Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

WSJ: ‘Nation Now Has Proof’ of Hillary Scandals, But Leftist Media ‘Devote Its Front Pages to the Trump Story’

4 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Markle

Markle

This comes as a great surprise to...no one.

WSJ: ‘Nation Now Has Proof’ of Hillary Scandals, But Leftist Media ‘Devote Its Front Pages to the Trump Story’

by BREITBART NEWS  14 Oct 2016

The Wall Street Journal’s Potomac Watch columnist Kimberley Strassel details the “devastating case against a Clinton presidency” that can be made by reviewing the WikiLeaks documents combined with what is already known in the public record. Strassel notes that although “the nation now has proof of pretty much everything [Hillary Clinton] has been accused of,” the media “has almost uniformly ignored the flurry of bombshells, preferring to devote its front pages” to the story that Donald Trump “made lewd remarks a decade ago and now stands accused of groping women.”

From Strassel in the Wall Street Journal:

The Obama administration—the federal government, supported by tax dollars—was working as an extension of the Clinton campaign. The State Department coordinated with her staff in responding to the email scandal, and the Justice Department kept her team informed about developments in the court case.

Worse, Mrs. Clinton’s State Department, as documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act show, took special care of donors to the Clinton Foundation. In a series of 2010 emails, a senior aide to Mrs. Clinton asked a foundation official to let her know which groups offering assistance with the Haitian earthquake relief were “FOB” (Friends of Bill) or “WJC VIPs” (William Jefferson Clinton VIPs). Those who made the cut appear to have been teed up for contracts. Those who weren’t? Routed to a standard government website.

The leaks show that the foundation was indeed the nexus of influence and money. The head of the Clinton Health Access Initiative, Ira Magaziner, suggested in a 2011 email that Bill Clinton call Sheikh Mohammed of Saudi Arabia to thank him for offering the use of a plane. In response, a top Clinton Foundation official wrote: “Unless Sheikh Mo has sent us a $6 million check, this sounds crazy to do.”

[...]

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/14/wsj-nation-now-proof-hillary-scandals-leftist-media-devote-front-pages-trump-story/

RealLindaL



Speaking of the WikiLeaks "documents" (hacked/stolen emails, not independently validated), I've asked before and will again --  and will likely still not receive any answer from the right, much less a credible one -- why, oh why, haven't any emails from the Trump campaign and its management been hacked and leaked,  hmm??

THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IS NOT STUPID, STUPID.

They also don't like Russia reading America's private emails any more than they like the NSA doing so.  This move is backfiring, plain and simple.

Markle

Markle

RealLindaL wrote:Speaking of the WikiLeaks "documents" (hacked/stolen emails, not independently validated), I've asked before and will again --  and will likely still not receive any answer from the right, much less a credible one -- why, oh why, haven't any emails from the Trump campaign and its management been hacked and leaked,  hmm??

THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IS NOT STUPID, STUPID.

They also don't like Russia reading America's private emails any more than they like the NSA doing so.  This move is backfiring, plain and simple.

Not a single Progressive has come forward and denied the validity of any of emails, not a single one.

As for why no Republican emails have been released...that's because they contain nothing illegal or of interest to anyone.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Markle wrote:
RealLindaL wrote:Speaking of the WikiLeaks "documents" (hacked/stolen emails, not independently validated), I've asked before and will again --  and will likely still not receive any answer from the right, much less a credible one -- why, oh why, haven't any emails from the Trump campaign and its management been hacked and leaked,  hmm??

THE AMERICAN PUBLIC IS NOT STUPID, STUPID.

They also don't like Russia reading America's private emails any more than they like the NSA doing so.  This move is backfiring, plain and simple.

Not a single Progressive has come forward and denied the validity of any of emails, not a single one.

As for why no Republican emails have been released...that's because they contain nothing illegal or of interest to anyone.


At this point the validity of the leaked emails isn't really in question. Again you fail to grasp the real situation: Hillary's emails are old news, Trump's sexual assaults are NEWS.

The presidential race isn't about Hillary's merits or faults, or Trump's weirdness. It's about who scares us the most.

Trump can't win.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

And who owns the Wall Street Journal?

And we already know that Breitbart News is nothing more than a political tabloid.

And Wordslinger is correct. There is nothing that Lame Dork poster Markle can do to rescue Trump's presidential bid--now on life-support and fading quickly.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum