Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

56% of Registered Voters Want Congress to Continue Investigating Benghazi

+4
ZVUGKTUBM
Floridatexan
2seaoat
Markle
8 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Markle

Markle

Fox News Poll: 56 Percent Want Congress To Continue Investigating Benghazi

[Only 38% say no]

Dana Blanton, FOX News: Politics
Thu, 05/14/2015 - 12:21pm

A majority of voters wants Congress to continue to investigate the Obama administration’s handling of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi that killed four Americans.  They also assign some appreciable blame to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for what happened there, according to a new Fox News poll.

Read more:
http://www.wopular.com/fox-news-poll-56-percent-want-congress-continue-investigating-benghazi

How much do you blame Clinton for Benghazi?

Great Deal/Some    56%
Not Much/None       39%

Trey Gowdy:  State Department refuses to turn over Emails for past six months.



Last edited by Markle on 5/17/2015, 6:12 pm; edited 1 time in total

2seaoat



Why is the word "continuing" used.....too funny.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


A Fox News poll, you say? That must be accurate.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

Floridatexan wrote:
A Fox News poll, you say?  That must be accurate.

Semi-demented poster Markle is just shoveling shit again. There is not a Republican anywhere who can defeat Hillary Clinton if she chooses to run, and he knows this. Still, there will be much more propaganda from him as November 2016 gets closer.

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

Fox News asks it's hardcore viewers if they want to punish our first black president more, and they vote YES! Once again Semi-sane Markle strikes a blow for insanity ...

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


How much is enough?

http://thinkprogress.org/world/2014/03/26/3419097/pentagon-congress-benghazi-waste/

Pentagon: Congress's Benghazi Witchhunts Have Cost Millions of Dollars

POSTED ON MARCH 26, 2014 AT 10:17 AM

"The Department of Defense has spent millions of dollars and thousands of hours trying to fulfill requests from Congress’s six investigations into Benghazi, according to a letter from the Pentagon to a top-ranking Democrat.
“The Department has devoted thousands of man-hours to responding to the numerous and often repetitive congressional requests regarding Benghazi,” Assistant Secretary of Defense for Legislative Affairs Elizabeth King said in a letter to Congress dated earlier this month. That estimate includes “time devoted to approximately 50 congressional hearings, briefings, and interviews which the Department has led or participated in.” While no total calculation has been completed yet, King estimated that total cost of compliance with Congress’ requests to the Pentagon and other agencies runs “into the millions of dollars.”
“We continue to work fervently to address outstanding items,” King continued, including document requests and additional interviews — including with people who have already submitted to previous hearings or interviews. “Since the tragic events of September 2012, we have made every effort to provide information to the various congressional committees regarding Department’s actions in response to the attacks, and have accommodated Congress’ every request regardless of expense,” King wrote in the letter, which was sent to Rep. Adam Smith (D-CA), ranking member on the House Armed Services Committee. Committee chairman Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon (R-CA) was also sent a copy of the letter.
Smith first contacted the Pentagon last month to “gain a better understanding of the resources exhausted” in the DOD response to the now multiyear investigation into the Obama administration’s response to the attacks in Benghazi, Libya. According to The Hill, following the Pentagon’s response, Smith reached out to McKeon to call off the witch-hunt that has to date produced no evidence of nefarious wrongdoing on the part of the White House, Pentagon, State Department, or intelligence community. “We must stop wasting this committee’s and our military’s scarce resources chasing a scandal that does not exist,” Smith wrote..."

That was more than a year ago, PeeDog. What do you think the public really wants?

KarlRove

KarlRove

Hillionaire is guilty

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

KarlRove wrote:Hillionaire is guilty

You could be serving under President Hillionaire after January of 2017. We can't wait to see what kind of whining you engage in thern.....

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:Fox News asks it's hardcore viewers if they want to punish our first black president more, and they vote YES!  Once again Semi-sane Markle strikes a blow for insanity ...

Show us.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


Who is "us"?

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2015/feb/26/fact-checks-behind-daily-shows-50-fox-news-lies/

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

[quote="Markle"]
Wordslinger wrote:Fox News asks it's hardcore viewers if they want to punish our first black president more, and they vote YES!  Once again Semi-sane Markle strikes a blow for insanity ...

Show us.


My guess would be that Hardcore conservatives make up 60% of Fox's audience, and the remainder are just conservatives. The fact that Fox says 37% are no longer pursuing the issue is truly astounding!



VectorMan

VectorMan

All that corruption BS and lying about money was always going to bite Bill and Hildibeast right in the ass. Ahhhh karma. Crash & burn Hildibeast. CRASH & BURN! LOL. No one is more deserving. Would almost be fun to watch if t wasn't so sad.

VOTE CLINTON .... LOL .... Go ahead and vote for her ....

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:Fox News asks it's hardcore viewers if they want to punish our first black president more, and they vote YES!  Once again Semi-sane Markle strikes a blow for insanity ...

Show us.


My guess would be that  Hardcore conservatives make up 60% of Fox's audience, and the remainder are just conservatives. The fact that Fox says 37% are no longer pursuing the issue is truly astounding!


As you know, but wish to lie about here, they do not poll only their viewers.

Keep up the good work. You are a terrific foil!

2seaoat



I do not know who participated in the poll, but certainly being brain dead was a prerequisite. If Hillary Clinton was in the line of command and told the American military to back off.......that would be a story where a leader balanced the mission against the particulars of a deployment. The American military lost close to 5k and there could be an investigation on the line command of each of those deaths under BOTH Presidents.....but America is not retarded and understands that a CIA or military deployment has inherent risks and people die.

The investigations to date have made it clear that the Military responded properly and that Hillary is not a line commander of the Military.....now stupid cannot be fixed, and sophomoric manipulation by propaganda does not have anything to do with reality......Gomer is toothless.

boards of FL

boards of FL

"Fox News Poll:..."


Yeah.  We can really stop reading at "Fox News Poll".   Actually, we can stop reading at "Fox News"

A better title to this thread would be "Recent Fox News Poll demonstrates the fact that viewers of the channel are generally of the low information variety."



56% of Registered Voters Want Congress to Continue Investigating Benghazi PQgOpAy


_________________
I approve this message.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:
Markle wrote:
Wordslinger wrote:Fox News asks it's hardcore viewers if they want to punish our first black president more, and they vote YES!  Once again Semi-sane Markle strikes a blow for insanity ...

Show us.


My guess would be that  Hardcore conservatives make up 60% of Fox's audience, and the remainder are just conservatives. The fact that Fox says 37% are no longer pursuing the issue is truly astounding!


Come on, give it another try. You've shown us nothing. You made a declarative statement and now your back pedaling. Why?

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum