OBAMA LIED, AMBASSADOR DIED. Al QAEDA TERRORIST ATTACKS ON 9/11

Two weeks after President Barack Hussein Obama and the administration tried to blame the assassination of our ambassador and three others on a film clip, the truth is leaking out!

Admittedly, what president would want to admit that he allowed a murderous terrorist attack on one of our embassies on the anniversary of 9/11 on his watch? They had advance warning and did nothing. After the attack began, President Obama went to bed.


Clinton Suggests Link to Qaeda Offshoot in Deadly Libya Attack
By STEVEN LEE MYERS
Published: September 26, 2012

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wednesday suggested there was a link between the Qaeda franchise in North Africa and the attack at the American diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed the American ambassador and three others. She was the highest-ranking Obama administration official to publicly make the connection, and her comments intensified what is becoming a fiercely partisan fight over whether the attack could have been prevented.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/27/world/africa/clinton-cites-clear-link-between-al-qaeda-and-attack-in-libya.html?_r=0

Of course it was a coordinated attack. I listened to the President and I listened to Secretary of State Clinton, and they never suggested that this was not a coordinated attack.....never. The UN ambassador was dead cinch incorrect in her statements and she is a member of the Obama team. However, to suggest the President said this was not a coordinated attack is simply a lie, and he made it clear that we were going to find those responsible......which clearly establishes a perp, and a path to justice.

Now, I want to simply laugh......people might as well stand over the ambassador's grave and Pizz on it.....because when you criticize his security, you attack the decedent. Do you think President Obama, or even for that matter Secretary of State are going to micro manage ambassador's field tactics in every country, let one as dynamic and volatile as Libya. Was he reckless like the ambassador to Syria where the Administration pulled him from the streets of Syria........well no......he was making absolute breakthroughs with courage and leadership, and now Mitten the Kitten and his minions are going to be tough guys, and talk about security breaches.....nonsense.....if you think that respect for America is garnered by armed camps and bombs dropping from planes....you are clueless.....this ambassador would not have ran off to France, and he would not stand up before he ran and pump up war at a Stanford counter demonstration to the Viet Nam war.....nope our ambassador would have served.....only to be second guessed by cowards and chickenhawks.....nope our hero has changed the face of Libya.....a huge foreign policy success, and doing things right means that their are risks........not like sitting in Paris for three years while others took risks to advance the interests of this country.

Markle wrote:Two weeks after President Barack Hussein Obama and the administration tried to blame the assassination of our ambassador and three others on a film clip, the truth is leaking out!

Admittedly, what president would want to admit that he allowed a murderous terrorist attack on one of our embassies on the anniversary of 9/11 on his watch? They had advance warning and did nothing. After the attack began, President Obama went to bed.


Clinton Suggests Link to Qaeda Offshoot in Deadly Libya Attack
By STEVEN LEE MYERS
Published: September 26, 2012

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton on Wednesday suggested there was a link between the Qaeda franchise in North Africa and the attack at the American diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed the American ambassador and three others. She was the highest-ranking Obama administration official to publicly make the connection, and her comments intensified what is becoming a fiercely partisan fight over whether the attack could have been prevented.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/27/world/africa/clinton-cites-clear-link-between-al-qaeda-and-attack-in-libya.html?_r=0

SO....it was Al Qaeda and was TERRORISM!...Not a SPONTANEOUS demonstration?...This administration is becoming more and more a joke on the world scene...And the lefty loons went after Romney for his comments calling this an act of cowardace and terrorism...People died and this administration doesn't even have the courage to speak the truth...and yet the sheep keep defending and spinning this amatuer in the WH...

shhh... obama is still blaming a youtube video and the media decided that romney's criticism that nite and the coincidental release of the edited 47% tape was the real news.

I guess big lies work.......they always have.....yep....thats the ticket......lets jump to a conclusion without reliable intel.....maybe we should attack Iraq......how about South Africa....GRRRRRRRRRRR let's just be tough and attack someone.......Sorry, the President and secretary of State have been spot on, and Fox News, Al Queda, the military industrial complex, and Israel are not going to create an issue out of a non issue......he said he will get the perps.....he has a proven track record of the same, but America is tired of shoot and aim. The same forces are alive and well wanting us to shoot, and now they are yelling like their hair is on fire that we now have a foreign policy where we aim first.........OH OH OH Mr. Kotter....you are taking too long to aim.......fire damn it.......we need America to dance to the special interests who have raped this country......Golly gee Mr. President....can you not see the success of shoot and aim? He may have botched domestic policy for first two years, but he has been dead cinch correct on Foreign Policy.

he's still blaming a youtube video... he did it again at the UN... c'mon. isolated extremist, workplace violence, unstable individual... why is he allergic to calling terrorism terrorism... why are you an apologist for diversion? what is gained? is it an ideological exercise? you're doing very well... with one more term he'll have you kissing your own ass.

PkrBum wrote:he's still blaming a youtube video... he did it again at the UN... c'mon. isolated extremist, workplace violence, unstable individual... why is he allergic to calling terrorism terrorism... why are you an apologist for diversion? what is gained? is it an ideological exercise? you're doing very well... with one more term he'll have you kissing your own ass.

Headlines: THEY KNEW!....From the moment of the attack and killing of Americans the COWH and the administration knew it was a planned terrorist attack...and they chose to attempt to appease and apologize in order not to OFFEND enemies of the United States....They hit the news shows and flat out lied and blamed a movie that came out in July...Again....JOKE and the laugh has been on the American People....

I'm sure the video contributed to the rage that led to the attack. Your headline, as usual, tries to make it appear that somehow Obama had foreknowledge that contributed to the death of the ambassador, or that Hillary Clinton is somehow to blame, which can't be the case. The NYT article stated that there were far more CIA in the area than was previously known. That makes me suspect CIA involvement by neocons...and an attempt to sway the election.

Floridatexan wrote:
That makes me suspect CIA involvement by neocons...and an attempt to sway the election.

Do you believe the earth is flat too? How about aircraft contrails are a government plot to control the unwashed masses through chemical dispersion?

Amazing, no wonder you support BHO in spite of all evidence for firing him at the end of this term.

2seaoat wrote:I guess big lies work.......they always have.....yep....thats the ticket......lets jump to a conclusion without reliable intel.....maybe we should attack Iraq......how about South Africa....GRRRRRRRRRRR let's just be tough and attack someone.......Sorry, the President and secretary of State have been spot on, and Fox News, Al Queda, the military industrial complex, and Israel are not going to create an issue out of a non issue......he said he will get the perps.....he has a proven track record of the same, but America is tired of shoot and aim. The same forces are alive and well wanting us to shoot, and now they are yelling like their hair is on fire that we now have a foreign policy where we aim first.........OH OH OH Mr. Kotter....you are taking too long to aim.......fire damn it.......we need America to dance to the special interests who have raped this country......Golly gee Mr. President....can you not see the success of shoot and aim? He may have botched domestic policy for first two years, but he has been dead cinch correct on Foreign Policy.

They had reliable intelligence. They were warned about 9/11 attacks. Of course the President wanted to, customarily, blame someone else. What President wants to admit that he was warned that there would be fatal terrorist attacks on the anniversary of 9/11 and HE DID NOTHING BUT GO TO BED?

NOTHING EVER is the responsibility of President Barack Hussein Obama. The President and Secretary of State were warned that there would be attacks from al Qaeda on our Embassies on the 9/11 Anniversary. NOTHING was done, no additional security was ordered for our Embassies and the doo doo is hitting the fan all over the Middle East.

Remember when President Obama told us that when he was inaugurated, the Muslim world would be pleased? Not working out so well...that leading from behind, appeasement and weakness.



http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2012/09/map-muslim-protests-around-world/56865/

salinsky wrote:

Disgusting.

No what is disgusting is a far left wingnut like FT thinking some secret "neocon CIA" cell orchestrated the attack. Of course you probably agree Sally.

Sorry, I am not a conspiracy wingnut, and usually play the skeptic on forums, but I am a student of geopolitical power, and it is crystal clear as to the why of these attacks......I do not know the who quite yet, but the why is simple.....Al Quaeda wants America to enter into some broad "crusade" where instead of specific enemies we are attacking radical Islam....and it starts with Iran, the industrial military complex has prospered over the last decade with two wars and it is in their collective interests to keep hot wars going, and finally Israel is overtly exerting leverage over the American election cycle to have us fight their battle with American wealth and blood.....we are willing to do the same when it is our mutual interest.....but right before the November election cycle we have coordinated demonstrations, violence, and a clear attack which was planned. Now how difficult is it to get to one of the many militia groups and bank your future on funding the same indirectly through multiple layers of deep agents to have any one of these why folks to become the who.

I get it....If Obama yelled terrorism and said it was Al Queda.....what if instead it was treason and the American Industrial complex was found to actively be supporting a militia group who they want to win the battle for control of Libya.....what if it was infidelity from a partner who had deep agents in militia groups and the attack on this ambassador was to stop the advances he was making among the Libyan people. What if it was an attempt to leverage our election to a quick response to Iran.

I do not know the who......and it would be foolish to follow misguided shoot then aim foreign policy which has been all too probable the last decade, rather the president needs to connect the dots....he will.....and I have strong suspicions that the who is going to have deep and longstanding impact on American foreign policy.

If Obama and his supporters keep saying it was a youtube video that was the main cause of violence, they get their foot in the door to limit free speech. Which most liberals would love and droll over. You hear the muslim "leaders" calling for a global ban on insulting islam (other religions need not apply).

It's all in the plan "The Project". Radical muslims want to destroy America from the inside, and they have a plan.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/the-project-part-i-all-totalitarian-ideologies-are-threat-to-u-s/

salinsky wrote:Wingnuts hoping and praying for a terrorist attack, and then reveling in the blood of American patriots when one occurs, because they believe they have a new line of attack on the President of United States is the most disgustingly unpatriotic spectacle to which I've ever been witness. They couldn't even wait for the bodies to return home before starting their gleeful finger-pointing.

Disgusting.

Had the arrogant President Barack Hussein Obama listened, there would have been an adequate defense at the embassies and NO ONE WOULD HAVE BEEN MURDERED and dragged through streets. ON 9/11 NO LESS.

The far left Progressives have been finger pointing at President George Walker Bush since the day President Barack Hussein Obama took office and blaming him for everything including the weather. When is President Obama responsible for ANYTHING?

2seaoat wrote:Sorry, I am not a conspiracy wingnut, and usually play the skeptic on forums, but I am a student of geopolitical power, and it is crystal clear as to the why of these attacks......I do not know the who quite yet, but the why is simple.....Al Quaeda wants America to enter into some broad "crusade" where instead of specific enemies we are attacking radical Islam....and it starts with Iran, the industrial military complex has prospered over the last decade with two wars and it is in their collective interests to keep hot wars going, and finally Israel is overtly exerting leverage over the American election cycle to have us fight their battle with American wealth and blood.....we are willing to do the same when it is our mutual interest.....but right before the November election cycle we have coordinated demonstrations, violence, and a clear attack which was planned. Now how difficult is it to get to one of the many militia groups and bank your future on funding the same indirectly through multiple layers of deep agents to have any one of these why folks to become the who.

I get it....If Obama yelled terrorism and said it was Al Queda.....what if instead it was treason and the American Industrial complex was found to actively be supporting a militia group who they want to win the battle for control of Libya.....what if it was infidelity from a partner who had deep agents in militia groups and the attack on this ambassador was to stop the advances he was making among the Libyan people. What if it was an attempt to leverage our election to a quick response to Iran.

I do not know the who......and it would be foolish to follow misguided shoot then aim foreign policy which has been all too probable the last decade, rather the president needs to connect the dots....he will.....and I have strong suspicions that the who is going to have deep and longstanding impact on American foreign policy.

Bravo, Seaoat.

They had reliable intelligence. They were warned about...9/11 attacks. Of course the President wanted to, customarily, blame someone else. What President wants to admit that he was warned that there would be fatal terrorist attacks on...9/11 and HE DID NOTHING...

NOTHING EVER is the responsibility of (George W. Bush). The President and Secretary of State were warned that there would be attacks from al Qaeda on (US soil). NOTHING was done, no additional security was ordered for the (Twin Towers, Pentagon and US flights), and the doo doo is... still...hitting the fan all over the Middle East.

---------------------------
Fixed it for ya, Markle.

Floridatexan wrote:
They had reliable intelligence. They were warned about...9/11 attacks. Of course the President wanted to, customarily, blame someone else. What President wants to admit that he was warned that there would be fatal terrorist attacks on...9/11 and HE DID NOTHING...

NOTHING EVER is the responsibility of (George W. Bush). The President and Secretary of State were warned that there would be attacks from al Qaeda on (US soil). NOTHING was done, no additional security was ordered for the (Twin Towers, Pentagon and US flights), and the doo doo is... still...hitting the fan all over the Middle East.

---------------------------
Fixed it for ya, Markle.

You know the truth but you continue to lie. Why?

Admit the truth. President Barack Hussein Obama knew about the coming attack on our embassy, on the anniversary of 9/11 and DID NOTHING.

The warnings to President George Walker Bush were GENERAL in nature, there were attacks planned, with aircraft with no date no location.

President Barack Hussein Obama KNEW, then went to bed.

Once again for the very, very S-L-O-W!
As you well know, President William Jefferson Clinton erected a wall of silence between each of the 16 or 17 intelligence agencies so they were NOT able to communicate. That was the fatal error.

The agency who learned that Muslim's were taking flight lessons, and not particularly interested in landing or taking off, were NOT allowed to communicate that information to the agency that learned that al Qaeda was planning to use aircraft to launch a terrorist attack. Yet another agency that picked up increased "chatter" concerning an attack, could not communicate that to the other agencies and on, and on and on.

There was NO LEGAL WAY for them to connect the dots. It was done in the interest of security. Someone in one agency, would not find out what was known in another.

Legislation put forth by President George Walker Bush, and a new oversight agency created after the attack, remedied this fatal error and gathers intelligence from all agencies. How many fatal Islamic Terrorist attacks...until President Barack Hussein Obama, have we had since?

panetta today admits it's a terrorist attack. the libyan leader admitted as much that it was a terrorist attack. our intelligence now concedes that we knew it was a terrorist attack within 24hrs... wtf are you idiots still fighting? obama refused to admit that proper precautions were taken on the random day of 9/11... any idiot that buys into the obfuscation is beyond any future credibility. you are relegated to a propagandist.

This is a BIG deal that they want to ignore.

it has been proven they knew about the threats, and even if they didnt have the cia information, it was 911 and that country had just not long ago had a uprising. It was negligence of themto not have appropriet guards there and other high alrm security.

and then to try and blame it on something else, which might have put that person in danger now that its so publisized.

And then make a statement that it was just a dump in the road, then make another staement that it work related endangerment.

and the media keeps sugar coating it. hop disgusting. Its sickning to see how they lie and get away with it

It never ceases to amaze me how many coconuts are on this forum.

Dreamsglore wrote:It never ceases to amaze me how many coconuts are on this forum.

so when you see me you think about my boobs dont you.........

Rogue wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:It never ceases to amaze me how many coconuts are on this forum.

so when you see me you think about my boobs dont you.........

Why would you ask a question like that? I'm not a lesbian. I have my own boobs,dork.

Rogue wrote:This is a BIG deal that they want to ignore.

it has been proven they knew about the threats, and even if they didnt have the cia information, it was 911 and that country had just not long ago had a uprising. It was negligence of themto not have appropriet guards there and other high alrm security.

and then to try and blame it on something else, which might have put that person in danger now that its so publisized.

And then make a statement that it was just a dump in the road, then make another staement that it work related endangerment.

and the media keeps sugar coating it. hop disgusting. Its sickning to see how they lie and get away with it

Only a jackass in the MIddle east would not have extra security in 9-11.

Dreamsglore wrote:

Rogue wrote:

Dreamsglore wrote:It never ceases to amaze me how many coconuts are on this forum.

so when you see me you think about my boobs dont you.........

Why would you ask a question like that? I'm not a lesbian. I have my own boobs,dork.

And that is where your brains are obviously.