KarlRove wrote: othershoe1030 wrote: KarlRove wrote:Othershoe the military gets told what to fund by Congress. Remember we have civilian control of military on this country,
Exactly correct, unfortunately because many of the procurement programs employ a lot of high paid people and are distributed in nearly every district in the country the Congress keeps voting to continue programs that the military does not need or want.
The political conversation is rigged now so that anyone speaking out against waste in the military budget is automatically labeled a commie and anti-American. With a set up like that coupled with the jobs angle and Congress just keeps spending on things no one needs. Ironically they keep squawking about the debt while voting for more of it.
My idea for a cure for this situation, at least in part, would be to convert some of these high tech companies from war materials to energy saving technologies such as renewable energy products, new battery technology, better insulating materials. These are all things we could use here in this country. It would create a lot of new jobs and if we got good enough at it maybe even export products abroad.
Yes lets throw batteries at ISIS and see how that goes...
The military took all the hits on sequestration. Let's trim something else first.
Anytime we are good at anything, employers move folks overseas for cheaper labor. Most nearly all defense stuff is made here and the jobs we do have are well paying so no I am not for shitcanning them just to make some made up funny business for you envirowhackos
First of all if we'd kept our noses out of Iraq and Afghanistan to begin with there likely wouldn't be any ISIS today to throw anything at.
The military most certainly DID NOT take all the hits required by the sequestration.The Budget Control Act (BCA) of 2011 imposed caps on discretionary programs that will reduce their funding by more than $1 trillion over the ten years from 2012 through 2021, relative to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) baseline from 2010. It also established a Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to propose legislation reducing deficits by another $1.2 trillion over that period, and established a backup “sequestration” procedure to increase the incentive on the Joint Committee to reach a compromise. Because the Joint Committee failed to achieve its goal, sequestration — a form of automatic cuts that apply largely across the board — is now scheduled to occur starting in January 2013 and to cover the period through 2021.
Part 1 of this report outlines how these across-the-board cuts will work in 2013. Part 2 describes how they will work from 2014 through 2021. As explained below, the process for 2013 is substantially different from that for the ensuing eight years.
Broadly speaking, for 2013 the across-the-board cuts will mean about an 8.4 percent cut in most affected non-defense discretionary programs, a 7.5 percent cut in affected defense programs, an 8.0 percent cut in affected mandatory programs other than Medicare, and a 2.0 percent cut in Medicare provider payments. For 2014 through 2021, the Medicare cut will remain at 2 percent while the percentage cuts in other programs will gradually shrink. These estimates — which are revised from estimates in our December 2, 2011, analysis — take into account new CBO budget projections and the details of the President’s funding requests for 2013.
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/?fa=view&id=3635
Manufacturing jobs in the past have gone overseas but this article explains several reasons why the trend is reversing with jobs returning to this country. 6. Public policy and abundance. The federal government appears to be seizing the opportunity to promote job growth at home. In his State of the Union address, President Barack Obama kept his focus on the strategic importance of energy independence and maintained his commitment to an all-of-the-above energy strategy. This bodes well for new efforts to increase use of non-food raw materials to produce energy and chemicals.
The president's push for individual technology development centers in Youngstown, Ohio, and elsewhere marks a positive move.The idea was generated by the business community and borrows a page from efforts in China, where the government strategically places manufacturing sites in areas that need to be developed.
These policy initiatives, coupled with American abundance in natural resources such as water, agricultural products, timber,minerals and other materials, sets the U.S. at the epicenter of the next industrial and innovation revolution.
Moving to capitalize on these factors, DSM and ethanol giant Poet LLc formed Poet DSM Advanced Biofuels last year and are now building a facility in Emmetsburg, Iowa, which will have the capacity to produce 25 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol a year.The fuel will be made from corn stover, the plant matter left over from growing corn, and does not compete with food or feed. Code-named Project Liberty, the facility and the dozens like it to follow will meaningfully contribute to energy independence and will create, in time, thousands of new American jobs that cannot be outsourced. Use of renewable feed stocks promises to deliver a new industrial revolution in America as we learn to live off the land once again and move away from hydrocarbons drilled out of the ground. It takes nature 10,000 years to produce energy from plants; DSM can do it in a week right here in the U.S.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/manufacturing-jobs-returning-to-america-2013-2#ixzz3NhzHAnH4
So called "conservatives" need to update their talking points to include current data. Why aren't "conservatives" more interested in conserving, conserving American jobs and conserving the environment?