Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Iran gives middle finger to Obama and other P5+1 nations about ballistic missile restrictions

Iran gives middle finger to Obama and other P5+1 nations about ballistic missile restrictions

+2
ZVUGKTUBM
2seaoat
6 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Guest


Guest

http://freebeacon.com/national-security/iran-vows-to-violate-un-restrictions-on-ballistic-missiles/

Like the world has seen, we got hoodwinked....

2seaoat



And when Israel does a first strike attack on Iran, do you think their donkey delivery system will be sufficient second strike capability to deter Israel from doing what they did to Syria and Iraq? I have heard they have developed a stealth donkey delivery system.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Since we can't beat 'em on the nuclear deal, we will just change our complaint to one about their ballistic missile capability. Many nations possess ballistic missiles, and not all of them are friendly to the United States.

Iranian ballistic missiles cannot reach the United States. Nothing to worry about here.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Guest


Guest

Only an idiot would trust the worlds largest terrorism sponsor to comply with an agreement that has no teeth.

They got everything they wanted... why settle for that?

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI

Yeah why would Iran be nervous about our intentions?

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/08/is-america-the-worlds-largest-sponsor-of-terrorism.html

Chomsky and Herman observed that terror was concentrated in the U.S. sphere of influence in the Third World, and documented terror carried out by U.S. client states in Latin America. They observed that of ten Latin American countries that had death squads, all were U.S. client states.

***

They concluded that the global rise in state terror was a result of U.S. foreign policy.

***

In 1991, a book edited by Alexander L. George [the Graham H. Stuart Professor of Political Science Emeritus at Stanford University] also argued that other Western powers sponsored terror in Third World countries. It concluded that the U.S. and its allies were the main supporters of terrorism throughout the world.

Some in the American military have intentionally tried to “out-terrorize the terrorist

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Yeah why would Iran be nervous about our intentions?

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2012/08/is-america-the-worlds-largest-sponsor-of-terrorism.html

   Chomsky and Herman observed that terror was concentrated in the U.S. sphere of influence in the Third World, and documented terror carried out by U.S. client states in Latin America. They observed that of ten Latin American countries that had death squads, all were U.S. client states.

   ***

   They concluded that the global rise in state terror was a result of U.S. foreign policy.

   ***

   In 1991, a book edited by Alexander L. George [the Graham H. Stuart Professor of Political Science Emeritus at Stanford University] also argued that other Western powers sponsored terror in Third World countries. It concluded that the U.S. and its allies were the main supporters of terrorism throughout the world.

Some in the American military have intentionally tried  to “out-terrorize the terrorist

Excellent points. I don't think the Iranians have a lock on sponsoring terrorism throughout the world. Western nations have used different forms of violence to terrorize smaller nations throughout history, especially when western bankers and businessmen wanted to exploit the workers and resources for profit.

I am reading a Kindle book that touches on aspects of this, and for America, imperialism really began at the end of the 19th Century, when we looked to wrest Cuba and the Philippines from Spain, and annex Hawaii. Of course, we did this under the guise of promoting democracy and "civilizing" the native populations. But the real reason was purely and solely economic exploitation of the conquered states.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

PkrBum wrote:Only an idiot would trust the worlds largest terrorism sponsor to comply with an agreement that has no teeth.

They got everything they wanted... why settle for that?

AND they got a $140 BILLION bonus to use for worldwide terrorism.

Russia is selling them missiles and other weapons. What makes any fool think it would beneath Russia's ethics to sell Iran ICBM's. Especially in exchange for OIL.

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

What did the US get? Just the chants "Death to America."

EmeraldGhost

EmeraldGhost

Joanimaroni wrote:What did the US get? Just the chants "Death to America."

Well, we didn't have to enter into any agreement to get those.  They've been giving them to us for free for decades now.

Personally, I think it is possible to make a deal with Iran. They're not all crazies. But like Donald Trump said (and I paraphrase) ... "we shoulda made a better deal"

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Markle wrote:Russia is selling them missiles and other weapons.  What makes any fool think it would beneath Russia's ethics to sell Iran ICBM's.  Especially in exchange for OIL.

That is the dorkiest assessment semi-demented poster Markle has made on this forum. First, Russia is a major oil producer and does not have any need to import Iranian oil. Second, the notion that Russia would export ICBMs to other countries is so silly that I split my sides just reading this.... Cool

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Pensacola Discussion Forum » Politics » Iran gives middle finger to Obama and other P5+1 nations about ballistic missile restrictions

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum