This liberal progressive mainstream media propaganda rag is making excuses for all the lazy shiftless democrats who don't want to work.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304027204579334610097660366?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702304027204579334610097660366.html

Bob I think you need a subscription to read the story...but thanks anyway.

It came right up for me.  But try to see it this way.  Go to this google page and then click on the Wall Street Journal link which says "More Men in Prime Working Ages Don't have Jobs".


https://www.google.com/search?q=wsj+men+in&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Take those food stamps and unemployment checks and obamaphones and all the other government handouts away from these lazy white jackoffs, and you'll quickly see every one of them get off their asses and get a job.

Are you sure they won't just sit there and suffer until they die?

The WSJ isn't what it used to be, since it was bought by Murdoch in 2007. I couldn't read the article, but found this:

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2014/02/1-6-men-prime-working-years-dont-job.html

which makes the valid point (from the WSJ article) that:

"...The trend has been building for decades, according to government data. In the early 1970s, just 6% of American men ages 25 to 54 were without jobs. By late 2007, it was 13%. In 2009, during the worst of the recession, nearly 20% didn’t have jobs..."

Outsourcing...corporate raiding...bank bailouts..."house of cards" derivatives & other exotic Wall Street gambling...horribly skewed tax code...financial usury...international monetary interest rate fixing...ridiculous estate tax threshold...periodic tax amnesty for global corporations...government subsidies to oil & gas & agriculture...corporate ability to (let's be honest) BUY political influence...

I always loved reading the WSJ...until Rupert Murdoch bought it in 2007.

Lots of revelations in this article:

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2011/jul/13/wall-st-journal-murdoch-bancroft

Former Wall St Journal owners: 'We wouldn't have sold if we had known'
Bancroft family members, who controlled Dow Jones & Company, say they would have resisted Murdoch bid in 2007

"...The Wall Street Journal is the top-selling daily newspaper in the United States and a brand with global prominence. Founded in 1889, it long dominated American business publishing, becoming the country's first national newspaper. It routinely ranked in surveys as America's most trusted print publication.

The Bancroft family owned Dow Jones from 1902 and controlled it as a publicly traded company from 1963. Murdoch's bid was attractive. He offered $60 a share, a 67% premium, $2.25bn above the market price the day his offer was announced, at a time when newspaper share prices had been flagging for more than two years. Moreover, 14 months after the deal closed, in early 2009, News Corp had to write down the value of its $5.6bn purchase by $2.8bn.

The sale was contentious. Family members questioned Murdoch's journalistic practices and insisted on appointment of an independent panel to help safeguard the paper's ethics. There was negative press in the US about Murdoch at the time of the deal in 2007, although nothing to compare with the recent revelations..."

-------------------

Rupert Murdoch = FAUX NEWS