Markle

RealLindaL wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:Keep guessing!

Well, if it's about you and Markle getting together to run a forum I sure as hell hope it isn't this one.

Sal wrote:Tiresome ...

Joanimaroni wrote:

RealLindaL wrote:I have to admit I'm getting a huge kick out of phony armchair psychologists Joani and Pkr throwing around terms like "narcissist" and "cognitive dissonance" when it's abundantly clear they don't have a clue what the terms mean nor their proper application.  Hilarious!  Keep up the comic posts, guys!  
     

What makes you think that?

RealLindaL wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

RealLindaL wrote:I have to admit I'm getting a huge kick out of phony armchair psychologists Joani and Pkr throwing around terms like "narcissist" and "cognitive dissonance" when it's abundantly clear they don't have a clue what the terms mean nor their proper application.  Hilarious!  Keep up the comic posts, guys!  
     

What makes you think that?

No, YOU'RE the one who used the term.  What valid psychological rationale do YOU have for stating that my post was "narcissistic"?  Please be specific.

PkrBum wrote:In psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental stress (discomfort) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values; when performing an action that contradicts existing beliefs, ideas, or values; or when confronted with new information that contradicts existing beliefs, ideas, and values.

I guess I was wrong in one regard... y'all don't apparently feel any discomfort holding some  to standards that you don't hold others to. You should of course... hence the "not normal" conclusion I make.

PkrBum wrote:In psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental stress (discomfort) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values; when performing an action that contradicts existing beliefs, ideas, or values; or when confronted with new information that contradicts existing beliefs, ideas, and values.

I guess I was wrong in one regard... y'all don't apparently feel any discomfort holding some  to standards that you don't hold others to. You should of course... hence the "not normal" conclusion I make.

knothead wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:In psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental stress (discomfort) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values; when performing an action that contradicts existing beliefs, ideas, or values; or when confronted with new information that contradicts existing beliefs, ideas, and values.

I guess I was wrong in one regard... y'all don't apparently feel any discomfort holding some  to standards that you don't hold others to. You should of course... hence the "not normal" conclusion I make.

"The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which low-ability individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability as much higher than it really is. Dunning and Kruger attributed this bias to a metacognitive incapacity, on the part of those with low ability, to recognize their ineptitude and evaluate their competence accurately. "



Took the words out of my mouth Boards . . . . that's exactly what I was going to say . . . . .

knothead wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:In psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental stress (discomfort) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values; when performing an action that contradicts existing beliefs, ideas, or values; or when confronted with new information that contradicts existing beliefs, ideas, and values.

I guess I was wrong in one regard... y'all don't apparently feel any discomfort holding some  to standards that you don't hold others to. You should of course... hence the "not normal" conclusion I make.

"The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which low-ability individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability as much higher than it really is. Dunning and Kruger attributed this bias to a metacognitive incapacity, on the part of those with low ability, to recognize their ineptitude and evaluate their competence accurately. "



Took the words out of my mouth Boards . . . . that's exactly what I was going to say . . . . .

RealLindaL wrote:It made me think of verbal vomit

"Verbal vomit"?  Oh, that must be a clinical term directly from your DSM-IV, yes, Joani? I didn't realize you were qualified in psychology as well as nursing.

expressed by an arrogant and pompous individual with a need to satisfy their desire for superiority

Sadly, Joani dear, your deep-seated inferiority complex is raising its ugly head again, as it does just about every time you get your mean & nasty attack face on.....  Of course I am sure that is an incorrect statement in your opinion.

Joanimaroni wrote:

RealLindaL wrote:It made me think of verbal vomit

"Verbal vomit"?  Oh, that must be a clinical term directly from your DSM-IV, yes, Joani? I didn't realize you were qualified in psychology as well as nursing.

expressed by an arrogant and pompous individual with a need to satisfy their desire for superiority

Sadly, Joani dear, your deep-seated inferiority complex is raising its ugly head again, as it does just about every time you get your mean & nasty attack face on.....  Of course I am sure that is an incorrect statement in your opinion.

And it doesn't apply to the superior attitude and pretentiousness?

I don't have a need to impress anyone, i'm conformable with who I am.

RealLindaL wrote:It made me think of verbal vomit

"Verbal vomit"?  Oh, that must be a clinical term directly from your DSM-IV, yes, Joani? I didn't realize you were qualified in psychology as well as nursing.

expressed by an arrogant and pompous individual with a need to satisfy their desire for superiority

Sadly, Joani dear, your deep-seated inferiority complex is raising its ugly head again, as it does just about every time you get your mean & nasty attack face on.....  Of course I am sure that is an incorrect statement in your opinion.

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:In psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental stress (discomfort) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values; when performing an action that contradicts existing beliefs, ideas, or values; or when confronted with new information that contradicts existing beliefs, ideas, and values.

I guess I was wrong in one regard... y'all don't apparently feel any discomfort holding some  to standards that you don't hold others to. You should of course... hence the "not normal" conclusion I make.

"The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which low-ability individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability as much higher than it really is. Dunning and Kruger attributed this bias to a metacognitive incapacity, on the part of those with low ability, to recognize their ineptitude and evaluate their competence accurately. "


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:In psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental stress (discomfort) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values; when performing an action that contradicts existing beliefs, ideas, or values; or when confronted with new information that contradicts existing beliefs, ideas, and values.

I guess I was wrong in one regard... y'all don't apparently feel any discomfort holding some  to standards that you don't hold others to. You should of course... hence the "not normal" conclusion I make.

"The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which low-ability individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability as much higher than it really is. Dunning and Kruger attributed this bias to a metacognitive incapacity, on the part of those with low ability, to recognize their ineptitude and evaluate their competence accurately. "


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Joanimaroni wrote:
And it doesn't apply to the superior attitude and pretentiousness?

I don't have a need to impress anyone, i'm conformable with who I am.

PkrBum wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:In psychology, cognitive dissonance is the mental stress (discomfort) experienced by a person who simultaneously holds two or more contradictory beliefs, ideas, or values; when performing an action that contradicts existing beliefs, ideas, or values; or when confronted with new information that contradicts existing beliefs, ideas, and values.

I guess I was wrong in one regard... y'all don't apparently feel any discomfort holding some  to standards that you don't hold others to. You should of course... hence the "not normal" conclusion I make.

"The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which low-ability individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly assessing their ability as much higher than it really is. Dunning and Kruger attributed this bias to a metacognitive incapacity, on the part of those with low ability, to recognize their ineptitude and evaluate their competence accurately. "


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect

Punk

Merriam-Webster Definition of punk.

1 archaic : prostitute. 2 [probably partly from 3punk] : nonsense, foolishness. 3a : a young inexperienced person : beginner, novice; especially : a young manb : a usually petty gangster, hoodlum, or ruffianc slang : a young man used as a homosexual partner especially in a prison.

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:
Punk

Merriam-Webster Definition of punk.

1 archaic : prostitute. 2 [probably partly from 3punk] : nonsense, foolishness. 3a : a young inexperienced person : beginner, novice; especially : a young manb : a usually petty gangster, hoodlum, or ruffianc slang : a young man used as a homosexual partner especially in a prison.

I love it when older people call me a punk. It's the reason I get out of bed each morning.

RealLindaL wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:
Punk

Merriam-Webster Definition of punk.

1 archaic : prostitute. 2 [probably partly from 3punk] : nonsense, foolishness. 3a : a young inexperienced person : beginner, novice; especially : a young manb : a usually petty gangster, hoodlum, or ruffianc slang : a young man used as a homosexual partner especially in a prison.

I love it when older people call me a punk. It's the reason I get out of bed each morning.

 

2seaoat wrote:Quoting myself: "If I had a son, he would be just like Boards."


Boards intelligence and integrity is untouchable.  We had a child porn criminal on this forum who wanted to beat me up.  He was arrested and is gone from this forum.  His posts were consistently weird.  I have the same feeling toward the absence of Markle from this forum.   I consider him an immoral individual in the same category as the child pornographer whose perverse lifestyle was responsible for horrible threads and posts on this forum.   To attack Boards for removing spam from this forum is like saying that a child pornographer should have the freedom of speech to talk about boy man relationships as political free speech protected under the first amendment.....the truth is that there are some sick puppies who have been here, and finally this forum is basically cleansed of the same which is the role of a forum administrator.   Markle was an evil fascist pervert who spammed this forum and calling Boards a "punk" for demanding morality and honesty when dealing with spam or perversity.....well I would say keep being a punk, because the forum is no longer filled with toxic hateful spam.

PkrBum wrote:
Integrity? He's a known a proven liar that uses his piss ant power as admin to target opponents.

Your use of that word to describe him debases your own.

PkrBum wrote:It's a simple matter of fact.