Hillary coughing up parts of her lungs

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUrRaasNHwI

Looks like mucus to me. Saying it's "parts of her lungs" is nothing but hateful, irresponsible rumor mongering. Shame on you.

Yeah mucus filled coughing fit that would make an emphysema patient blush

She's mentally ill and physically ill... In so many ways

71% of docs think she has issues

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hillarys-health-concerns-serious-say-most-doctors-polled-by-the-association-of-american-physicians-and-surgeons-aaps-300325065.html

The frenzied minds of hate.  Maybe we need a group of docs to assess the crazy around here???

OK maybe not.

Tellthetruth wrote:71% of docs think she has issues

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hillarys-health-concerns-serious-say-most-doctors-polled-by-the-association-of-american-physicians-and-surgeons-aaps-300325065.html

An "informal survey" of whack jobs ...

The association is generally recognized as politically conservative or ultra-conservative, and its publication advocates a range of scientifically discredited hypotheses, including the belief that HIV does not cause AIDS, that being gay reduces life expectancy, that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer, and that there are links between autism and vaccinations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_American_Physicians_and_Surgeons

How informative ...

John Kennedy faced increasing levels of pain and health issues. I met Bob Dole and his courage to overcome his physical disabilities to serve was remarkable. President Roosevelt adjusted and fought his illness to serve the public. Ike had a heart attack and will always be my role model of a President..........Throughout history our Presidents who are human have fought illness. So I reject your very premise that Illness disqualifies a President. It is a strange approach where her coughing has nothing to do with her ability to execute the responsibilities of the Presidency. It is very telling as to how people think and an indicator of innate intelligence. President Reagan was spitting up blood from his lungs after a bullet damaged the same, and NOWHERE did anybody say his wound to his lung was a disqualifying event.......this is idiocy.......again and again........

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Oh come now, Sal..... You can't expect PeeDog to read mainstream media sources that do not feed into his extreme wingnut ideology.

Yeah, c'mon Sal. Get real. LOL!!!!

Presented with this choice, I would vote for a candidate who coughs a lot over one who is a Nazi. - Andy Borowitz

Trump was never called racist until this election! People just thought he wanted Obama's birth certificate because he collects paperwork. - LOLGOP

Finally some good news for Hillary. Only one more Republican Congressional committee panel on Benghazi and she wins a free mug. - Will Durst


Nation Fears Putin Could Inspire Trump to Remove Shirt. - Andy Borowitz

Gary Johnson's obliviousness about Aleppo could help him siphon off pro-ignorance voters who were formerly voting for Trump.- Andy Borowitz


You can't just go and replace generals when you feel like it, @realDonaldTrump. They're not campaign managers. Or wives. - John Fugelsang


Reminder: Conservatives endorse universal background checks for bathrooms, but not for guns.- LOLGOP

In China, President Obama had a meeting with Vladimir Putin. And before they started, Obama texted Michelle: "Going into a meeting, love you." While Putin texted the same thing to Donald Trump.- Jimmy Fallon


Trump says he wants to build an Air Force of at least 1200 fighter jets... not a very lofty goal as USAF says they have around 1700 today. - Laura Siegelman Tweet

Trump's shot at top brass rankles military circles
Any attempt to sideline top officers in one fell swoop is viewed by some retired officers and longtime Pentagon officials as undermining tradition.
By BRYAN BENDER 09/08/16 04:11 PM EDT
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
Donald Trump's broadside against the top military brass is drawing warnings of a crisis in civilian-military relations should he become commander in chief and begin bypassing generals and admirals now serving under President Barack Obama.
"It would be unprecedented," said Mackubin Thomas Owens, a retired Marine colonel and former instructor at the Naval War College. "This would be making the military into a partisan prize. The idea you are going to come in and fire all the generals and admirals would be nearly impossible for a variety of reasons, but would also be stupid."

Wednesday night, the Republican presidential nominee charged the top rungs of the officer corps have been "reduced to rubble," referring to claims that a number of senior commanders have been cowed by administration officials or removed for disagreeing with them. It's a state of affairs Trump called "embarrassing to our country."
He also said that, in drawing up a new strategy to defeat the Islamic State, he would rely on "different generals" — a position Trump's surrogates underscored on Thursday.
"Mr. Trump never said he’d fire generals," the campaign emailed POLITICO. "He said he’d have different generals advising him."
Nonetheless, any attempt to sideline top officers in one fell swoop — while the prerogative of the president — is viewed by some retired officers and longtime Pentagon officials as undermining a tradition of keeping the active-duty military out of politics as much as possible. Unfairly painting a number of generals and admirals as lackeys of Obama would erode the perception that as an institution they are independent, they said.

Those are fears that top uniformed officers themselves have expressed privately for months as they have sought — not always successfully — to deflect questions from reporters about controversial proposals put forward by Trump, including his calls to torture terrorism suspects and his questioning of the relevance of the NATO military alliance.

Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joe Dunford has also reminded all troops to stay out of the political debate.
Dunford's spokesman reiterated that position on Thursday. "We will not be commenting on any political discourse, period, regardless of where/how it was made," Navy Captain Gregory Hicks said in an email.
Others with close ties to top military leaders were far less muted about Trump's pronouncements.
"The real danger is if he starts relieving people to put his own people in right away," Peter Mansoor, a retired Army colonel who teaches military history at Ohio State University, said of Trump's comments at a Commander-in-Chief Forum hosted by NBC News Wednesday night in New York City. "You get into much more treacherous waters if the president were to relieve the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff — who has political clout of his own and a national platform — or perhaps a combatant commander, just because he wants to put his own person in."
"I think that would be very dangerous to civil-military relations in the United States going forward," he added.
Presidents actually have little influence over who becomes a general or admiral. The one and two-stars — brigadier or major generals or rear admirals — are selected in a process guided by law and overseen by military promotion boards.


However, those who rise to three-star lieutenant generals and vice admirals or four-star generals and admirals — the highest current ranks — are heavily influenced by the president, whose choices must be confirmed by the Senate.
Civilian control of the military is a bedrock of American democracy, designed to inoculate the country against military rule.
That means presidents have a long history of replacing generals for misconduct or for lack of confidence — perhaps most famously when Harry Truman fired General Douglas MacArthur during the Korean War for disobeying orders or Abraham Lincoln's sacking of numerous battlefield commanders during the American Civil War.
Trump tries to prove he was against the Iraq War
Trump tries to prove he was against the Iraq War
By LOUIS NELSON
Sour relations between the new president and the top military brass has been fairly common in recent times, said a recently retired lieutenant general who asked that he not be named.
He noted, for example, that "the Clinton administration was deeply suspicious of military advice. That changed as the administration matured."
"It was a very rocky beginning. That was true in spades in the Bush
administration," he added. "We were portrayed as Clinton's generals."
He recalled that then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld simply "stopped meeting with his senior military leaders" and even bypassed the active-duty Army to pluck out of retirement a retired general to recommend as chief of staff. "He didn't respect their advice and didn't want to hear it," the retired three-star said.
The Obama administration also has been criticized for its relationship with the top ranks and for the removal of a number of officers — including retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, one of Trump's top surrogates who was head of the Defense Intelligence Agency from 2012 to 2014.
Flynn said Thursday that Trump is "absolutely right" about how the Obama administration has treated officers like him.
"There's a severe disconnect between this White House and frankly the president and our military,” Flynn told Fox News’ Fox and Friends. “I mean, there's a lot of frustration within the ranks and there's a lot of frustration I know in the senior leadership about what we're not able to do.”




Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/trump-criticize-top-generals-fallout-227909#ixzz4JnJJfpmn
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/trump-criticize-top-generals-fallout-227909#ixzz4JnJBt4vs
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/trump-criticize-top-generals-fallout-227909#ixzz4JnIXoFr0
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook

polecat wrote:

LOVE THIS.  Abso-positively hits the proverbial nail right on the friggin' head.

RealLindaL wrote:

polecat wrote:

LOVE THIS.  Abso-positively hits the proverbial nail right on the friggin' head.

Right.The bone spur deferment boy that brags that bonkin women was his Nam.