ANOTHER SCANDAL...this is another one at the Hillary Clinton run State Department

2seaoat wrote:Pretty sad that you still think that way.

I just summed up the thoughts of the crazies.....made you a bit uncomfortable......

2seaoat wrote:No because you spoke for yourself and your kind.

You mean folks who recognize that most of the hatred toward the President is based on his racial characteristics...........yep, if my kind think that way.....I guess you are correct again.

I would agree that most of the "hatred" for Obama is because of his race. But, that would be a very small percentage. Now lets talk about how many despise him because of his unacceptable political agendas. We might really have something to talk about then. Otherwise its just more dumbass race baiting. Which you seem to get some sort thrill from. Whatever. Carry on.

2seaoat wrote:No because you spoke for yourself and your kind.

You mean folks who recognize that most of the hatred toward the President is based on his racial characteristics...........yep, if my kind think that way.....I guess you are correct again.

knothead wrote:From Markle to Us:


You mean folks who recognize that most of the hatred toward the President is based on his racial characteristics...........yep, if my kind think that way.....I guess you are correct again.


****************************************************************


BINGO!!

Floridatexan wrote:
All you have to do is hit your keyboard, Markle, and you're lying again.  I can't believe you cling to a failed ideology that promotes inequality, social division, treating women like chattel, and cranking up the war machine for profit.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:
All you have to do is hit your keyboard, Markle, and you're lying again.  I can't believe you cling to a failed ideology that promotes inequality, social division, treating women like chattel, and cranking up the war machine for profit.

That about describes Markle's way of thinking.........

2seaoat wrote:Pretty sad that you still think that way.

I just summed up the thoughts of the crazies.....made you a bit uncomfortable......

Floridatexan wrote:
All you have to do is hit your keyboard, Markle, and you're lying again.  I can't believe you cling to a failed ideology that promotes inequality, social division, treating women like chattel, and cranking up the war machine for profit.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

Floridatexan wrote:
All you have to do is hit your keyboard, Markle, and you're lying again.  I can't believe you cling to a failed ideology that promotes inequality, social division, treating women like chattel, and cranking up the war machine for profit.

That about describes Markle's way of thinking.........

2seaoat wrote:Seagoat wouldn't know racism if it sat him in the back of the bus.

Yep.....that racism thing on the PNJ is an illusion......the DOJ citing the jail because they still segregate inmates by race.......nope.....the only thing true about this thread is that it is all about fear and prejudice.........and the sad thing is.......in 2043 my family will be a minority family.........this is a great country which has overcome prejudice to elect a black president......but for the hardcore racist......the special interests have fanned the hatred to their advantage.....so a shill telling me that racism is simply a card to be played......segregated jails and proms in 2013......tell me about how much some people have changed.

2seaoat wrote:We have also never had a more divisive President in modern history.


We agree on that issue.....the racial hatred has a built in predisposition that everything about this president is bad.......an absurd proposition, and with that prejudice America has continued to lose.   The core problem in America is racism.   It divides folks with common economic and political interests, and it is most certainly been utilized by those who want to continue their special privileges and legislation.......so a logjam to bring this country to its collective knees serves their purposes.....and the vehicle is regional raw racism.......My wife has a former student who is teaching and is 39 years of age who posted that the first lady looks like a monkey......this person is teaching kids.....he is posting this bitter racism on facebook in plain view of any student, board member, or community member........and it does not even dawn on him that his words are hate filled as the internet chatter and attacks on our President is filled with racist drivel.......sorry.....been there.....done that......and it is what it is.........divisive is hardly under his control......his race drives the same.

Bob wrote:

nochain wrote:Billary has a lot of baggage but the Repubs don't seem to have an opponent lined up for a run right now. Her many questionable issues will be swept under the rug by the MSM as usual. Of course she is more qualified than Oblamer could ever hope to be and it wouldn't hurt to have Wild Bill as her wing man. Maybe he could be an Ambassador to Congress and coordinate some bi-partisan solutions to the many Oblamer disasters that have occurred.

What makes her so qualified?  

But you're right about the republicans.  The best republican candidate would be Chris Christie but now the republicans despise him because he used obama to get relief for the hurricane victims so he can never get the nomination.  And he couldn't win anyway as long as he stays a fat slob.



Although I've sworn off ever voting for another democrat or republican again.  I could vote for Christie if he separated from those assholes but not otherwise.

Christie would be a good choice and he had his stomach stapled a few months ago. He seems have much more common sense than most of the the republicans they might be throwing out.

doubtingthomas wrote:

Bob wrote:

nochain wrote:Billary has a lot of baggage but the Repubs don't seem to have an opponent lined up for a run right now. Her many questionable issues will be swept under the rug by the MSM as usual. Of course she is more qualified than Oblamer could ever hope to be and it wouldn't hurt to have Wild Bill as her wing man. Maybe he could be an Ambassador to Congress and coordinate some bi-partisan solutions to the many Oblamer disasters that have occurred.

What makes her so qualified?  

But you're right about the republicans.  The best republican candidate would be Chris Christie but now the republicans despise him because he used obama to get relief for the hurricane victims so he can never get the nomination.  And he couldn't win anyway as long as he stays a fat slob.



Although I've sworn off ever voting for another democrat or republican again.  I could vote for Christie if he separated from those assholes but not otherwise.

Christie would be a good choice and he had his stomach stapled a few months ago. He seems have much more common sense than most of the the republicans they might be throwing out.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

doubtingthomas wrote:

Bob wrote:

nochain wrote:Billary has a lot of baggage but the Repubs don't seem to have an opponent lined up for a run right now. Her many questionable issues will be swept under the rug by the MSM as usual. Of course she is more qualified than Oblamer could ever hope to be and it wouldn't hurt to have Wild Bill as her wing man. Maybe he could be an Ambassador to Congress and coordinate some bi-partisan solutions to the many Oblamer disasters that have occurred.

What makes her so qualified?  

But you're right about the republicans.  The best republican candidate would be Chris Christie but now the republicans despise him because he used obama to get relief for the hurricane victims so he can never get the nomination.  And he couldn't win anyway as long as he stays a fat slob.



Although I've sworn off ever voting for another democrat or republican again.  I could vote for Christie if he separated from those assholes but not otherwise.

Christie would be a good choice and he had his stomach stapled a few months ago. He seems have much more common sense than most of the the republicans they might be throwing out.

I have made fun of Bobby Jindal on this forum, as he was his parents anchor-baby. However, I have listened to a few of his speeches, and he comes off as a common-sense politician. Not a neocon, for sure. I could get interested in him if he got serious about a run. But the true Republican crazies? No way. Michelle Bachman is leaving congress and considering a run in 2016. The nuts can gravitate toward her.

PkrBum wrote:

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

doubtingthomas wrote:

Bob wrote:

nochain wrote:Billary has a lot of baggage but the Repubs don't seem to have an opponent lined up for a run right now. Her many questionable issues will be swept under the rug by the MSM as usual. Of course she is more qualified than Oblamer could ever hope to be and it wouldn't hurt to have Wild Bill as her wing man. Maybe he could be an Ambassador to Congress and coordinate some bi-partisan solutions to the many Oblamer disasters that have occurred.

What makes her so qualified?  

But you're right about the republicans.  The best republican candidate would be Chris Christie but now the republicans despise him because he used obama to get relief for the hurricane victims so he can never get the nomination.  And he couldn't win anyway as long as he stays a fat slob.



Although I've sworn off ever voting for another democrat or republican again.  I could vote for Christie if he separated from those assholes but not otherwise.

Christie would be a good choice and he had his stomach stapled a few months ago. He seems have much more common sense than most of the the republicans they might be throwing out.

I have made fun of Bobby Jindal on this forum, as he was his parents anchor-baby. However, I have listened to a few of his speeches, and he comes off as a common-sense politician. Not a neocon, for sure. I could get interested in him if he got serious about a run. But the true Republican crazies? No way. Michelle Bachman is leaving congress and considering a run in 2016. The nuts can gravitate toward her.

Agreed... But after obama I don't give much hope that any politician will do as they say. Can you imagine a more complete reversal?


No one has to imagine anything...we all saw it first-hand with Bush.  Where the hell were you?

2seaoat wrote:I vehemently disagree with you. President Barack Hussein Obama HAD the chance to bring this country together in historic ways. His decision was to do just the opposite.


You really cannot believe that drivel.  Historians will chastise him for trying to please everybody and compromise on everything.   It took him three years to realize the cards were stacked against him and America.   Fortunately, Americans knew the truth.....they waited for hours to vote....they did......and they put this man back into office because Americans understand were the obstruction is coming from.....heck a certain Senator announced the same......special interests cannot stand a President who may actually be working for middle class folks...........