Telster has been banned from this forum. Joanimaroni responsible?

Joanimaroni wrote:Check your email....surely you know he is back.

As far as being from New York, inconsequential. You are right Melania was a model in her younger days, however, she is now a wife, a mother, and the soon to be First Lady.

Lot of speculation.

Tellthetruth wrote:How would you like it if someone posted a pic of your wife naked? I sure don't want to see it because she is your wife. I don't care to view pornography.

RealLindaL wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:Check your email....surely you know he is back.

As far as being from New York, inconsequential. You are right Melania was a model in her younger days, however, she is now a wife, a mother, and the soon to be First Lady.

Lot of speculation.

What email?  I haven't received anything from you.  And if Telstar is back, why isn't he posting?

Thank you for advising me as to what Melania is now.  Obviously I know all that, Joani, and it makes no difference in terms of my above statements, which I stand behind -- most especially my opinion that he deserved at least the decency of a conversation and warning.  

If Boards doesn't want nudity on the forum, then maybe he should make that a rule.  Meanwhile, I really don't feel Melania needs any special protection.  Her son will see plenty of her "artwork" and probably already has, and it's readily available to anyone else in the nation who can google.

Markle wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:I got a message from him. He's been banned for posting Melania Trump's naked picture. It was ok Chrissy posted vaginas and penises. Joani has been after him for awhile deleting his posts and making snarky remarks.

I thought the photo of Melania from when she was a model was incredibly bad taste and a sign of utter desperation.  I think a note to him to change it to something decent or be banned until he did.

I have been here a while and was on the Pensacola forum as well.  It may well have happened but I've never seen any drawings or photos of a penis or vagina.  If it happened, it should have been removed immediately.  

Wordslinger wrote:I thoroughly resent super-editing by a partisan individual regarding any words, graphics, drawings cartoons or other art a member chooses to post in support of his or her point of view.

The facts in this situation are perfectly clear:  Telstar wanted to disparage Mrs. Trump, who, in fact, worked as a professional model without proper licensing for several months and there are numerous photos of her in sexually provacative poses - including sexual three somes with other female models.

This is no different than the numerous postings of pics and drawings depicting President Obama as a Negro eating watermelon, as Hitler, etc.
There have also been slurs in this forum against "Moochelle" etc.

Let's face facts here;  First ladies are accutrements thus far of male presidents.  Presidents represent political parties and political points of view which make them and their families targets for derision from people in political opposition.  

Clearly, the decision to ban a member because of his or her use of a public photo, drawing, cartoon or other graphic selected to express that member's political perspective is grossly unfair and unjust.

It is my understanding Telstar has been reinstated.  Had that not been the case, I would have abandoned this one-sided forum as would have a number of your regulars.

As things stand, I will now work to see that the current moderators are removed.  And I won't be alone.

To ban the use of a published photo of the nude wife of President Pussy Grabber with the dead rat on his head is a clear use of politically driven editing and is unacceptable.  If you want to use selective editing then remove the title "political forum" and title the blog correctly as "meeting place for Trump supporters."  

Vikingwoman wrote:

Markle wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:I got a message from him. He's been banned for posting Melania Trump's naked picture. It was ok Chrissy posted vaginas and penises. Joani has been after him for awhile deleting his posts and making snarky remarks.

I thought the photo of Melania from when she was a model was incredibly bad taste and a sign of utter desperation.  I think a note to him to change it to something decent or be banned until he did.

I have been here a while and was on the Pensacola forum as well.  It may well have happened but I've never seen any drawings or photos of a penis or vagina.  If it happened, it should have been removed immediately.  

It was actually some sexual acts too. Joani never said a word because it was her friend. They laughed about it and all the vulgar shit that went w/ it which was worse. I dare any of you right wingers to deny it.

Wordslinger wrote:I thoroughly resent super-editing by a partisan individual regarding any words, graphics, drawings cartoons or other art a member chooses to post in support of his or her point of view.

The facts in this situation are perfectly clear:  Telstar wanted to disparage Mrs. Trump, who, in fact, worked as a professional model without proper licensing for several months and there are numerous photos of her in sexually provacative poses - including sexual three somes with other female models.

This is no different than the numerous postings of pics and drawings depicting President Obama as a Negro eating watermelon, as Hitler, etc.
There have also been slurs in this forum against "Moochelle" etc.

Let's face facts here;  First ladies are accutrements thus far of male presidents.  Presidents represent political parties and political points of view which make them and their families targets for derision from people in political opposition.  

Clearly, the decision to ban a member because of his or her use of a public photo, drawing, cartoon or other graphic selected to express that member's political perspective is grossly unfair and unjust.

It is my understanding Telstar has been reinstated.  Had that not been the case, I would have abandoned this one-sided forum as would have a number of your regulars.

As things stand, I will now work to see that the current moderators are removed.  And I won't be alone.

To ban the use of a published photo of the nude wife of President Pussy Grabber with the dead rat on his head is a clear use of politically driven editing and is unacceptable.  If you want to use selective editing then remove the title "political forum" and title the blog correctly as "meeting place for Trump supporters."  

Joanimaroni wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:I thoroughly resent super-editing by a partisan individual regarding any words, graphics, drawings cartoons or other art a member chooses to post in support of his or her point of view.

The facts in this situation are perfectly clear:  Telstar wanted to disparage Mrs. Trump, who, in fact, worked as a professional model without proper licensing for several months and there are numerous photos of her in sexually provacative poses - including sexual three somes with other female models.

This is no different than the numerous postings of pics and drawings depicting President Obama as a Negro eating watermelon, as Hitler, etc.
There have also been slurs in this forum against "Moochelle" etc.

Let's face facts here;  First ladies are accutrements thus far of male presidents.  Presidents represent political parties and political points of view which make them and their families targets for derision from people in political opposition.  

Clearly, the decision to ban a member because of his or her use of a public photo, drawing, cartoon or other graphic selected to express that member's political perspective is grossly unfair and unjust.

It is my understanding Telstar has been reinstated.  Had that not been the case, I would have abandoned this one-sided forum as would have a number of your regulars.

As things stand, I will now work to see that the current moderators are removed.  And I won't be alone.

To ban the use of a published photo of the nude wife of President Pussy Grabber with the dead rat on his head is a clear use of politically driven editing and is unacceptable.  If you want to use selective editing then remove the title "political forum" and title the blog correctly as "meeting place for Trump supporters."  

Oh please.... a nude photo expresses political perspectives?

No one said anything about the obsession Telstar had regarding Trump's penis... and a nude picture of Trump's wife doesn't have a damn thing to do with politics.

Wordslinger wrote:I thoroughly resent super-editing by a partisan individual regarding any words, graphics, drawings cartoons or other art a member chooses to post in support of his or her point of view.

The facts in this situation are perfectly clear:  Telstar wanted to disparage Mrs. Trump, who, in fact, worked as a professional model without proper licensing for several months and there are numerous photos of her in sexually provacative poses - including sexual three somes with other female models.

This is no different than the numerous postings of pics and drawings depicting President Obama as a Negro eating watermelon, as Hitler, etc.
There have also been slurs in this forum against "Moochelle" etc.

Let's face facts here;  First ladies are accutrements thus far of male presidents.  Presidents represent political parties and political points of view which make them and their families targets for derision from people in political opposition.  

Clearly, the decision to ban a member because of his or her use of a public photo, drawing, cartoon or other graphic selected to express that member's political perspective is grossly unfair and unjust.

It is my understanding Telstar has been reinstated.  Had that not been the case, I would have abandoned this one-sided forum as would have a number of your regulars.

As things stand, I will now work to see that the current moderators are removed.  And I won't be alone.

To ban the use of a published photo of the nude wife of President Pussy Grabber with the dead rat on his head is a clear use of politically driven editing and is unacceptable.  If you want to use selective editing then remove the title "political forum" and title the blog correctly as "meeting place for Trump supporters."  

Wordslinger wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:I thoroughly resent super-editing by a partisan individual regarding any words, graphics, drawings cartoons or other art a member chooses to post in support of his or her point of view.

The facts in this situation are perfectly clear:  Telstar wanted to disparage Mrs. Trump, who, in fact, worked as a professional model without proper licensing for several months and there are numerous photos of her in sexually provacative poses - including sexual three somes with other female models.

This is no different than the numerous postings of pics and drawings depicting President Obama as a Negro eating watermelon, as Hitler, etc.
There have also been slurs in this forum against "Moochelle" etc.

Let's face facts here;  First ladies are accutrements thus far of male presidents.  Presidents represent political parties and political points of view which make them and their families targets for derision from people in political opposition.  

Clearly, the decision to ban a member because of his or her use of a public photo, drawing, cartoon or other graphic selected to express that member's political perspective is grossly unfair and unjust.

It is my understanding Telstar has been reinstated.  Had that not been the case, I would have abandoned this one-sided forum as would have a number of your regulars.

As things stand, I will now work to see that the current moderators are removed.  And I won't be alone.

To ban the use of a published photo of the nude wife of President Pussy Grabber with the dead rat on his head is a clear use of politically driven editing and is unacceptable.  If you want to use selective editing then remove the title "political forum" and title the blog correctly as "meeting place for Trump supporters."  

Oh please.... a nude photo expresses political perspectives?

No one said anything about the obsession Telstar had regarding Trump's penis... and a nude picture of Trump's wife doesn't have a damn thing to do with politics.

Really?  You are a complete right wing puppet.  It was fucking okay to run representations of Michele Obama that denigrated her, her race, her family, etc.  There was a reference above to you having no problem with a representation of Mrs. Obama as a gorrila.

And using a nude photo available in the public domain in any comment or statement meant to denigrate her, her husband or any political issue is a perfectly valid and worthy usage.

Your fucking narrow, right wing "I'm better than you" snobbish taste eliminates you as any sort of responsible moderator in a political discussion setting.  

Mz. Joaniemaroni, if you had even a gram of honor, you would resign as moderator here.  But, considering you're a staunch conservative, it's foolish of us to expect you would even understand the word honor.

Reality.

Joanimaroni wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:

Markle wrote:

Vikingwoman wrote:I got a message from him. He's been banned for posting Melania Trump's naked picture. It was ok Chrissy posted vaginas and penises. Joani has been after him for awhile deleting his posts and making snarky remarks.

I thought the photo of Melania from when she was a model was incredibly bad taste and a sign of utter desperation.  I think a note to him to change it to something decent or be banned until he did.

I have been here a while and was on the Pensacola forum as well.  It may well have happened but I've never seen any drawings or photos of a penis or vagina.  If it happened, it should have been removed immediately.  

It was actually some sexual acts too. Joani never said a word because it was her friend. They laughed about it and all the vulgar shit that went w/ it which was worse. I dare any of you right wingers to deny it.

I saw it and laughed about it ?

Your hatred for Chrissy is equal to my disgust of Bill.

Wordslinger wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:I thoroughly resent super-editing by a partisan individual regarding any words, graphics, drawings cartoons or other art a member chooses to post in support of his or her point of view.

The facts in this situation are perfectly clear:  Telstar wanted to disparage Mrs. Trump, who, in fact, worked as a professional model without proper licensing for several months and there are numerous photos of her in sexually provacative poses - including sexual three somes with other female models.

This is no different than the numerous postings of pics and drawings depicting President Obama as a Negro eating watermelon, as Hitler, etc.
There have also been slurs in this forum against "Moochelle" etc.

Let's face facts here;  First ladies are accutrements thus far of male presidents.  Presidents represent political parties and political points of view which make them and their families targets for derision from people in political opposition.  

Clearly, the decision to ban a member because of his or her use of a public photo, drawing, cartoon or other graphic selected to express that member's political perspective is grossly unfair and unjust.

It is my understanding Telstar has been reinstated.  Had that not been the case, I would have abandoned this one-sided forum as would have a number of your regulars.

As things stand, I will now work to see that the current moderators are removed.  And I won't be alone.

To ban the use of a published photo of the nude wife of President Pussy Grabber with the dead rat on his head is a clear use of politically driven editing and is unacceptable.  If you want to use selective editing then remove the title "political forum" and title the blog correctly as "meeting place for Trump supporters."  

Oh please.... a nude photo expresses political perspectives?

No one said anything about the obsession Telstar had regarding Trump's penis... and a nude picture of Trump's wife doesn't have a damn thing to do with politics.

Really?  You are a complete right wing puppet.  It was fucking okay to run representations of Michele Obama that denigrated her, her race, her family, etc.  There was a reference above to you having no problem with a representation of Mrs. Obama as a gorrila.

And using a nude photo available in the public domain in any comment or statement meant to denigrate her, her husband or any political issue is a perfectly valid and worthy usage.

Your fucking narrow, right wing "I'm better than you" snobbish taste eliminates you as any sort of responsible moderator in a political discussion setting.  

Mz. Joaniemaroni, if you had even a gram of honor, you would resign as moderator here.  But, considering you're a staunch conservative, it's foolish of us to expect you would even understand the word honor.

Reality.

Vikingwoman wrote:And neither did Stromwatch,Pkr. or any of the other right wingers. But you have the unmitigated gall to be offended about a picture of Melania Trump naked?

Joanimaroni wrote:How would you know if he received a warning or not?

Joanimaroni wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:I thoroughly resent super-editing by a partisan individual regarding any words, graphics, drawings cartoons or other art a member chooses to post in support of his or her point of view.

The facts in this situation are perfectly clear:  Telstar wanted to disparage Mrs. Trump, who, in fact, worked as a professional model without proper licensing for several months and there are numerous photos of her in sexually provacative poses - including sexual three somes with other female models.

This is no different than the numerous postings of pics and drawings depicting President Obama as a Negro eating watermelon, as Hitler, etc.
There have also been slurs in this forum against "Moochelle" etc.

Let's face facts here;  First ladies are accutrements thus far of male presidents.  Presidents represent political parties and political points of view which make them and their families targets for derision from people in political opposition.  

Clearly, the decision to ban a member because of his or her use of a public photo, drawing, cartoon or other graphic selected to express that member's political perspective is grossly unfair and unjust.

It is my understanding Telstar has been reinstated.  Had that not been the case, I would have abandoned this one-sided forum as would have a number of your regulars.

As things stand, I will now work to see that the current moderators are removed.  And I won't be alone.

To ban the use of a published photo of the nude wife of President Pussy Grabber with the dead rat on his head is a clear use of politically driven editing and is unacceptable.  If you want to use selective editing then remove the title "political forum" and title the blog correctly as "meeting place for Trump supporters."  

Oh please.... a nude photo expresses political perspectives?

No one said anything about the obsession Telstar had regarding Trump's penis... and a nude picture of Trump's wife doesn't have a damn thing to do with politics.

Really?  You are a complete right wing puppet.  It was fucking okay to run representations of Michele Obama that denigrated her, her race, her family, etc.  There was a reference above to you having no problem with a representation of Mrs. Obama as a gorrila.

And using a nude photo available in the public domain in any comment or statement meant to denigrate her, her husband or any political issue is a perfectly valid and worthy usage.

Your fucking narrow, right wing "I'm better than you" snobbish taste eliminates you as any sort of responsible moderator in a political discussion setting.  

Mz. Joaniemaroni, if you had even a gram of honor, you would resign as moderator here.  But, considering you're a staunch conservative, it's foolish of us to expect you would even understand the word honor.

Reality.

I did not post pictures of Michelle Obama as a gorilla...never.

And according to you....."....using a nude photo available in the public domain in any comment or statement meant to denigrate her, her husband or any political issue is a perfectly valid and worthy usage." So, this would apply to using any photo of Michelle found on the Internet...regardless of what it depicted, correct?

Spare me your false indignation.

Wordslinger wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

Wordslinger wrote:I thoroughly resent super-editing by a partisan individual regarding any words, graphics, drawings cartoons or other art a member chooses to post in support of his or her point of view.

The facts in this situation are perfectly clear:  Telstar wanted to disparage Mrs. Trump, who, in fact, worked as a professional model without proper licensing for several months and there are numerous photos of her in sexually provacative poses - including sexual three somes with other female models.

This is no different than the numerous postings of pics and drawings depicting President Obama as a Negro eating watermelon, as Hitler, etc.
There have also been slurs in this forum against "Moochelle" etc.

Let's face facts here;  First ladies are accutrements thus far of male presidents.  Presidents represent political parties and political points of view which make them and their families targets for derision from people in political opposition.  

Clearly, the decision to ban a member because of his or her use of a public photo, drawing, cartoon or other graphic selected to express that member's political perspective is grossly unfair and unjust.

It is my understanding Telstar has been reinstated.  Had that not been the case, I would have abandoned this one-sided forum as would have a number of your regulars.

As things stand, I will now work to see that the current moderators are removed.  And I won't be alone.

To ban the use of a published photo of the nude wife of President Pussy Grabber with the dead rat on his head is a clear use of politically driven editing and is unacceptable.  If you want to use selective editing then remove the title "political forum" and title the blog correctly as "meeting place for Trump supporters."  

Oh please.... a nude photo expresses political perspectives?

No one said anything about the obsession Telstar had regarding Trump's penis... and a nude picture of Trump's wife doesn't have a damn thing to do with politics.

Really?  You are a complete right wing puppet.  It was fucking okay to run representations of Michele Obama that denigrated her, her race, her family, etc.  There was a reference above to you having no problem with a representation of Mrs. Obama as a gorrila.

And using a nude photo available in the public domain in any comment or statement meant to denigrate her, her husband or any political issue is a perfectly valid and worthy usage.

Your fucking narrow, right wing "I'm better than you" snobbish taste eliminates you as any sort of responsible moderator in a political discussion setting.  

Mz. Joaniemaroni, if you had even a gram of honor, you would resign as moderator here.  But, considering you're a staunch conservative, it's foolish of us to expect you would even understand the word honor.

Reality.

I did not post pictures of Michelle Obama as a gorilla...never.

And according to you....."....using a nude photo available in the public domain in any comment or statement meant to denigrate her, her husband or any political issue is a perfectly valid and worthy usage." So, this would apply to using any photo of Michelle found on the Internet...regardless of what it depicted, correct?

Spare me your false indignation.

False indignation?  If you find any nude pics of Michelle in a gay sexual threesome, run'm.  And you know damned well you and your racist anti-Obama crowd would run such shots with a wink and a nudge nudge in a New York minute.  Joanimaroni, in addition to being a biased moderator, you're a liar.  You tell all of us Telstar has been reinstated.  He tells me his Telstar account is still locked.

Why don't you have the strength to tell anyone the truth?

Tellthetruth wrote:Did anyone post a naked pic of Michelle? Hell no. Nuf said. Your hypocrisy is apparent.