SheWrites wrote:boards of FL wrote:TEOTWAWKI wrote:boards of FL wrote:TEOTWAWKI wrote:You banned me 7 times butthead....!boards of FL wrote:TEOTWAWKI wrote:boards of FL wrote:PkrBum wrote:Wow... that opinion took a major disassociative disorder seagoat. Most of the conservative leaning members here have been run off by vile treatment and personal attacks... going so far as to call employers and threaten worse.
That you can turn that around into an indictment of those people is spectacularly biased. You've just been awarded leftist mental conditioning level 9... congratulations comrade. You are now entitled to create your own propaganda.
Are you suggesting that someone called Pacedog's employer - or worse - and that is why he deleted himself?
Pacedog ran off because he's a dumbass. This is the same reason that you ran of when you did, election-boy. And it's the same reason that Damaged ran off. It's the same reason that TEO has ran off several times.
I was gone because a total asshole named boards banned me every chance he got trying his damnedest to run me off..
So the narrative is that you only ever leave because I ban you? This is your honest narrative? You never delete yourself in a fit of butthurt because you're not capable enough to post in the correct forum?
Of course I have, but I have never deleted your account - which is what we're talking about. Can you not read? I have given you three day bans when you regularly flood the general discussion section with politics. On the other hand, you have probably deleted yourself at least eight times due to the fact that you're a mentally unstable moron. That's on you.
You banned me for a week at times..Anyone would get fed up with your bias. You are just so full of prejudice for your agenda you can't handle anyone that differs with your warped ideology....you're just a sneaky little rat that has a tiny little bit of power and can't resist using it...
I see. Well that's very interesting.
Do any republicans have anything to say with respect to the actual subject matter of the thread? So far we have two entries from our village idiots - neither of which address the actual subject matter of the thread.
Who wants to be the first to stand corrected?
You are like a 1950s stern father, Boards. Demanding from your children whether they want to comply with your standards or not.
Humorous...
With my standards? Our forum members and many out there flocked to social media and various internet channels for months upon months openly demonizating Planned Parenthood, all the way up until a near government shutdown and ultimately a mass shooting. And they did that without any evidence or even any specific explanation as to why they were outraged. Are you telling me that such behavior is deemed acceptable by your standards? Are you telling me that you take no issue with someone ignorantly repeating a narrative that is specifically intended to cause harm to an organization like Planned Parenthood - which, again, has done absolutely nothing wrong - as well as indirect harm to people who work in women's clinics?
And what's amazing is that out of all the people to call out here, you pick me! The guy who called bullshit on this story from day 1! You completely gloss over the useful idiots who parroted this story for months leading a mass shooting, there is absolutely no problem there in your mind. But that damned boards who points all of this out! That's just ridiculous! How dare he!
Let's say that I produced a heavily edited video that seems to depict Glenn Beck confessing to rape and murder. And let's say that I really hammer that as if it's a legit story. Let's say that it really catches on, and plenty of useful idiots begin to parrot my completely fabricated story. Then let's imagine that someone kills Glenn Beck as he leaves his radio studio for the night, and in their confession they cite my video as motivation.
Is that OK with your standards? Don't you see anything wrong with that? And then imagine that someone points out the fact "Hey! That's bullshit! Why perpetuate the idea that Glenn Beck rapes and murders when there is no evidence?" What would you say to them? Would you accuse them of being a stern 1950s father?