Martin Luther King Day

How far have we really come?
http://fansided.com/2014/01/20/richard-sherman-angry-post-game-interview-leads-predictable-racist-tweets/??utm_source=Fox%20Sports&utm_medium=taboola&utm_campaign=Fox%20Sports

2seaoat wrote:How far have we really come?
http://fansided.com/2014/01/20/richard-sherman-angry-post-game-interview-leads-predictable-racist-tweets/??utm_source=Fox%20Sports&utm_medium=taboola&utm_campaign=Fox%20Sports

If I had a dog as ugly as this nasty looking Neanderthal throwback I would shave his ass and teach him to walk backwards.

Completely hyped up after a tremendous win. He never once said anything that required bleeping. He focused on the camera and made his comments while on an emotional and physical high. That's what he does....he does it before and during games to keep himself and his team pumped.

It pumps up the other team too. After the game it would be better sportsmanship to tone it down some.

Joanimaroni wrote:Completely hyped up after a tremendous win. He never once said anything that required bleeping.  He focused on the camera and made his comments while on an emotional and physical high.  That's what he does....he does it before and during games to keep himself and his team pumped.

His team just won. His team is going to the Super Bowl. His comments are only about himself and how great he is.   

QueenOfHearts wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:Completely hyped up after a tremendous win. He never once said anything that required bleeping.  He focused on the camera and made his comments while on an emotional and physical high.  That's what he does....he does it before and during games to keep himself and his team pumped.

His team just won.  His team is going to the Super Bowl.  His comments are only about himself and how great he is.    

His comments should have been about him and his team......not about Crabtree.

No class . . . . none . . !!!

No, he tried to shake hands with crabtree immediately after the play and crabtree pushed him by his face mask, I would have said the same thing. He said nothing wrong.

I'm torn on this one.....

Sherman did not exhibit any class during his on field interview.......he did not have his emotions intact and did not control his frustrations after having been rejected by Crabtree. Hard to do I imagine, when you consider the facts..he just made an incredible play that won his team a Super Bowl spot. Crabtree on the other hand missed the oppurtunity to put his team in the Super Bowl....everything their teams worked for all season came down to a win or lose play.......a play that was literally worth millions.

Having class goes hand in hand with self control. We all get emotionally upset and frustrated....all of us. It is part of life. How we handle our impulses, emotions,  and frustrations sets us apart. Personal development and class......that is the key to being able to exhibit self control.....without it you cannot keep your emotions, mood, and impulses under any  control. We've all seen people that can not control themselves....on a regular basis they lose it....sometimes over nothing at all.


SELF-CONTROL-- Sherman's off field interview was relaxed and controlled....quite different from his on field explosive reaction....a reaction that was loud and not very favorable towards Crabtree. However, he remained focused and expressed his feeling without being bleeped at all. Hot headed--emotional but still very condescending to Crabtree.


In edit....his actions and words were an embarrassment to himself, his teammates and the organization. He needs to work on his personal development.

I didn't watch any of this or know the story but stupid people want these men to go on the field and hit like Buffalo and battle to victory and when they get their blood up they say shame on them. It's like expecting a gladiator to act civil after killing a guy that just tried to gut him.

knothead wrote:No class . . . . none . . !!!

  

2seaoat wrote:How far have we really come?
http://fansided.com/2014/01/20/richard-sherman-angry-post-game-interview-leads-predictable-racist-tweets/??utm_source=Fox%20Sports&utm_medium=taboola&utm_campaign=Fox%20Sports

Other than showing you're one of the most racist people on this site, what in the world does Martin Luther King Day have to do with Richard Sherman?

Joanimaroni wrote:I'm torn on this one.....

Sherman did not exhibit any class during his on field interview.......he did not have his emotions intact and did not control his frustrations after having been rejected by Crabtree. Hard to do I imagine, when you consider the facts..he just made an incredible play that won his team a Super Bowl spot. Crabtree on the other hand missed the oppurtunity to put his team in the Super Bowl....everything their teams worked for all season came down to a win or lose play.......a play that was literally worth millions.

Having class goes hand in hand with self control. We all get emotionally upset and frustrated....all of us. It is part of life. How we handle our impulses, emotions,  and frustrations sets us apart. Personal development and class......that is the key to being able to exhibit self control.....without it you cannot keep your emotions, mood, and impulses under any  control. We've all seen people that can not control themselves....on a regular basis they lose it....sometimes over nothing at all.


SELF-CONTROL-- Sherman's off field interview was relaxed and controlled....quite different from his on field explosive reaction....a reaction that was loud and not very favorable towards Crabtree. However, he remained focused and expressed his feeling without being bleeped at all. Hot headed--emotional but still very condescending to Crabtree.


In edit....his actions and words were an embarrassment to himself, his teammates and the organization. He needs to work on his personal development.

I don't see the big deal. Sorry.

Apparently this began last summer at a golf tournament in which both players participated.

From Fox Sports:

But why? Where did the bad blood between the two players start? The Seattle Times shed some light on the issue on Sunday night.

Sherman apparently has had it in for Crabtree since the two took part in Larry Fitzgerald's charity golf tournament in Arizona last summer. Sherman went to shake Crabtree's hand and the latter tried to start a fight, according to Sherman's brother Branton.

"I'm going to make a play and embarrass him," Sherman said that day.

Well, he did.

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/laces-out/what-s-the-story-behind-sherman-s-beef-with-crabtree-012014?gt1=39002

Well... that changes my mind some. I still think he should've used more restraint in the moment on live tv...

but taking a jab at the guy doesn't bother me. Maybe on twitter. The rivalries seem tame today to me.

PkrBum wrote:Well... that changes my mind some. I still think he should've used more restraint in the moment on live tv...

but taking a jab at the guy doesn't bother me. Maybe on twitter. The rivalries seem tame today to me.

No love lost with those two teams. The only real perspective is to listen to interviews done after the Bronco/Patriot game.

Sal wrote:What??

An outrageously compensated man trained to react violently and impulsively, and treated by millions as though he were some kind of demigod, behaved outside the lines of proper decorum??

Whoda thunk it?

How is he "outrageously compensated"? According to some news reports, he earns about $555,000.00 a year. Yes, many people admire his talent and abilities. So what? IF you could do what he does, you too would make over half a million a year and be admired by many.

I agree if people suffer from arrested development and want to watch grown men play kids games then whatever the market will bear.

Millionaires in tights playing for their billionaire owners. Yup we got circuses and bread galore..

TEOTWAWKI wrote:I agree if people suffer from arrested development and want to watch grown men play kids games then whatever the market will bear.

Millionaires in tights playing for their billionaire owners. Yup we got circuses and bread galore..

I don't mind the tights.   

Joanimaroni wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:I agree if people suffer from arrested development and want to watch grown men play kids games then whatever the market will bear.

Millionaires in tights playing for their billionaire owners. Yup we got circuses and bread galore..

I don't mind the tights.   

Yes like Kissinger said, power is the ultimate aphrodisiac.

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:I agree if people suffer from arrested development and want to watch grown men play kids games then whatever the market will bear.

Millionaires in tights playing for their billionaire owners. Yup we got circuses and bread galore..

I don't mind the tights.      

Yes like Kissinger said, power is the ultimate aphrodisiac.

He should know. May his karma come tomorrow to haunt him for the rest of his days...and may they be short.

cheers to mlk day. where the idea is too judge by character and not by skin tone.

and thumbs down to idiotic race baiters who only seem to bait their hook one way because he is limited in his exposure to black people.

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:I agree if people suffer from arrested development and want to watch grown men play kids games then whatever the market will bear.

Millionaires in tights playing for their billionaire owners. Yup we got circuses and bread galore..

I don't mind the tights.      

Yes like Kissinger said, power is the ultimate aphrodisiac.

Was that supposed to make some sort of sense? No, no of course not.

Markle wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Joanimaroni wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:I agree if people suffer from arrested development and want to watch grown men play kids games then whatever the market will bear.

Millionaires in tights playing for their billionaire owners. Yup we got circuses and bread galore..

I don't mind the tights.      

Yes like Kissinger said, power is the ultimate aphrodisiac.

Was that supposed to make some sort of sense?  No, no of course not.

Well yes it makes very good sense when you understand English and women. Power is a turn on for women, muscles, money, or courage...guess you never had the pleasure.

Well yes it makes very good sense when you understand English and women. Power is a turn on for women, muscles, money, or courage...guess you never had the pleasure.


Wow.......to think we had Don Juan on our forum.....the sheer power makes the woman on this forum have a very hard time controlling themselves......I guess on MLK's birthday, this post explains why Hoover was taping the man.....his power was a turn on for women........and to think we have someone on this forum who has had this pleasure......I learn something new each day.