HomeThe Cardinal is punching the Ducks straight up in the teeth at this point.
Pensacola Discussion Forum
This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.
Message [Page 1 of 2]
2 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/7/2013, 11:37 pm
Sal
Billybob, or Jimmyjoe, or Rickybobby, or whatever the name of that FSU coach is, he must be happy at this point.
17-0
lol
17-0
lol
3 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 1:07 am
ZVUGKTUBM
26-20, Stanford. Looks like FSU moves up to #2 this week. Maybe Alabama/FSU for the crystal football in January?
4 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 1:55 am
boards of FL
FSU deserved the spot regardless. Had a great night watching this game with a bunch of FSU fans. Early on in the season I was convinced that Oregon could handle - or, at least hang with - Alabama. But after seeing how Oregon struggled with UCLA, hahahahaha.
The PAC12 has no real athletes. FSU is stacked, athletically, just like Alabama. Anyone who watches college football on a regular basis could see that there was nothing that would come out of the PAC12 that passed the eye test after seeing that UCLA game.
I was really interested in watching this game, simply because Alabama plays the exact same scheme as Stanford. In my mind, I thought "Well, this will at least be a good barometer to see how a team like Oregon would fare against a physical scheme like this."
FSU is even with Alabama in terms of athletic talent. It all comes down to scheme, and QB. QB typically wins the day, so I'm going to go ahead and say that FSU will handle Alabama with ease, simply due to an advantage at QB.
And there you have it.
The PAC12 has no real athletes. FSU is stacked, athletically, just like Alabama. Anyone who watches college football on a regular basis could see that there was nothing that would come out of the PAC12 that passed the eye test after seeing that UCLA game.
I was really interested in watching this game, simply because Alabama plays the exact same scheme as Stanford. In my mind, I thought "Well, this will at least be a good barometer to see how a team like Oregon would fare against a physical scheme like this."
FSU is even with Alabama in terms of athletic talent. It all comes down to scheme, and QB. QB typically wins the day, so I'm going to go ahead and say that FSU will handle Alabama with ease, simply due to an advantage at QB.
And there you have it.
_________________
I approve this message.
5 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 1:59 am
Joanimaroni
What the hell happened tonight? It looked like Standford was playing the "Little Sisters of the Poor" the first 3 quarters.
6 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 1:59 am
boards of FL
I'll put it down now and say that FSU will win by 2 possessions or more. And I'm a gator fan. They simply have to much athletic talent, and an NFL ready QB. If this were college basketball, we have a "one-and-done" vs an "accountant", and that "one and done" is surrounded by NFL talent and supported by NFL corners.
_________________
I approve this message.
8 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 2:18 am
boards of FL
Johnny Football put up 42 with nothing but one WR and absolutely no offensive line or any defense. FSU has an arguably better QB, WRs, RBs, NFL ready corners. I don't see any scenario in which Alabama wins that game.
_________________
I approve this message.
9 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 2:19 am
boards of FL
Hell, anyone care to make it "interesting"?
_________________
I approve this message.
10 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 7:52 am
Guest
Guest
No... I agree w you. The great upset would've been oregon winning out. I'm still concerned about the fsu/uf game tho... the big rivalry games can be so unpredictable.boards of FL wrote:Hell, anyone care to make it "interesting"?
11 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 9:20 am
Ghost Rider
FSU was already #2 in the BCS poll. They leaped Oregon in the latest BCS poll that came out last Sunday. It does appear on the surface anyway that it will be Alabama/FSU for the BCS Championship. FSU has a pretty easy schedule the rest of the way except for the ACC Championship game which will probably be Miami again, and we all know how hard it is to beat the same team twice in one season.ZVUGKTUBM wrote:26-20, Stanford. Looks like FSU moves up to #2 this week. Maybe Alabama/FSU for the crystal football in January?
12 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 12:43 pm
ZVUGKTUBM
Picture this scenario.... UF loses to Vandy this weekend, and Will Muschamp is fired on Monday. He continues to coach through the end of the season, like Ron Zook did in 2004. They go to Tallahassee to play FSU at home later this month, and Muschamp pulls-off what Zook managed to do in 2004, beating the 'Noles on their home turf. Stranger things have happened.....PkrBum wrote:No... I agree w you. The great upset would've been oregon winning out. I'm still concerned about the fsu/uf game tho... the big rivalry games can be so unpredictable.boards of FL wrote:Hell, anyone care to make it "interesting"?
It is a long shot, but this is a game I always follow.
13 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 1:10 pm
boards of FL
They play in the Swamp this year. Not tally.
_________________
I approve this message.
15 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 3:42 pm
Ghost Rider
Z-Man, sometimes with some of the posts you post, make me wonder if you even watch follow college football. First you stated that FSU would move to #2 when actually they are already #2, then you say that maybe they will go into Tallahassee and and beat FSU. Well as BOF said, the game is is being played at the Swamp this year.................ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Picture this scenario.... UF loses to Vandy this weekend, and Will Muschamp is fired on Monday. He continues to coach through the end of the season, like Ron Zook did in 2004. They go to Tallahassee to play FSU at home later this month, and Muschamp pulls-off what Zook managed to do in 2004, beating the 'Noles on their home turf. Stranger things have happened.....PkrBum wrote:No... I agree w you. The great upset would've been oregon winning out. I'm still concerned about the fsu/uf game tho... the big rivalry games can be so unpredictable.boards of FL wrote:Hell, anyone care to make it "interesting"?
It is a long shot, but this is a game I always follow.
16 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 3:45 pm
Ghost Rider
Alabama better be concerned with LSU this weekend instead of looking forward to Auburn.2seaoat wrote:Alabama has to get by Auburn.
If Alabama looses to LSU or Auburn and FSU and OSU win out, we could be looking at a FSU/OSU BCS National Title Game.
17 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 3:59 pm
boards of FL
Ghost Rider wrote:... we could be looking at a FSU/OSU BCS National Title Game.
77 - 0
_________________
I approve this message.
18 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 4:02 pm
Guest
Guest
I think michigan state has a legitimate shot at ohio state in the big ten championship game. I'd hate to see baylor get a shot tho. It will be disappointing if fsu/alabama aren't in the big game. I'm glad we'll have a playoff of sorts next year. Bout time.
19 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 4:07 pm
Ghost Rider
Agreed!PkrBum wrote:I think michigan state has a legitimate shot at ohio state in the big ten championship game. I'd hate to see baylor get a shot tho. It will be disappointing if fsu/alabama aren't in the big game. I'm glad we'll have a playoff of sorts next year. Bout time.
20 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 4:52 pm
ZVUGKTUBM
Yeah.... I will eat crow on this one. I love college football, but have only watched one game this year. I end up sitting on the SI.com NCAA Football Scoreboard instead on Saturdays:Ghost Rider wrote:Z-Man, sometimes with some of the posts you post, make me wonder if you even watch follow college football. First you stated that FSU would move to #2 when actually they are already #2, then you say that maybe they will go into Tallahassee and and beat FSU. Well as BOF said, the game is is being played at the Swamp this year.................ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Picture this scenario.... UF loses to Vandy this weekend, and Will Muschamp is fired on Monday. He continues to coach through the end of the season, like Ron Zook did in 2004. They go to Tallahassee to play FSU at home later this month, and Muschamp pulls-off what Zook managed to do in 2004, beating the 'Noles on their home turf. Stranger things have happened.....PkrBum wrote:No... I agree w you. The great upset would've been oregon winning out. I'm still concerned about the fsu/uf game tho... the big rivalry games can be so unpredictable.boards of FL wrote:Hell, anyone care to make it "interesting"?
It is a long shot, but this is a game I always follow.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/ncaa/scoreboards/divia/today/?cnn=yes
You can follow multiple games at once without being planted in front of the TV with this. I can surf the net and follow football all day. I guess this means I am glued to my PC, which is the truth....
21 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 8:14 pm
Ghost Rider
Please don't get your feathers all ruffled, I was just giving you a hard time. I know that you are an avid football fan.ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Yeah.... I will eat crow on this one. I love college football, but have only watched one game this year. I end up sitting on the SI.com NCAA Football Scoreboard instead on Saturdays:Ghost Rider wrote:Z-Man, sometimes with some of the posts you post, make me wonder if you even watch follow college football. First you stated that FSU would move to #2 when actually they are already #2, then you say that maybe they will go into Tallahassee and and beat FSU. Well as BOF said, the game is is being played at the Swamp this year.................ZVUGKTUBM wrote:Picture this scenario.... UF loses to Vandy this weekend, and Will Muschamp is fired on Monday. He continues to coach through the end of the season, like Ron Zook did in 2004. They go to Tallahassee to play FSU at home later this month, and Muschamp pulls-off what Zook managed to do in 2004, beating the 'Noles on their home turf. Stranger things have happened.....PkrBum wrote:No... I agree w you. The great upset would've been oregon winning out. I'm still concerned about the fsu/uf game tho... the big rivalry games can be so unpredictable.boards of FL wrote:Hell, anyone care to make it "interesting"?
It is a long shot, but this is a game I always follow.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/ncaa/scoreboards/divia/today/?cnn=yes
You can follow multiple games at once without being planted in front of the TV with this. I can surf the net and follow football all day. I guess this means I am glued to my PC, which is the truth....
22 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 8:21 pm
Joanimaroni
We need LSU or Auburn to beat Al. FSU will take UF in the swamp.
23 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 8:26 pm
Guest
Guest
I think fsu can take al... that's the championship game I'd like to see. Either team would kill osu or baylor.Joanimaroni wrote:We need LSU or Auburn to beat Al. FSU will take UF in the swamp.
24 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 8:33 pm
Joanimaroni
Our ace is certainly Winston but you can not discredit the FSU defense. I think they can do it.PkrBum wrote:I think fsu can take al... that's the championship game I'd like to see. Either team would kill osu or baylor.Joanimaroni wrote:We need LSU or Auburn to beat Al. FSU will take UF in the swamp.
25 Re: Stanford v Oregon 11/8/2013, 9:33 pm
2seaoat
If the tide beats LSU, and Auburn beats Alabama, I still think they would probably take a one loss Alabama in the title game, even though Auburn beat them.....they sure as hell will not take Auburn because when they were undefeated they were not chosen. A two loss Alabama is the only way I see them out of the Championship game.....hell Northern Illinois is undefeated MAC conference......is a perfect record the only way into the championship game.......I don't think so.
I do not think Michigan State could beat Northern let alone Ohio State.
I do not think Michigan State could beat Northern let alone Ohio State.
Message [Page 1 of 2]
Go to page : 1, 2
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum