Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Climate Change Proponents Want to Take Away Your Hamburgers

2 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Why beef is the new SUV

http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/29/opinions/sutter-beef-suv-cliamte-two-degrees/index.html

Exerpt:

But eating beef, as I'll explain, has come to be seen, rightly, in certain enviro circles, as the new SUV -- a hopelessly selfish, American indulgence; a middle finger to the planet. It's not the main driver of global warming -- that's burning fossil fuels for electricity, heat and transportation -- but it does contribute significantly.

Globally, 14.5% of all greenhouse gas pollution can be attributed to livestock, according to the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization, the most reputable authority on this topic. And a huge hunk of the livestock industry's role -- 65% -- comes from raising beef and dairy cattle.



Climate Change Proponents Want to Take Away Your Hamburgers 15092510

So, not only does the author rail against beef consumption, he also starts railing against corn production, which is used to feed cows at feedlots. He says corn production facilitates lots of CO2 emissions, because of the powered farm equipment used to plant, maintain, fertilize, and harvest the crop. What does this nut propose that we eat if he wants to remove animal agriculture, and farming of major crops that supposedly contribute to climate change?

The next thing they will be clamoring for is a climate change index for the food you eat so you can be guilt-tripped into feasting on a mostly climate-friendly menu. The author alludes to such--see the graph above that I copied from the article.

Eat your steaks and fire-up your barbeques before either or both are outlawed, because you can see where this movement is headed, and surely its political arm will eventually be pressuring lawmakers in this direction.

-Eating 0.5 kg of beef is equivalent to driving a car 100 km-

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Guest


Guest

It's just a matter of time... and there's no secret being made of it. Imagine the authoritarian controls necessary.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

I think I will give this thread a bump.... Cool

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

I guess I need to give this thread another bump....  Shocked

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Guest


Guest

Less and less meat. Better health. Fish and veggie proteins. Yum.

Sal

Sal

Why in the world would you think that ridiculing an individual's suggestion, in any way, discounts the scientific consensus.

Rest assured, you remain a denier of science.

Rest assured, you remain on the wrong side of history ...

... along with Markle and PeeDawg.

That should tell you something.

It's telling that it doesn't.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

This is the future of beef farming, if PETA will allow the animals to be tortured this way. These are Methane Backpacks:

Climate Change Proponents Want to Take Away Your Hamburgers Cow-gas-tank-404_686141c

The cow must be operated on, and a tube inserted into one of the animal's two stomachs from the outside. I would imagine this would greatly increase the cost of beef production, putting this food out of reach of much of the lower and middle classes.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

SheWrites wrote:Less and less meat.  Better health.  Fish and veggie proteins.  Yum.  

No fish..... The author of the articles I cited states that commercial fishing is a great contributor of GHG emissions. Those fishing boats burn copious amounts of diesel, and the CO2 comes with that.

But he also lashes out at corn farming. Tractors, trucks, trains --all burners of diesel-- are all in the corn farming loop,  so you have the same problem with fishing. But, if you go to animal traction using oxen pulling plows instead of using tractors, you have the problem with methane emissions, so they will have to use methane backpacks.

There is no way to win here, and your food costs are going to skyrocket, regardless.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Salinsky wrote:Why in the world would you think that ridiculing an individual's suggestion, in any way, discounts the scientific consensus.

Rest assured, you remain a denier of science.

Rest assured, you remain on the wrong side of history ...

... along with Markle and PeeDawg.

That should tell you something.

It's telling that it doesn't.

Thank you for posting, Mr. Sal. Now, what I am looking for from you and Boards (and a couple of others) is to put your money where your keyboard is. Seriously, I want one of you to serve your family a landfill salad, just like they did at the UN recently, and come back here and tell us how it tasted. I also want you to try to eat all of the food that comes into your house and not throw any of it away-no matter how unappealing it is (so long as it is not spoiled with food-illness causing bacteria)---and tell us how that works. Obviously, there is a method to learn where it comes to eating everything so nothing is wasted. There is a lot to teach the rest of us.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Sal

Sal

I can only say that we do our best not to waste food.

We do our best not to waste fuel.

We do our best to reduce our waste and increase our recycling.

We do not deny the science.

Guest


Guest

Your best sucks... unless you realize the goals of your dear leaders they'll squeeze the life outa you and yours

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum