As we popular women of the night do: I was sitting here listening to O'Reilly tonight (caught me!).
The topic was legalization of pot.
It was like listening to Reefer Madness and I was ashamed for the guy.
In 1969----------Yes! That long ago. I had a prof who taught Eng. 101 while his Dad headed the Law Dept of Penn State. We all thought it beyond ironic when his son wrote a Penn State Newspaper article with all the stats comparing smoking vs. drinking............apparently the Admin did not.
As it happened, I was in both their classes which only simmered the "pot"...sorry.
Anyway, as I remember it, pot smoking had an entirely different stat than drinking and their ROI was significant.
Whatever, O'Reilly sounded like an ardvark (no, I love, ardvarks) but he was not with it and totally out of sync.
Then again: like Chrissy pointed out in another thread, it can be easily be what the media "encourages" us to believe.
Perhaps my younger Daughter is correct in labeling herself as a social liberal, but fiscal conservative?
Or.........Libertarian
The topic was legalization of pot.
It was like listening to Reefer Madness and I was ashamed for the guy.
In 1969----------Yes! That long ago. I had a prof who taught Eng. 101 while his Dad headed the Law Dept of Penn State. We all thought it beyond ironic when his son wrote a Penn State Newspaper article with all the stats comparing smoking vs. drinking............apparently the Admin did not.
As it happened, I was in both their classes which only simmered the "pot"...sorry.
Anyway, as I remember it, pot smoking had an entirely different stat than drinking and their ROI was significant.
Whatever, O'Reilly sounded like an ardvark (no, I love, ardvarks) but he was not with it and totally out of sync.
Then again: like Chrissy pointed out in another thread, it can be easily be what the media "encourages" us to believe.
Perhaps my younger Daughter is correct in labeling herself as a social liberal, but fiscal conservative?
Or.........Libertarian