I still suspect the active involvement of elements within the CIA.
Look, our Libyan operations definitely involved the CIA prior to the fall of Khadaffi and certainly after the fall. The ambassador and his team made real progress prior to the fall of the regime and they were making real progress after the fall of the government. They were doing this regime change the good old way things were done before the Church commission.....with active CIA involvement. However, it makes no sense for the CIA to kill the Ambassador. No sense at all. CIA has a bigger footprint with David Petraeous actively conducting operations in Syria and Iran, and he will advance American national interests without spending trillions and thousands of lives.
So in this new war format, we lost four of our patriots, but do not mistake this was not a traditional embassy operation, but an active CIA recruitment and it was very successful. If you want to find the conspiracy, you only need to identify those who do not want Petraeous to be successful in his new role.......and there are three main suspects. Al Queda who wants the West to overreact and spend trillions and therefore become weaker, the military industrial complex who will slowly be chocked of profits as we wind down our military to a smaller and changing paradigm, and the state of Israel which needs us to fight a war with Iran while they stand on the sidelines because the standard rationalization is that if they join in we will lose our Arab alliance. All three of these interests groups would love to see our CIA operations fail, and would have every reason to target the Ambassador who was winning the Libyan people over.....your theory on the CIA being involved in the killing of the Ambassador is counter intuitive as the CIA is going to grow and career CIA are flourishing in the new paradigm.
Home
