Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Senator Bernie Sanders on Democratic Socialism in the United States

5 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


https://berniesanders.com/democratic-socialism-in-the-united-states/

@ Georgetown University, Nov. 19, 2015:

"In his inaugural remarks in January 1937, in the midst of the Great Depression, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt looked out at the nation and this is what he saw.

He saw tens of millions of its citizens denied the basic necessities of life.

He saw millions of families trying to live on incomes so meager that the pall of family disaster hung over them day by day.

He saw millions denied education, recreation, and the opportunity to better their lot and the lot of their children.

He saw millions lacking the means to buy the products they needed and by their poverty and lack of disposable income denying employment to many other millions.

He saw one-third of a nation ill-housed, ill-clad, ill-nourished.

And he acted. Against the ferocious opposition of the ruling class of his day, people he called economic royalists, Roosevelt implemented a series of programs that put millions of people back to work, took them out of poverty and restored their faith in government. He redefined the relationship of the federal government to the people of our country. He combatted cynicism, fear and despair. He reinvigorated democracy. He transformed the country.

And that is what we have to do today.

And, by the way, almost everything he proposed was called “socialist.” Social Security, which transformed life for the elderly in this country was “socialist.” The concept of the “minimum wage” was seen as a radical intrusion into the marketplace and was described as “socialist.” Unemployment insurance, abolishing child labor, the 40-hour work week, collective bargaining, strong banking regulations, deposit insurance, and job programs that put millions of people to work were all described, in one way or another, as “socialist.” Yet, these programs have become the fabric of our nation and the foundation of the middle class.

Thirty years later, in the 1960s, President Johnson passed Medicare and Medicaid to provide health care to millions of senior citizens and families with children, persons with disabilities and some of the most vulnerable people in this county. Once again these vitally important programs were derided by the right wing as socialist programs that were a threat to our American way of life.

That was then. Now is now.

Today, in 2015, despite the Wall Street crash of 2008, which drove this country into the worst economic downturn since the Depression, the American people are clearly better off economically than we were in 1937.

But, here is a very hard truth that we must acknowledge and address. Despite a huge increase in technology and productivity, despite major growth in the U.S. and global economy, tens of millions of American families continue to lack the basic necessities of life, while millions more struggle every day to provide a minimal standard of living for their families. The reality is that for the last 40 years the great middle class of this country has been in decline and faith in our political system is now extremely low.

The rich get much richer. Almost everyone else gets poorer. Super PACs funded by billionaires buy elections. Ordinary people don’t vote. We have an economic and political crisis in this country and the same old, same old establishment politics and economics will not effectively address it.

If we are serious about transforming our country, if we are serious about rebuilding the middle class, if we are serious about reinvigorating our democracy, we need to develop a political movement which, once again, is prepared to take on and defeat a ruling class whose greed is destroying our nation. The billionaire class cannot have it all. Our government belongs to all of us, and not just the one percent.

We need to create a culture which, as Pope Francis reminds us, cannot just be based on the worship of money. We must not accept a nation in which billionaires compete as to the size of their super-yachts, while children in America go hungry and veterans sleep out on the streets.

Today, in America, we are the wealthiest nation in the history of the world, but few Americans know that because so much of the new income and wealth goes to the people on top. In fact, over the last 30 years, there has been a massive transfer of wealth – trillions of wealth – going from the middle class to the top one-tenth of 1 percent – a handful of people who have seen a doubling of the percentage of the wealth they own over that period.

Unbelievably, and grotesquely, the top one-tenth of 1 percent owns nearly as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent.

Today, in America, millions of our people are working two or three jobs just to survive. In fact, Americans work longer hours than do the people of any industrialized country. Despite the incredibly hard work and long hours of the American middle class, 58 percent of all new income generated today is going to the top one percent.

Today, in America, as the middle class continues to disappear, median family income, is $4,100 less than it was in 1999. The median male worker made over $700 less than he did 42 years ago, after adjusting for inflation. Last year, the median female worker earned more than $1,000 less than she did in 2007.

Today, in America, the wealthiest country in the history of the world, more than half of older workers have no retirement savings – zero – while millions of elderly and people with disabilities are trying to survive on $12,000 or $13,000 a year. From Vermont to California, older workers are scared to death. “How will I retire with dignity?,” they ask?

Today, in America, nearly 47 million Americans are living in poverty and over 20 percent of our children, including 36 percent of African American children, are living in poverty — the highest rate of childhood poverty of nearly any major country on earth.

Today, in America, 29 million Americans have no health insurance and even more are underinsured with outrageously high co-payments and deductibles. Further, with the United States paying the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs, 1 out of 5 patients cannot afford to fill the prescriptions their doctors write.

Today, in America, youth unemployment and underemployment is over 35 percent. Meanwhile, we have more people in jail than any other country and countless lives are being destroyed as we spend $80 billion a year locking up fellow Americans.

The bottom line is that today in America we not only have massive wealth and income inequality, but a power structure which protects that inequality. A handful of super-wealthy campaign contributors have enormous influence over the political process, while their lobbyists determine much of what goes on in Congress.

In 1944, in his State of the Union speech, President Roosevelt outlined what he called a second Bill of Rights. This is one of the most important speeches ever made by a president but, unfortunately, it has not gotten the attention that it deserves.

In that remarkable speech this is what Roosevelt stated, and I quote: “We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. Necessitous men are not free men.” End of quote. In other words, real freedom must include economic security. That was Roosevelt’s vision 70 years ago. It is my vision today. It is a vision that we have not yet achieved. It is time that we did.

In that speech, Roosevelt described the economic rights that he believed every American was entitled to: The right to a decent job at decent pay, the right to adequate food, clothing, and time off from work, the right for every business, large and small, to function in an atmosphere free from unfair competition and domination by monopolies. The right of all Americans to have a decent home and decent health care.

What Roosevelt was stating in 1944, what Martin Luther King, Jr. stated in similar terms 20 years later and what I believe today, is that true freedom does not occur without economic security..."

Guest


Guest

Growing the size and scope of govt while increasing the peoples dependence on it will not solve your subjective inequities. Ensuring equal opportunity is the greatest service that govt can provide. Equal outcomes aren't realistically attainable.

Markle

Markle

PkrBum wrote:Growing the size and scope of govt while increasing the peoples dependence on it will not solve your subjective inequities. Ensuring equal opportunity is the greatest service that govt can provide. Equal outcomes aren't realistically attainable.

Socialists can NEVER point to anyplace where Socialism has worked before. They never will.

Nope, not any of the Scandanavian countries. They are simply taxed to death so they have no ability to move up from the class they are born into. They're stagnant all their lives with mediocrity. Imagine charging 180 percent TAX to buy a new car.

As for our Socialist good friend Bernie Sanders, here's what he said:

SANDERS TO CHARITIES: DROP DEAD

POSTED ON APRIL 3, 2016 BY STEVEN HAYWARD IN 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, BERNIE SANDERS

From a 1981 New York Times story, revealing Bernie Sanders as the full totalitarian he is underneath his “democratic” socialism:

For the kickoff of the 40th annual Chittenden County United Way fund-raising drive in Burlington, Vt., the sponsors considered themselves fortunate to have as guests Mayor Bernard Sanders of Burlington and Gov. Richard Snelling of Vermont. . .

”I don’t believe in charities,” said Mayor Sanders, bringing a shocked silence to a packed hotel banquet room. The Mayor, who is a Socialist, went on to question the ”fundamental concepts on which charities are based” and contended that government, rather than charity organizations, should take over responsibility for social programs.


There you have it. Given than so many charities are left-leaning, it is revealing to see how much Sanders hates competition of any kind.

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2016/04/sanders-to-charities-drop-dead.php

knothead

knothead

Nope, not any of the Scandanavian countries. They are simply taxed to death so they have no ability to move up from the class they are born into. They're stagnant all their lives with mediocrity. Imagine charging 180 percent TAX to buy a new car.


Wow, that's odd . . . . . Denmark ranks as the happiest country in the world!

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

PkrBum wrote:Growing the size and scope of govt while increasing the peoples dependence on it will not solve your subjective inequities. Ensuring equal opportunity is the greatest service that govt can provide. Equal outcomes aren't realistically attainable.

Really? Did you arrive at that conclusion all by yourself, or did you have help?

Guest


Guest

Floridatexan wrote:
PkrBum wrote:Growing the size and scope of govt while increasing the peoples dependence on it will not solve your subjective inequities. Ensuring equal opportunity is the greatest service that govt can provide. Equal outcomes aren't realistically attainable.

Really? Did you arrive at that conclusion all by yourself, or did you have help?

Common sense. Let's say you want a law enacted that outlaws your competitors product. Would you go to a clerk at the courthouse... or would you lobby your state or federal representative? Power is the corrupting factor. Right?

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

PkrBum wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:
PkrBum wrote:Growing the size and scope of govt while increasing the peoples dependence on it will not solve your subjective inequities. Ensuring equal opportunity is the greatest service that govt can provide. Equal outcomes aren't realistically attainable.

Really?  Did you arrive at that conclusion all by yourself, or did you have help?

Common sense. Let's say you want a law enacted that outlaws your competitors product. Would you go to a clerk at the courthouse... or would you lobby your state or federal representative? Power is the corrupting factor. Right?

Seriously? First of all, I wouldn't stoop to trying to destroy the competition through political means. That's unethical. And I never advocated "equal outcomes"...whatever that means.

Guest


Guest

Then you apparently support an ideology of which you know little about. Redistribution and so called social justice are the keystones of leftist movements... atleast until they are able to gain enough power to drop the pretense. It's not a secret.

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

PkrBum wrote:Then you apparently support an ideology of which you know little about. Redistribution and so called social justice are the keystones of leftist movements... atleast until they are able to gain enough power to drop the pretense. It's not a secret.


I'd go further. Public execution of ultra wealthy capitalists who have exploited thousands of people with no regard for their humanity, seems a good idea to me.
And to Don Trump, it appears .... Lol

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

PkrBum wrote:Growing the size and scope of govt while increasing the peoples dependence on it will not solve your subjective inequities. Ensuring equal opportunity is the greatest service that govt can provide. Equal outcomes aren't realistically attainable.


Yes sir!

Floridatexan

Floridatexan

Joanimaroni wrote:
PkrBum wrote:Growing the size and scope of govt while increasing the peoples dependence on it will not solve your subjective inequities. Ensuring equal opportunity is the greatest service that govt can provide. Equal outcomes aren't realistically attainable.


Yes sir!

Idiotic semantic psychobabble.

Markle

Markle

knothead wrote: Nope, not any of the Scandanavian countries. They are simply taxed to death so they have no ability to move up from the class they are born into. They're stagnant all their lives with mediocrity. Imagine charging 180 percent TAX to buy a new car.

Wow, that's odd . . . . . Denmark ranks as the happiest country in the world!

Do you know the criterion?

Since you do not, you don't know of what you speak do you?

Sorry, liberals, Scandinavian countries aren’t utopiasBy Kyle Smith January 11, 2015

Those sky-high happiness surveys, it turns out, are mostly bunk. Asking people “Are you happy?” means different things in different cultures. In Japan, for instance, answering “Yes” seems like boasting, Booth points out. Whereas in Denmark, it’s considered “shameful to be unhappy,” newspaper editor Anne Knudsen says in the book.

Moreover, there is a group of people that believes the Danes are lying when they say they’re the happiest people on the planet. This group is known as “Danes.”

“Over the years I have asked many Danes about these happiness surveys — whether they really believe that they are the global happiness champions — and I have yet to meet a single one of them who seriously believes it’s true,” Booth writes. “They tend to approach the subject of their much-vaunted happiness like the victims of a practical joke waiting to discover who the perpetrator is.”

[...]

http://nypost.com/2015/01/11/sorry-liberals-scandinavian-countries-arent-utopias/

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum