion·ar·y
rēˈakSHəˌnerē

adjective
1.
(of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
synonyms: right-wing, conservative, rightist, ultraconservative;

noun
1.
a reactionary person.
synonyms: right-winger, conservative, rightist;

You're just not very well read or educated, are you? It's okay, we'll make allowances for your self-inflicted ignorance, sparky.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/

Guest


Guest

othershoe1030 wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
del.capslock wrote:
PkrBum wrote:What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means.

Really? Lol... this talkingpoint is a contrived "reaction". If you can't recognize that it only reflects on you.

re·ac·tion·ar·y
rēˈakSHəˌnerē/Submit
adjective
1.
(of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
synonyms: right-wing, conservative, rightist, ultraconservative; More
noun
noun: reactionary; plural noun: reactionaries
1.
a reactionary person.
synonyms: right-winger, conservative, rightist; More

Nice google definition. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/reactionary

Opposing political or social progress or reform.
‘reactionary attitudes toward women's rights’

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

PkrBum wrote:
othershoe1030 wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
del.capslock wrote:
PkrBum wrote:What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means.

Really? Lol... this talkingpoint is a contrived "reaction". If you can't recognize that it only reflects on you.

re·ac·tion·ar·y
rēˈakSHəˌnerē/Submit
adjective
1.
(of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
synonyms: right-wing, conservative, rightist, ultraconservative; More
noun
noun: reactionary; plural noun: reactionaries
1.
a reactionary person.
synonyms: right-winger, conservative, rightist; More

Nice google definition. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/reactionary

Opposing political or social progress or reform.
‘reactionary attitudes toward women's rights’

Good grief! You prove our point!

The word "reactionary" has a meaning different from the word "reaction".

del.capslock

del.capslock

PkrBum wrote:
othershoe1030 wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
del.capslock wrote:
PkrBum wrote:What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means.

Really? Lol... this talkingpoint is a contrived "reaction". If you can't recognize that it only reflects on you.

re·ac·tion·ar·y
rēˈakSHəˌnerē/Submit
adjective
1.
(of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
synonyms: right-wing, conservative, rightist, ultraconservative; More
noun
noun: reactionary; plural noun: reactionaries
1.
a reactionary person.
synonyms: right-winger, conservative, rightist; More

Nice google definition. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/reactionary

Opposing political or social progress or reform.
‘reactionary attitudes toward women's rights’

The only difference is that the Oxford recognizes that "Social Liberalization"
is actually "Social Progress"!

                       LOL!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/

Guest


Guest

othershoe1030 wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
othershoe1030 wrote:
PkrBum wrote:
del.capslock wrote:
PkrBum wrote:What it makes clear... is that y'all are a bunch of duplicitous hypocritical reactionary snowflakes.

What it makes clear is that you don't even know what the word "reactionary" means.

Really? Lol... this talkingpoint is a contrived "reaction". If you can't recognize that it only reflects on you.

re·ac·tion·ar·y
rēˈakSHəˌnerē/Submit
adjective
1.
(of a person or a set of views) opposing political or social liberalization or reform.
synonyms: right-wing, conservative, rightist, ultraconservative; More
noun
noun: reactionary; plural noun: reactionaries
1.
a reactionary person.
synonyms: right-winger, conservative, rightist; More

Nice google definition. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/reactionary

Opposing political or social progress or reform.
‘reactionary attitudes toward women's rights’

Good grief! You prove our point!

The word "reactionary" has a meaning different from the word "reaction".

Oh no... I've used your word and applied it to leftists. That really pisses y'all off apparently... lol.

Tough shit.

del.capslock

del.capslock

I gotta quit this thread. It's just not fair, it's like kicking a three-legged dog.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/btraven/

Guest


Guest

Just admit it. A position that you adored from Obama... you condemn from trump... for partisan bs.

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

del.capslock wrote:I gotta quit this thread. It's just not fair, it's like kicking a three-legged dog.

It's called "alternative definitions"?

Guest


Guest

PkrBum wrote:http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2008/may/21/next-defining-campaign-issue/

"Would you be willing to meet separately, without precondition, during the first year of your administration, in Washington or anywhere else, with the leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea, in order to bridge the gap that divides our countries?"

"I would," Obama said. "And the reason is this, that the notion that somehow not talking to countries is punishment to them — which has been the guiding diplomatic principle of this administration — is ridiculous."

"So, you know, for all their tough talk, one of the things you have to ask yourself is: What are George Bush and John McCain afraid of? Demanding that a country meets all your conditions before you meet with them, that's not a strategy; it's just naive, wishful thinking. I'm not afraid that we'll lose some propaganda fight with a dictator."

inconsequential. Ancient story. Totally irrelevant to tRump today. One might say... Apples & oranges.

How deep did you have to dig to come up with nothing? LOL! Laughing

Guest


Guest

It's impressive what leftists can ignore to groupthink... and your dear leaders count on it.

Congratulations comrades... you're very useful.

Guest


Guest

PkrBum wrote:It's impressive what leftists can ignore to groupthink... and your dear leaders count on it.

Congratulations comrades... you're very useful.

You are almost as much out of touch with reality as your orange idol.

1st order of a discussion is= Stay relevant. Rolling Eyes

Sal

Sal

Offering to talk through diplomatic channels is normal.

Praising brutally thuggish dictators and inviting them to the White House is not.

Once again, Pkr proves to be the master of mindless false equivalencies.  

Guest


Guest

When y'all have to use pejoratives and call it mindless or irrelevant it just confirms my point.

Y'all had nothing but praise and adoration when Obama did nearly the same damn thing.

Lol... it's transparent. None of you can deviate from the groupthink... or even acknowledge the truth.

Sal

Sal

PkrBum wrote:When y'all have to use pejoratives and call it mindless or irrelevant it just confirms my point.

Y'all had nothing but praise and adoration when Obama did nearly the same damn thing.

Lol... it's transparent. None of you can deviate from the groupthink... or even acknowledge the truth.

There's no equivalence, dumbass.

Not even close.

Guest


Guest

Sal wrote:
PkrBum wrote:When y'all have to use pejoratives and call it mindless or irrelevant it just confirms my point.

Y'all had nothing but praise and adoration when Obama did nearly the same damn thing.

Lol... it's transparent. None of you can deviate from the groupthink... or even acknowledge the truth.

There's no equivalence, dumbass.

Not even close.

Riiiiiiiiiight... lol.

Sal

Sal

I'd be honored to meet Kim Jong Un. Trump_Honored_To_Meet_You_FINALWEB

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » I'd be honored to meet Kim Jong Un.

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum