Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants . . The TRUTH about the Clinton Slush Fund

4 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Markle

Markle

The TRUTH about the infamouse Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Foundation.

Just 5.7 Percent Of Clinton Foundation Budget Actually Went To Charitable Grants


Photo of Peter Hasson
PETER HASSON
Reporter, Associate Editor
6:36 PM 09/16/2016

Just 5.7 percent of the Clinton Foundation’s massive 2014 budget actually went to charitable grants, according to the tax-exempt organization’s IRS filings. The rest went to salaries and employee benefits, fundraising and “other expenses.”

The Clinton Foundation spent a hair under $91.3 million in 2014, the organization’s IRS filings show. But less than $5.2 million of that went to charitable grants.

That number pales in comparison to the $34.8 million the foundation spent on salaries, compensation, and employee benefits.

Another $50.4 million was marked as “other expenses,” while the remaining almost $851K was marked as “professional fundraising expenses.”


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/16/just-5-7-percent-of-clinton-foundation-budget-actually-went-to-charity/#ixzz4KT8mjG96

Knowledgeable people already knew these FACTS, the blind Clinton lemmings continue with their heads in the sand. Total blind alegience. No surprise.

Markle

Markle

No surprise, once again the far left Progressives vividly demonstrate that the Clinton's can lie, cheat, steal, extort, rape and worse and their supporters simply pretend it doesn't happen.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


You're the liar, and no one here is fooled by the disgusting crap you try to foist on the people here each and every day. Good luck in the hereafter; you're going to need it.

Markle

Markle

Nothing from the Progressives who know, darn good and well, that the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Foundation is nothing but a slush fund for their personal use funded by countries who rape children and throw homosexuals off roofs.

Then she talks about helping women and children.

Sal

Sal

You're lying in such a transparently obvious fashion that it does not require any response.

Good job, dumbass.

Markle

Markle

Sal wrote:You're lying in such a transparently obvious fashion that it does not require any response.

Good job, dumbass.

The truth and facts frighten you...don't they? They do all Progressives!

2seaoat



Again, another lying thread. I gave you the stats on the Clinton Foundation and where the money went after you posted this obvious lie where you think that the only way a charity works is to give to other charities........you lied on the crime stats after I pointed out your deception........you really are lower than Trump......you get paid to be a sociopath.

Markle

Markle

Clintons Pushed Most Wasteful of U.S.-Funded Haiti Projects

JULY 02, 2016

Roughly half of the $1.14 billion that the U.S. government allocated to help Haiti recover from the 2010 earthquake has gone to wasteful projects with the single largest chunk—$170.3 million—going to a failed port and power plant adventure heavily promoted by Bill Clinton and the State Department under the leadership if his beloved wife.

Can you say scandal? The former president, who has been heavily involved in distributing Haiti earthquake reconstruction funds, pushed hard for the power plant and port for an industrial park in northern Haiti billed as the centerpiece of the United States’ effort to help the ravaged island nation rebuild. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton joined her husband in the effort, making several trips to Haiti to promote the project and encourage foreigners to invest in it.

[...]

http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2013/07/clintons-pushed-most-wasteful-of-u-s-funded-haiti-projects/

Markle

Markle

All my Progressive good friends are fully aware that this source is one of the most Progressive on the Internet. They BILL themselves as being Progressive.

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News 8/23/2016 at 14:43:30
Recently Leaked Documents Confirm Clinton Haitian Gold Scheme
By Georgianne Nienaber

The Clinton exploitation of Haiti will eventually go up in flames, and when the smoke settles an emotional and fiscal disaster of enormous proportions will finally be visible to the world. It will be difficult to sift through the ashes to find truth, but the truth is there. Follow the money, follow the pandering, follow the emails, and follow the favors traded for gold.


Another email linked to Hillary Clinton's pay-for play scandal involving State Department favors for the Clinton Foundation has surfaced, but it is not one of Clinton's famously deleted emails. A confidential email to possible capital investors for a $26.5M fully operational open-pit gold processing facility in Haiti says it all.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Recently-Leaked-Documents-by-Georgianne-Nienabe-Clinton-Bill_Clinton-Cash_Clinton-Foundation_Donors-160823-957.html

2seaoat



Gobbels made it seem logical to kill jews.....you post your propaganda here where thousands of lives have been saved by the Clinton Foundation, and you attempt to make this a bad thing.......you sir are a fascist. an evil human being who Boards correctly identified, and I tried to defend you as periodically posting relevant posts which were truthful.......you post innuendo with no facts and you attempt to cause harm for those stupid enough to waste time with you. The Clinton Foundation has never bought an AG, and where is your outrage where the Trump foundation has broken the law....not innuendo.....but really broke the law. How about telling us about the good things that the Trump foundation has done.

Markle

Markle

My Progressive friends here simply refuse to face facts. Go figure! Guess their feelings are hurt by all the news about their corrupt leader.

WSJ: Clinton Foundation lobbied State on visa for Haitian PM — while exec stayed at his house
POSTED AT 2:01 PM ON SEPTEMBER 19, 2016 BY ED MORRISSEY


Don’t call it corruption. Call it … a confluence of interests. In other words, whatever interested the Clintons became what interested the State Department. A new series of e-mails emerging from FOIA lawsuits and reported by the Wall Street Journal show how Clinton Foundation interests took precedence over matters of state during Hillary Clinton’s tenure:

On Jan. 27, 2011, Clinton Foundation Chief Operating Officer Laura Graham sent an email to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff Cheryl Mills, voicing concern about a rumor. Ms. Graham had heard that Foggy Bottom was thinking about revoking the U.S. visa of Haitian Prime Minister Jean Max Bellerive. “Wjc will be very unhappy if that’s the case,” Ms. Graham warned Ms. Mills, using the initials of the former president.

Ms. Graham, who was also chief of staff to Mr. Clinton at the foundation, had other reasons to worry: “I’m also staying at [Mr. Bellerive’s] house fyi so exposure in general and this weekend in particular for wjc on this.”

So Clinton Foundation staff was hobnobbing with a powerful Haitian politician and using connections at the State Department to try to influence U.S. policy decisions involving that same politician. That’s unethical and it is also contrary to what Mrs. Clinton promised when she went before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in January 2009 as president-elect Barack Obama’s secretary of state nominee.

Read more: http://hotair.com/archives/2016/09/19/wsj-clinton-foundation-lobbied-state-visa-haitian-pm-exec-stayed-house/

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum