Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Form OF 109 DID Hillary Clinton sign the required Separation Agreement when she left the State Department.

+3
Floridatexan
KarlRove
Markle
7 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Go down  Message [Page 2 of 2]

Markle

Markle

Sal wrote:Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell didn't sign the forms either.

Form OF 109  DID Hillary Clinton sign the required Separation Agreement when she left the State Department. - Page 2 AnimatedLaughterPink

Sounds like your on the kindergarten playground!

Which of those two Secretary's of State kept transacted all their official business on their private email and on their private email server?

We'll patiently wait for you to return with that information.

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell didn't sign the forms either.


Yea, but they did not take the mattress tags off in the White House.....the looney tune chase of Hillary is hilarious......it is like a couple of fifth graders in their tree house are developing strategy on how they are going to catch the rabbit in the back yard.......except the fifth graders actually know what they are doing.

What happened to your claim that ALL that information, on her private server are her personal property?

Maybe Al "snake oil salesman" Gore will take her place!

2seaoat



Powell did, and when asked for those emails.......he did not have them.......

So it appears that the logical fallacy which was set forth by you has been proven that two recent SOS did not sign the form, and one was not even able to turn over emails when requested........a complete bogus debate.

People are starting to talk about Whitewater and the millions spent to try to get the Clintons.........only to end up getting folks pushing for the investigations not being reelected.

What will be the next Clinton scandal?

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:Powell did, and when asked for those emails.......he did not have them.......

So it appears that the logical fallacy which was set forth by you has been proven that two recent SOS did not sign the form, and one was not even able to turn over emails when requested........a complete bogus debate.

People are starting to talk about Whitewater and the millions spent to try to get the Clintons.........only to end up getting folks pushing for the investigations not being reelected.

What will be the next Clinton scandal?

Keep wishing. This has legs and is going to be around a long time. Keep your spirits up.

Who is plan "B"? Al "Snake Oil Salesman" Gore? Could he afford the pay cut?

2seaoat



This has legs and is going to be around a long time.

They claimed the same on Whitewater.....nada....nothing. Next scandal......Benghazi.......nada nothing......next scandal......private server........nada nothing.......did not fill out a form......nada nothing......but the mattress tags being taken out of the White House.......Joe Dirt says Pay dirt.

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote: This has legs and is going to be around a long time.

They claimed the same on Whitewater.....nada....nothing.  Next scandal......Benghazi.......nada nothing......next scandal......private server........nada nothing.......did not fill out a form......nada nothing......but the mattress tags being taken out of the White House.......Joe Dirt says Pay dirt.

Benghazi is still swirling and depends on what emails Hillary erased.

As for the OTHER scandals of Whitewater and the Clinton's.

In addition to the Impeachment of President Clinton for felony perjury.

These are the results and convictions of the various investigations into President Clinton.

Whitewater

Arkansas Gov. Jim Guy Tucker - fraud felony convictions - 3 counts (Tucker resigned facing impeachment)

Jim McDougal - fraud and conspiracy felony convictions - 18 counts

Susan McDougal - felony - 4 counts (pardoned during Clinton's last minute pardongate payoffs)

William J. Marks Sr - conspiracy Stephen Smith - conspiracy

Larry Kuca - Fraud Neal Ainley - 2 misdemeanors for embezzlement

David Hale - guilty plea - conspiracy

Chris Wade - felony - Whitewater real-estate investor

John Haley - felony 1998 on fraud

Robert Palmer - felony for conspiracy

Charles Matthews - guilty plea for bribery

Eugene Fitzhugh - Whitewater - bribery

Webster Hubbell - #2 ranking Justice Dept. Official - felony for embezzlement and fraud

John Latham - CEO of Madison Bank - bank fraud Campaign Finance:

Johnny Chung - Clinton cronie - felony guilty plea - funneling money from China

Gene Lum - convicted - felony for money laundering for the DNC

Nora Lum - convicted - felony for money laundering for the DNC

Howard Glicken - guilty plea - 2 midemeanors - funneling foreign donations

Yah Lin "Charlie" Trie - guilty plea - illegal Clinton campaign donations

John Huang - Clinton cronie - felony guilty plea - funneling money from China

Paula Jonesgate:

William Jefferson Clinton - found guilty - civil contempt of court - lying under oath about material facts. The Office of the Independent Council further presented Clinton with an agreement that had him disbarred from practicing law for 5 years and made him signed statement admitting to his deception

Post Administration
Sandy Bergergate

Sandy Berger – Clinton National Security Adviser -- found guilty of stealing highly class documents from the National Archive and destroying them.

2seaoat



Benghazi committee found nothing. So who would she send an email to which would be relevant to a Benghazi investigation......a government official. You do understand they have subpoenaed these records and found nothing, and this means no email from Clinton which contradicted the truth. Why do you think she erased something if the person receiving her email most certainly had to be a government line employee if Hillary had any culpability......another logical fallacy......you really do not understand what you are arguing, or you are foolish and naive as to how email works......so please tell me about erased email where she sent the same to a government official?

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:Benghazi committee found nothing.  So who would she send an email to which would be relevant to a Benghazi investigation......a government official.  You do understand they have subpoenaed these records and found nothing, and this means no email from Clinton which contradicted the truth.   Why do you think she erased something if the person receiving her email most certainly had to be a government line employee if Hillary had any culpability......another logical fallacy......you really do not understand what you are arguing, or you are foolish and naive as to how email works......so please tell me about erased email where she sent the same to a government official?

Benghazi committee is not finished. They have not gotten the records, they are in the Clinton basement.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 2]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum