Home
http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/U-S-2016-Unadjusted-Exit-by-Ron-Baiman-2016-Elections_Exit-Polls-161208-153.html
[...]
"4) Conclusion
It is nearly impossible to think of a plausible statistical, or innocent exit poll error, rationale for the one-sided "red shift" (and anti-Sanders shift) UEP discrepancy patterns, with the most highly significant discrepancies occurring in key battle ground and deep-red states, in recent U.S. elections. These repeated patterns of exit poll discrepancies with official vote counts are in practice, statistically impossible, but highly politically consistent. Given what we know about how U.S. elections are conducted, a reasonable conclusion is that these in all likelihood reflect differences in how votes are counted, not counted, or miscounted by partisan and largely unmonitored and unregulated election officials. As Greg Palast has pointed out, this does not even have to include broad based hacking or rigged machine miscounting (though incidents of this have been found in states with large exit poll discrepancies in earlier elections) but simply the process of discarding and not counting numerous spoiled, provisional, early, mail-in, and absentee ballots, based on illegal partisan voter registration stripping and partisan and repressive local election vote counting rules and procedures. Consider, for example, the U.S. Civil Rights Commission's finding that in Florida in 2000 (disproportionately Democratic) black voters were more than 10 times more likely than (disproportionately Republican) non-black voters to have their ballots rejected.
Time stamped screen shots of UEPs broadcast on CNN, and generously provided by Theodore de Macedo Soares, are available upon request. These conform to the UEP data, generously provided by Jonathan Simon, used in this analysis."
***********
Boards, please take the time to read the whole entry.
[...]
"4) Conclusion
It is nearly impossible to think of a plausible statistical, or innocent exit poll error, rationale for the one-sided "red shift" (and anti-Sanders shift) UEP discrepancy patterns, with the most highly significant discrepancies occurring in key battle ground and deep-red states, in recent U.S. elections. These repeated patterns of exit poll discrepancies with official vote counts are in practice, statistically impossible, but highly politically consistent. Given what we know about how U.S. elections are conducted, a reasonable conclusion is that these in all likelihood reflect differences in how votes are counted, not counted, or miscounted by partisan and largely unmonitored and unregulated election officials. As Greg Palast has pointed out, this does not even have to include broad based hacking or rigged machine miscounting (though incidents of this have been found in states with large exit poll discrepancies in earlier elections) but simply the process of discarding and not counting numerous spoiled, provisional, early, mail-in, and absentee ballots, based on illegal partisan voter registration stripping and partisan and repressive local election vote counting rules and procedures. Consider, for example, the U.S. Civil Rights Commission's finding that in Florida in 2000 (disproportionately Democratic) black voters were more than 10 times more likely than (disproportionately Republican) non-black voters to have their ballots rejected.
Time stamped screen shots of UEPs broadcast on CNN, and generously provided by Theodore de Macedo Soares, are available upon request. These conform to the UEP data, generously provided by Jonathan Simon, used in this analysis."
***********
Boards, please take the time to read the whole entry.