1,100 dead American citizens soon in 2015

Double for Black American Citizens.....you know those uppity drivers.......

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/us-police-killings-headed-for-1100-this-year-with-black-americans-twice-as-likely-to-die/ar-AAcpepE

Black babies are five times more likely to be aborted too.

PkrBum wrote:Black babies are five times more likely to be aborted too.

Are you saying that, holding all else constant, a black woman is five times more likely than a white woman to abort a pregnancy?  Are you saying that the variable of skin color alone is what correlates with the 5x increased likelihood of abortion in the stat that you cite above.

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Black babies are five times more likely to be aborted too.

Are you saying that, holding all else constant, a black woman is five times more likely than a white woman to abort a pregnancy?  Are you saying that the variable of skin color alone is what correlates with the 5x increased likelihood of abortion in the stat that you cite above.

for the slow to comprehend......

http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html

"Several years ago, when 17,000 aborted babies were found in a dumpster outside a pathology laboratory in Los, Angeles, California, some 12-15,000 were observed to be black."


According to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, black women are more than 5 times as likely as white women to have an abortion

On average, 1,876 black babies are aborted every day in the United States.

RACIST BABY KILLERS..!!

If you've never read the real history of margaret sanger... you should. She was a despicable hatefull person.

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Black babies are five times more likely to be aborted too.

Are you saying that, holding all else constant, a black woman is five times more likely than a white woman to abort a pregnancy?  Are you saying that the variable of skin color alone is what correlates with the 5x increased likelihood of abortion in the stat that you cite above.

for the slow to comprehend......

http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html

"Several years ago, when 17,000 aborted babies were found in a dumpster outside a pathology laboratory in Los, Angeles, California, some 12-15,000 were observed to be black."


According to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, black women are more than 5 times as likely as white women to have an abortion

On average, 1,876 black babies are aborted every day in the United States.

You just repeated the stat but you didn't answer my question.

Do you not understand the question? Because I can try dumbing it down a bit if you don't.

boards of FL wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Black babies are five times more likely to be aborted too.

Are you saying that, holding all else constant, a black woman is five times more likely than a white woman to abort a pregnancy?  Are you saying that the variable of skin color alone is what correlates with the 5x increased likelihood of abortion in the stat that you cite above.

for the slow to comprehend......

http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html

"Several years ago, when 17,000 aborted babies were found in a dumpster outside a pathology laboratory in Los, Angeles, California, some 12-15,000 were observed to be black."


According to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, black women are more than 5 times as likely as white women to have an abortion

On average, 1,876 black babies are aborted every day in the United States.

You just repeated the stat but you didn't answer my question.

Do you not understand the question?  Because I can try dumbing it down a bit if you don't.

Shove your lameassed questions where the sun don't shine you are like a 10year old asking why why why....

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Black babies are five times more likely to be aborted too.

Are you saying that, holding all else constant, a black woman is five times more likely than a white woman to abort a pregnancy?  Are you saying that the variable of skin color alone is what correlates with the 5x increased likelihood of abortion in the stat that you cite above.

Well?

Did you lose that reading comprehension link again?

boards of FL wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Black babies are five times more likely to be aborted too.

Are you saying that, holding all else constant, a black woman is five times more likely than a white woman to abort a pregnancy?  Are you saying that the variable of skin color alone is what correlates with the 5x increased likelihood of abortion in the stat that you cite above.

Well?

Your questions are based on some notion that you can set a clever trap with them..you can't they just make you look stupid. Keep asking though I might buy you a sucker to shut you up....

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Black babies are five times more likely to be aborted too.

Are you saying that, holding all else constant, a black woman is five times more likely than a white woman to abort a pregnancy?  Are you saying that the variable of skin color alone is what correlates with the 5x increased likelihood of abortion in the stat that you cite above.

for the slow to comprehend......

http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html

"Several years ago, when 17,000 aborted babies were found in a dumpster outside a pathology laboratory in Los, Angeles, California, some 12-15,000 were observed to be black."


According to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, black women are more than 5 times as likely as white women to have an abortion

On average, 1,876 black babies are aborted every day in the United States.

You just repeated the stat but you didn't answer my question.

Do you not understand the question?  Because I can try dumbing it down a bit if you don't.

Shove your lameassed questions where the sun don't shine you are like a 10year old asking why why why....

Let me give you an example.  Let's say you're an investigative reporter and you want to see if there is any correlation between health and political views.  First, you decide to find some liberals and then ask them about their health.  You happen to be at the gym one day and you ask aloud "Hey, is anyone in here a liberal?"  Several people raise their hands and then you ask them about their health.

Later, you're a Golden Corral on 1/2 price deep fried night.  You ask aloud "Are their any conservatives in here?"  Several raise their hands and then you proceed to ask them about their health.

Not surprisingly, it turns out that the liberals were more healthy than the conservatives.  

Would it be ethical of you to publish the headline "Liberals are more healthy than conservatives" based upon your research?  Did you do your due diligence in controlling for other variables that would influence your subjects' health beyond political beliefs?  (Hint:  The liberals that you interviewed were all working out in a gym and the conservatives were pigging out at Golden Corral on deep fried night)

Now lets apply this to PkrBum's comment when he said black babies are five times as likely to be aborted.  I asked him a fairly straightforward question about that stat.  Certain variables correlate with the likelihood of abortion:  Income level, marital status, drug use, level of educational attainment, etc., etc.

Does PkrBum's figure control for those so as to isolate the effects of being black or white with the liklihood of abortion?  Or did some statistically illiterate person see pile of babies in a dumpster and then make that conclusion based solely upon the skin color present in the pile and absent of any other variable?

PkrBum wrote:Did you lose that reading comprehension link again?

Nope. I still have that.

Can you not even answer a question as straightforward as the one that I asked you? I'm not even asking you to elaborate on a subjective opinion here. You cited a stat. I asked you to clarify that stat. Did it control for any variables that influence the likelihood of abortion, or did it not? This is comparable to "What time is it, PkrBum?" Your options here are "Yes, no, or I don't know"

If you're not smart enough to find the words to communicate a response on your own, can you at least link me to the source of that stat and then I'll answer the question for the rest of the forum?

control

Don't pull that fancy pants statistics stuff.....we don't need no damn controls.....we got thin air.

boards of FL wrote:

PkrBum wrote:Did you lose that reading comprehension link again?

Nope.  I still have that.

Can you not even answer a question as straightforward as the one that I asked you?  I'm not even asking you to elaborate on a subjective opinion here.  You cited a stat.  I asked you to clarify that stat.  Did it control for any variables that influence the likelihood of abortion, or did it not?  This is comparable to "What time is it, PkrBum?"  Your options here are "Yes, no, or I don't know"

If you're not smart enough to find the words to communicate a response on your own, can you at least link me to the source of that stat and then I'll answer the question for the rest of the forum?

I linked you to the source Blackgenocide..but you must have missed it...

http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html


http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html



http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html



http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html

Your questions are never straightforward.

http://m.youtube.com/?#/watch?v=FLbEKpL-5Z0

TEOTWAWKI wrote:http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html



http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html




http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html






PICK ONE !

From what I can gather, they're 1) looking at the total number of abortions, 2) looking at the racial makeup, and then 3) ignoring all else and simply attributing likelihood to skin color.

That's about as unethical as it gets in the world of stats.

Then again, if neither of you even understood my question to begin with, this fact probably doesn't resonate with you at all.