Meet the Man Who is Prepared to Spend $100 Million to Defeat Obama in His Own Words

salinsky wrote:This man is going to want something for that $100 million, and at the top of his agenda is a war with Iran.
A vote for Romney is a vote for perpetual war in the Middle East.

Adelson owns a newspaper in Israel, 'Israel HaYom,' that backs conservative Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and adamantly opposes any peace settlement with the Palestinians.

But while Adelson and Gingrich have bonded on the issue of a hawkish Mideast policy, especially over the threat of a nuclear Iran, some of the casino mogul’s comments could prove embarrassing.

In a talk to an Israeli group in July, 2010, Adelson said he wished he had served in the Israeli Army rather than the U.S. military—and that he hoped his young son would come back to Israel and “be a sniper for the IDF,” a reference to the Israel Defense Forces. (YouTube video of speech)

“I am not Israeli. The uniform that I wore in the military, unfortunately, was not an Israeli uniform. It was an American uniform, although my wife was in the IDF and one of my daughters was in the IDF ... our two little boys, one of whom will be bar mitzvahed tomorrow, hopefully he’ll come back-- his hobby is shooting -- and he’ll come back and be a sniper for the IDF,” Adelson said at the event.

“All we care about is being good Zionists, being good citizens of Israel, because even though I am not Israeli born, Israel is in my heart,” he said toward the end of his talk.

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/01/27/10249298-gingrich-funder-isnt-trying-to-buy-the-presidency-aide-says

salinsky wrote:

chrissy8 wrote:

salinsky wrote:

You seem to think this is relative. Why?

Israel is a Democracy and our best friend in one of the most volatile places in the world. How is President Barack Hussein Obama's offensive treatment of Israel a good thing?

salinsky wrote:

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

salinsky wrote:

Relative?? I think it's relevant, because a right-wing fascist is willing to contribute $100 million dollars to an agenda that is not in the interest of the welfare of the United States.

Good post!

Markle wrote:

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

salinsky wrote:

Relative?? I think it's relevant, because a right-wing fascist is willing to contribute $100 million dollars to an agenda that is not in the interest of the welfare of the United States.

Good post!

relative (ˈrɛlətɪv)

— adj (foll by to )

1. having meaning or significance only in relation to something else; not absolute: a relative value

2. ( prenominal ) Compare absolute (of a scientific quantity) being measured or stated relative to some other substance or measurement: relative humidity ; relative density

3. ( prenominal ) comparative or respective: the relative qualities of speed and accuracy

4. in proportion (to); corresponding (to): earnings relative to production

5. having reference (to); pertinent (to): matters not relative to the topic under discussion

salinsky wrote:

Markle wrote:

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

salinsky wrote:

Relative?? I think it's relevant, because a right-wing fascist is willing to contribute $100 million dollars to an agenda that is not in the interest of the welfare of the United States.

Good post!

relative (ˈrɛlətɪv)

— adj (foll by to )

1. having meaning or significance only in relation to something else; not absolute: a relative value

2. ( prenominal ) Compare absolute (of a scientific quantity) being measured or stated relative to some other substance or measurement: relative humidity ; relative density

3. ( prenominal ) comparative or respective: the relative qualities of speed and accuracy

4. in proportion (to); corresponding (to): earnings relative to production

5. having reference (to); pertinent (to): matters not relative to the topic under discussion

I authored the OP, brain trust. So, relative to what precisely?

ROTFLMAO!!!

chrissy8 wrote:

salinsky wrote:

Markle wrote:

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

salinsky wrote:

Relative?? I think it's relevant, because a right-wing fascist is willing to contribute $100 million dollars to an agenda that is not in the interest of the welfare of the United States.

Good post!

relative (ˈrɛlətɪv)

— adj (foll by to )

1. having meaning or significance only in relation to something else; not absolute: a relative value

2. ( prenominal ) Compare absolute (of a scientific quantity) being measured or stated relative to some other substance or measurement: relative humidity ; relative density

3. ( prenominal ) comparative or respective: the relative qualities of speed and accuracy

4. in proportion (to); corresponding (to): earnings relative to production

5. having reference (to); pertinent (to): matters not relative to the topic under discussion

I authored the OP, brain trust. So, relative to what precisely?

ROTFLMAO!!!

the relation is you dont seem to have a problem with the millions and millions of far lefties who donate to obama;s campign but yet you cry about this man. Dont you feel a little hypocritical? you should.

salinsky wrote:

chrissy8 wrote:

salinsky wrote:

You seem to think this is relative. Why?

Israel is a Democracy and our best friend in one of the most volatile places in the world. How is President Barack Hussein Obama's offensive treatment of Israel a good thing?

Relative?? I think it's relevant, because a right-wing fascist is willing to contribute $100 million dollars to an agenda that is not in the interest of the welfare of the United States.