Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

the dictator now telling bussiness owners how to run thier bussiness

3 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Guest


Guest

THOUGHT POLICE: FIRMS MUST SWEAR OBAMACARE NOT A FACTOR IN FIRINGS
Is the latest delay of ObamaCare regulations politically motivated? Consider what administration officials announcing the new exemption for medium-sized employers had to say about firms that might fire workers to get under the threshold and avoid hugely expensive new requirements of the law. Obama officials made clear in a press briefing that firms would not be allowed to lay off workers to get into the preferred class of those businesses with 50 to 99 employees. How will the feds know what employers were thinking when hiring and firing? Simple. Firms will be required to certify to the IRS – under penalty of perjury – that ObamaCare was not a motivating factor in their staffing decisions. To avoid ObamaCare costs you must swear that you are not trying to avoid ObamaCare costs. You can duck the law, but only if you promise not to say so.

[“That's the good thing about being president. I can do whatever I want.” – President Obama joking about getting a restricted-access tour of Thomas Jefferson’s Monticello
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/02/11/thought-police-firms-must-swear-obamacare-not-factor-in-firings/

and not just by regulations, but on financial decisions.

Guest


Guest

It's starting to remind me of stalin's five year plan.

dumpcare



Obummer should have kept his mouth shut, this would have worked out under age old laws of ERISA, where you cannot take a full time employee and make part time solely for the purpose of reducing benefits, big fine. He is pretty dumb.

2seaoat



President Obama is neither dumb, nor is the remedy an either or proposition of ERISA or the affordable Care act sanctions applying.......both can apply concurrently and both have a sound policy nexus. There may be many statues which are violated when a person fires a person because of their race or gender, but to suggest that the specific language in a regulation or rule should be stricken because another rule is concurrent is incorrect in both statutory construction and application.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


It's "business". If you're going to talk about "business", at least learn to spell it...oh, and it's "their".

Guest


Guest

PkrBum wrote:It's starting to remind me of stalin's five year plan.

yep

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum