46 US Senators voted to give your gun rights to the UN

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Apparently North Korea, Syria, Iran, congressional Republicans, Chrissy, and Pace share a parallel universe.

They are lost somewhere in the Delta Quadrant.......  

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Apparently North Korea, Syria, Iran, congressional Republicans, Chrissy, and Pace share a parallel universe.

They are lost somewhere in the Delta Quadrant.......  

International thugs and gun-runners (i.e., terrorists) love these folks.

2seaoat wrote:Article 8
Import
1. Each importing State Party shall take measures to ensure that
appropriate and relevant information is provided, upon request, pursuant to its
national laws,

Chrissy, Pace, and Mr. Markle.  I think your concern is real.  However, would you please show me under our national laws where gun information first has been collected other than a foid data, and where specifically our national laws authorize the turn over of that data.  If people would simply read, it requires this nation to pass a law which turns the data over to the UN.  This language was inserted into the treaty to protect the confidentiality of the Foid data, but if our legislators and the president sign a bill allowing under our national laws to give that data to the UN it would happen.   There is nothing in our statutes which allows the executive branch to turn over that data.  This would have to be a law passed.  Please show me the statutory language which allows Foid data to be disclosed to anyone?

I think the idiocy of the propaganda is only doing one thing......it is appealing to very stupid people, and based on the volume and frequency of this type of idiotic propaganda, the manipulators must figure the American people are stupid.  Fortunately we are neither stupid, nor do we lack common sense.   Attempts to track illegal gun runners are a good thing for the world and a very bad thing for gun and death merchants.  Therefore to create the illusion that a treaty will supersede American law serves to sell more guns and by pouring money into those campaigns which can confuse the American voter will yield greater profits.    

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Sal. Shut up

Sal wrote:The three pillars continuing to hold the Republican Party in place are fear, hatred, and stupidity.

They have nothing else to offer.

2seaoat wrote:why do you feel like the USA needs to have the UN monitor us on ANYTHING?

Let's say that a manufacturing company is producing automatic weapons which it wants to export to Australia where a faction group is attempting to overthrow the government.  The path to directly export the same to that group is blocked, yet a private broker may be able to bypass United States law by the manufacturer selling the guns to the broker, who attempts to illegally get those guns into Australia.   With each nation cooperating with collecting data and having a central repository which is a historical paradigm for comprehensive data collection by national governments where they have individual states, each participating country can get data to help them prosecute and find illegal smugglers.

This has nothing to do with taking rights away under the second amendment.  Again 8 x 0 =0  and 3 x 0=0........the zero is the clear amendment to the treaty required by the United States which lets our participation be dictated by our national laws.   The treaty is the 8, and no treaty is a 3......in both cases the answer is still zero.   Reading and math are simple.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

Dot wrote:part og the name of the damn bill they voted on says to uphold the second amd rights. did you even look at the government link?

snopes is nothing but two libs who believe in fairy dust lol dumbasses I swear lol

There are dumbasses on this forum, but I don't think Seaoat is one of them....