Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

How Capitalism is Dismembering America

2 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


http://www.nationofchange.org/how-capitalism-dismembering-america-1366639514

"...Globalization has allowed U.S. corporations to stop paying for national defense and infrastructure and all the benefits of the U.S. legal and educational systems. All of the following companies had sizable U.S. revenues, but they claimed losses here while declaring billions of dollars of profits overseas.

Bank of America, with 82 percent of its revenue in the U.S., declared $7 billion in U.S. losses and $10 billion in foreign profits.
Citigroup, with 42 percent of its revenue in North America (almost all U.S.), declared a $5 billion U.S. loss and a $28 billion foreign profit.
Pfizer, with 40 percent of its revenues in the U.S., declared almost $7 billion in U.S. losses to go along with $31 billion in foreign profits.
Abbott Labs, with 42 percent of its sales in the U.S., declared a $256 million U.S. loss and $12 billion in foreign profits.
Dow Chemical, with 32 percent of its sales in the U.S., declared a $15 million U.S. loss against foreign profits of over $5 billion.
Conclusions

If there's anyway capitalism will work it has to be regulated. Otherwise greed takes over. Blind greed. The sneering head at the top of the body watches limbs being chopped off, but it doesn't seem to recognize that we're all bleeding to death..."

------------------------------

Comment by Gary Reber:

At the core of understanding America’s economic disintegration and seemingly intractable economic problems is the need to learn a new way of thinking that explains why the operation of our modern industrial economy is simply not working. Although tectonic shifts and advances in the technologies of production promise the increasing abundance of exponential growth in the economy's capacity to produce products and services with much less human effort, there is widespread poverty and a disintegration of middle class status. Even when the economy has experienced some degree of growth, too many people remain poor or are excluded from the resulting limited economic abundance. The notion that the economic benefits flowing to a wealthy class will "trickle-down" is a non-sensible theory and only results in "trickle" menial, low-pay jobs, private charity, and public taxpayer-supported welfare, in plain view and disguised.

What has and continues to escape the focus of conventional economists, and the politics of progressives, centralists and conservatives, is that the wealthy are rich because they own productive capital––non-human wealth-creating assets used to produce products and services. The reality is that in most economic tasks and in the overall economy, productive capital (not human labor) is independently doing evermore of the work that results in wealth-creating assets. It is productive capital's increasing productiveness and evolution, rather than human effort (productivity) that is the productive means most responsible for economic growth. Effectively, technological innovation and invention limits new higher productivity jobs to relatively fewer workers, leaving most other people willing and able to work with lower paying job opportunities or no jobs at all.

It is essential that people focus their thinking on the understanding of who and what creates wealth, in order to fully understand how to solve growing income inequality and the disintegration of the nation wherein the majority of citizens are regulated to low-pay job serfdom and public welfare.

The required new thinking must respect property rights, and the right of all citizens to acquire private and individual ownership of wealth-creating productive capital assets. This is the path to prosperity, opportunity, and economic justice––the ONLY path that will assure democratic and free market conditions.

The reality is that while increasingly productive capital growth is the means to achieving general affluence for all citizens, the practical opportunity to acquire productive capital is not accessible to everyone. The vast majority of citizens are unnecessarily excluded from effective participation in the property rights and earnings of productive capital wealth-creating assets. This is not to say that the opportunity to acquire productive capital does not exist, but that the opportunity is unnecessarily denied to the middle class and poor (the savings-poor capital-less and under-capitalized) and effectively limited to the few who are already well-capitalized and thereby wealthy. Even though the wealthy ownership class represents less than 10 percent of the population with the very rich representing 1 percent or less of the population, they all use the potent financial mechanism of capital credit to acquire productive capital assets, with virtually all assets acquired using the earnings of the productive capital to pay for their acquisition. Through this financial mechanism the rich effectively acquire more riches.

In the meantime, while the economy's technical prowess is capable of producing the products and services needed and wanted by ALL people, the poor and middle class are unable to realize their needs and wants no matter how hard they work, because they cannot earn enough through a job to consume what the economy can produce.

While ALL citizens have the right to earn an income through participating in production, ONLY a few are privileged to effectively participate in production beyond their own labor to include their productive capital wealth-creating assets.

When the right to participate in production through productive capital ownership is effectively denied, especially when tectonic shifts in the technologies of production destroy and degrade the worth of jobs, then the people affected become increasingly insecure in satisfying their and their family's basic survival. Such conditions force them to seek low-pay, low-security jobs, or either charity or welfare, or desperately engage in illegitimate means. Such disintegration tears at society's sense of fairness and justice.

The solution should be obvious––that is to eliminate what amounts to an effective monopoly on productive capital acquisition. This will unleash the economy's full potential to harness and employ productive capital to create wealth-producing assets broadly owned by ALL Americans, while respecting the full property rights of all and without taking anything from the wealthy who now own America. The effect would be to democratize both political power and economic power.

The solution is to employ capital credit mechanisms to facilitate the productive capital acquisition by EVERY citizen, whether poor or in the middle class. This can be facilitated on the basis of self-finance, whereby the productive capital assets, after returning its acquisition costs, begin to pay a fully-distributed capital earnings dividend to its new owners, thus initially supplementing their labor income and reducing their taxpayer-supported welfare dependence, and over time building income to replace their dependency on job earnings and secure their retirement as they age.

Significantly, by facilitating the acquisition of FUTURE productive capital wealth-creating assets by ALL Americans, everyone will increasingly be able to afford to purchase with their productive capital earnings (dividend income) what is increasingly produced by productive capital. This in turn will create the market conditions for sustainable economic growth, and as private, individual ownership spreads, the larger the economy will grow as people's incomes increasingly grow and they purchase more products and services to satisfy their needs and wants. Thus, the effect created would be a self-propelling economic engine of growth capable of producing general affluence for every American, and not limited to those few who now OWN America’s productive power and whose consumption needs are satisfactorily, if not overly met.

To reform the system and make universal productive capital ownership America's future reality requires limited government action. Traditionally, government programs for investment have produced jobs, but relatively few capitalist owners. Until the structural defects of the system are reformed to achieve effective individual ownership of FUTURE productive capital for ALL, the system will continue to perpetually benefit the well-capitalized wealthy, while everyone else is regulated to scarcer jobs and welfare dependency. The action that is required is to eliminate the financial mechanism barriers that effectively concentrate the ownership of productive capital wealth-creating assets, and establish an infrastructure necessary to protect the productive capital acquisition rights of ALL citizens.

Furthermore, ALL government incentives supported by taxpayer dollars and debt, to stimulate the economy with the object of providing more growth and jobs, need to have the stipulation that the corporations receiving the financial benefit demonstrate the creation of new owners, both employees and non-employees. Today, such stimulus does not effectively create new productive capital owners but benefits those who already OWN, in the name of job creation. But the jobs and corresponding wages, which actually result, are often short-lived and always insufficient to effectively assure financial security. The proposition that taxpayer dollars and debt stimulus be used to create new owners in FUTURE productive capital creation, acquired by using the earnings of productive capital, will enable people to harness for themselves the productive power of capital wealth-creating assets to pay for its own acquisition and restoration and thereafter to earn income indefinitely.

The wealthy ownership class understands and employs the strategy of investing in opportunities expected to pay for themselves in a reasonable period of time, typically 5 to 7 years, perhaps 10 in some circumstances. This is the fundamental logic of corporate finance couched in "return on investment" terms. This same logic is the personal investment strategy steadfastly followed by successful capitalized and under-capitalized investors. The rich further understand that once the acquisition cost is paid for out of the FUTURE earnings of the productive capital investment, the asset then continues to earn income indefinitely, or in perpetuity. This is precisely the process used by the rich to get richer.

Thus, rather than preach austerity and redistribution, we should seek prosperity through economic growth financed through capital credit and paid for out of the earnings of productive capital while simultaneously creating new capital owners. This new earnings source will enable ALL Americans to earn sufficient income to live well, and not rely solely on a job. This will also strengthen individualism and respect for equal rights and empower individuals to more fully realize their inherent potentials.

The end result will be to forge a true free market economy in which EVERY American privately and individually participates in the increasing utilization of productive capital to create wealth, and in turn uses this viable dividend income source to satisfy their consumer needs and wants. Collectively, this will fuel massive, sustainable economic growth.

This new paradigm is the subject of the Agenda of The Just Third Way Movement at http://foreconomicjustice.org/?p=5797 and is founded on the concept of Monetary Justice (http://capitalhomestead.org/page/monetary-justice).

A Petition to reform the Federal Reserve to provide capital credit to ALL Americans can be supported at http://signon.org/sign/amend-the-federal-reserve.fb27?source=c.fb&r_by=3.... The proposed Capital Homestead Act (http://www.cesj.org/homestead/index.htm and http://www.cesj.org/homestead/summary-cha.htm) would accomplish the necessary reforms.

Markle

Markle

Capitalism worked in growing the greatest country in the world since 1622. FOUR HUNRED YEARS.

It has worked well so far beyond the expectations of our founders that even they would be awestruck.

It worked so well until Progressives began to deconstruct the very foundation of our economy, country and to now are emulating the failed systems of Europe.

The First Thanksgiving: Reclaiming Jamestown From the Dustbin of History
Daniel Honan on November 23, 2011, 3:00 PM
http://bigthink.com/ideas/41186?page=all


Thanksgiving: The Story of America’s Experiment with Communism and Capitalism

By Kayleigh McEnany:
November 22, 2011 8:53 AM EST

We were all taught about the Pilgrims and Indians, but most of us do not know the real story of Thanksgiving -- the failure of communism and the triumph of capitalism.

Long before Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto, and the days of Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky, the Pilgrims conducted a communist experiment that exposed the system's downfalls and led them to communism's natural antithesis and the economic system we extol today -- capitalism. The incomplete narrative we were told growing up went something like this:

In 1620, the Pilgrims boarded the Mayflower and set sail for the New World. According to their leader, Plymouth Governor William Bradford, they found "cold barren desolate wilderness" upon their arrival in November. The Pilgrims endured a long, cold, and deadly winter during which half of them perished. When spring arrived, the Indians taught the

Pilgrims how to cultivate the land, thereby saving the new settlers.
More often than not, this is where the account ends. But this is not the whole story of Thanksgiving -- far from it. This was just the beginning.

Even though the Indians did, indeed, teach the Pilgrims to farm, fish, and hunt in the spring of 1621, the Pilgrims did not yet prosper. It would be three long years before the Pilgrims could thank God for their plenty. The

Pilgrims had the instructional manual right in front of them. They knew what to do, but could not do it. Why did it take them years to turn theory into practice? What was the impediment to their success? In hindsight, the answer is clear.

As Paul Harvey would say, and now the rest of the story:

After encountering losses in Jamestown, investors were loath to fund voyages to the New World. Any subsidized expedition would be accompanied by strict and unfavorable stipulations. For the Pilgrims, the condition was that all the wealth that they accrued would be "common wealth."

At the end of seven years, the colonists were to split all of their wealth equally with their investors in London. There would be no private property, since this might incentivize the colonists to toil harder on their own land rather than the common land. So, from 1620 to 1622, Plymouth was essentially a commune with all land and profits owned by the community as a whole.

The result of this communal style of living was disastrous. Death, starvation and disease ensued. The Pilgrims were "languish[ing] in mystery" in the words of Bradford. Although Plymouth was filled with "godly and sober men," he said the community fell victim to sloth, laziness, and the refusal to work.

Why? For the same reason communism never works; it's the free-rider effect. The few who break their backs working watch the fruits of their labor go to the lazy or the free-riders who latch onto their coattails without doing any of the work themselves.

Bradford found a solution to the Pilgrims' woes:
"At length, after much debate of things, the Governor... gave way that they should set corn every man for his own particular, and in that regard trust to themselves... And so assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number." In short, property was privatized, and the colonists experienced "very good success."

Bradford acknowledged the folly of their previous ways: "The experience that we had in this common course and condition tried sundry years... that by taking away property, and bringing community into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing -- as if they were wiser than God."

Realizing that communism was not the answer, that each man can only appreciate the things he earns, the Pilgrims continued to privatize more and more over the years. In doing so, they wrote not just the story of Thanksgiving, but also the story of America.

http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/254025/20111122/thanksgiving-capitalism-communism-pilgrims-america.htm

Another source about Jamestown
http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/private-property-saved-jamestown-it-america

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum