Home
Make this video full screen. At 1:38 you will very plainly see that the collapse begins at the impact floors. You can clearly see the top of the skyscraper collapsing ONTO the rest of the building below the impact floors and the lower part of the building (below this point) is not collapsing.
If there had been an explosive demolition (the so-called "controlled demolition"), this is proof positive that it would necessarily have been made to happen at the level of the building which was struck by the airliner.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-BtquTKw78&feature=list_other&playnext=1&list=AL94UKMTqg-9Cv-gndTbM6NFCwjusej4X_
Think about this. The pilot was having to maneuver this airliner flying at 500 mph. If you were the "conspirators", how in god's name could you have counted on the airliner hitting the building at the desired level? And you would know that if it did not hit at that level, then you would have a helluva lot of splain to do, Lucy, when these inevitable videos show the world that the collapse began at a point DIFFERENT from where the airliner hits the building. Would you have left that to uncertainty?
And if your explanation is that the "controlled demolition" was so elaborate that explosives were put at every level of the building so the collapse could be triggered at any desired level, then that is so far-fetched that it makes me laugh.
If there had been an explosive demolition (the so-called "controlled demolition"), this is proof positive that it would necessarily have been made to happen at the level of the building which was struck by the airliner.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-BtquTKw78&feature=list_other&playnext=1&list=AL94UKMTqg-9Cv-gndTbM6NFCwjusej4X_
Think about this. The pilot was having to maneuver this airliner flying at 500 mph. If you were the "conspirators", how in god's name could you have counted on the airliner hitting the building at the desired level? And you would know that if it did not hit at that level, then you would have a helluva lot of splain to do, Lucy, when these inevitable videos show the world that the collapse began at a point DIFFERENT from where the airliner hits the building. Would you have left that to uncertainty?
And if your explanation is that the "controlled demolition" was so elaborate that explosives were put at every level of the building so the collapse could be triggered at any desired level, then that is so far-fetched that it makes me laugh.
