Is Barack Hussein Obama II responsible for anything?

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Carter accepted responsibility for Desert One in 1979, Reagan did the same in Beirut in 1983, but the HUSSEIN is never responsible for anything..he thinks. Voters can hold him responsible on November 6th.

nochain wrote:BHO skates out again as Hillary throws herself under the bus for him over Libya. Yes, she is responsible for the failures of the State Dept but so is he as her boss. Unless of course her boss is BHO! Then he gets another free pass. The killing of an Ambassador and others, the murder of a border agent with Fast and Furious guns, his failure to deliver on his many promises, his waffling and reversal on gay marriage, his refusal to reign in his lying Vice Pres (no it’s easier to call out the post debate fire brigade and wash off all the BS Biden spewed out), his continued support for a lying Attorney General, his despicable treatment of the Doctor who gave up OBL, and lets not forget the ultimate lie and failure – “If I don’t have this done in three years, then there’s going to be a one-term proposition.” Well sport it’s not done and yet you are running again so that was just another lie and failure to accept responsibility. But he got rid of his responsibility by saying they underestimated the challenges. That makes as much sense as his poor debate performance being due to higher altitude.

PkrBum wrote:obama is the "not me" president. but it's not necessarily him i put blame on... he simply is what he is.

i put the blame on the people that voted for a candidate that we knew next to nothing about... why would people do that?

PkrBum wrote:obama is the "not me" president. but it's not necessarily him i put blame on... he simply is what he is.

i put the blame on the people that voted for a candidate that we knew next to nothing about... why would people do that?

nochain wrote:Who is responsible for what in Libya?
By Jennifer Rubin
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton took “responsibility” for the Benghazi attacks. In one sense, she is right, of course. Four of her people were killed. Her department denied them additional security. But to what extent is she responsible for:

The failure to recognize that Libya had become a dangerous hotbed of jihadists? Certainly the intelligence community, the national security adviser and the president himself should have recognized the deteriorating situation, especially when the International Red Cross pulled up stakes. Yet they continued to turn a blind eye toward the descent into chaos.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/who-is-responsible-for-what-in-libya/2012/10/16/ca508cea-179a-11e2-9855-71f2b202721b_blog.html


And Susan Rice attempts to deflect responsibility:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-ambassador-susan-rice/2012/10/15/c5a9fe04-16d9-11e2-8792-cf5305eddf60_story.html?hpid=z1

othershoe1030 wrote:It truly amazes me that there was this much of a disconnect between early reports and what really happened. I can't imagine why anyone at any level of the administration would even entertain the notion that they could cover up or get away with anything.

Between reporters on the ground, cell phones and twitter everything is pretty much out in the open for all to see. I think it was a CNN reporter who did some good investigative reporting within hours of the event and reported no street demonstrations or riots. And given the types of weapons the attackers were using, well, this was no spontaneous mob action.

Rice must have either been off the reservation with this one or someone fed her the wrong information. This is beyond me. They sure didn't need to have a "cover-up" type story this close to the election. Bad decisions all around.

othershoe1030 wrote:It truly amazes me that there was this much of a disconnect between early reports and what really happened. I can't imagine why anyone at any level of the administration would even entertain the notion that they could cover up or get away with anything.

Between reporters on the ground, cell phones and twitter everything is pretty much out in the open for all to see. I think it was a CNN reporter who did some good investigative reporting within hours of the event and reported no street demonstrations or riots. And given the types of weapons the attackers were using, well, this was no spontaneous mob action.

Rice must have either been off the reservation with this one or someone fed her the wrong information. This is beyond me. They sure didn't need to have a "cover-up" type story this close to the election. Bad decisions all around.

salinsky wrote:

othershoe1030 wrote:Id.

It should be remembered that the attack on the Benghazi consulate happened in the same time frame as the embassy riots in Egypt that were in fact prompted by the video. Benghazi is pretty remote and the details surrounding the attack were initially sketchy, so it's no surprise that the first response speculated that there was a connection.

Slicef18 wrote:From what I read here and on other sites, Barack Hussein Obama is responsible for all maladies great and small, spiritual and secular, from the beginning of time. He's even responsible for Bush's ineptness and Cheney's Black soul.

Slicef18 wrote:From what I read here and on other sites, Barack Hussein Obama is responsible for all maladies great and small, spiritual and secular, from the beginning of time. He's even responsible for Bush's ineptness and Cheney's Black soul.

PkrBum wrote:

Slicef18 wrote:From what I read here and on other sites, Barack Hussein Obama is responsible for all maladies great and small, spiritual and secular, from the beginning of time. He's even responsible for Bush's ineptness and Cheney's Black soul.

there was a video out the next morning (while that stooge carney was sent out to blame it on a youtube) that clearly showed heavily armed terrorists moving though the perimeter... we had a thread right here laughing at the blatant lies.

obama even tried to use that story at the UN... and made an infomercial to lie over there ... slice... you can't be dense enough to dismiss this.

if you want to give credit for bin laden... it comes with a side of reality.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:PeeDog, why are you trying to clog the forum up with old threads? Don't complain about getting minuses for doing crap like that.