Boards new jobs report is full of FRAUD

The New Jobs Report Is Pure Fraud

Here we go again. The latest jobs report is out — and it’s pure fraud. Fantasy. Bogus. Lies and propaganda passed off as “good news.” The reality is it’s a disaster for America and our middle class.

The “facts” released by our “honest and transparent government” report 248,000 new jobs created, beating expectations by a mile. The “facts” report unemployment dropping to 5.9%, the lowest since 2008.

It’s as if Obama is saying, “If you like your job, you can keep it.”

But you can’t. It’s no more truthful or realistic than, “If you like your insurance, you can keep it.” Same fraud. Same lies. Same propaganda. Same “Banana Republic media” reporting fantasy as truth.

Here’s the nightmare — the real facts about the latest jobs report.

First the reason unemployment dropped to the fantasy level of 5.9% is that 315,000 more Americans dropped out of the Labor Force (in one month).

Where did they go? Most of them dropped off unemployment to get on welfare, food stamps or disability. Many of them waited until reaching age 62 or 65 to join the Social Security rolls. They just barely hung on until retirement age and will never work again. Where will America get the money to pay for all these welfare, food stamp, disability and Social Security checks? We’re already broke. This just adds to the crushing, unsustainable $18 trillion debt.

This isn’t good news. It’s a disaster.

Adding to the misery, the Labor Force Participation rate just dropped to the lowest in 36 years. There are now 92.6 million working-age Americans not working.

This isn’t good news. It’s a disaster.

Like those late night infomercials say: “But wait. There’s more!”

How can 248,000 new jobs be a good thing if average hourly wages just dropped for only the 6th time since the failure of Lehman Brothers?

The middle class isn’t getting richer, it’s getting poorer. Under Obama we are struggling to survive, we are struggling to pay bills — that’s if we keep our jobs.

This isn’t good news. It’s a disaster.

The bad news is coming in waves. The only people being hired are your grandparents. 230,000 of the new jobs went to those in the 55 to 69 year old age group. In the prime working age group of 24 to 54 years old, 10,000 jobs were lost. Yes, I said lost.

Holy freaking batman! What is happening? It means grandma and grandpa are desperate and willing to take grandson’s low wage job to survive until Social Security kicks in. The U.S. workforce is now the oldest in history. And if grandpa has to work (out of desperation) until the day he dies, there will never be any decent jobs for the grandkids.

This isn’t good news. It’s a disaster.

But I’ve saved the worst news for last. What good is the news of 248,000 new jobs if they are all part-time or low-wage jobs? Four of the five new jobs were in the lowest quality categories.

Obama is creating a nation of desperate, government-dependent minimum wage workers. If you lose your $100,000 job, get ready to clean toilets, flip burgers, mow lawns, or work at The Gap. Because that’s all that’s available among the new jobs.

Welcome to Obama’s America where up is down; where bad news is reported as good news; where old is the new young (because only old people work anymore); where minimum wage is this president’s obsession because minimum wage jobs are the centerpiece of the Obama economy.

This, folks, is an unmitigated disaster. This is the murder of the middle class.

And…

This jobs report is pure fraud.


http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/the-new-jobs-report-is-pure-fraud/

Bump

And Glen Beck is a true economics guru......

More than anyone here ....

Name one thing that isn't true on that post....

You can't say any of what he has said is untrue.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:And Glen Beck is a true economics guru......  

Mr. Glenn Beck has forecast many of the economic disasters in past years.

However, please show us where he authored this notion of yours.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

PACEDOG#1 wrote:You can't say any of what he has said is untrue.

...Obama is creating a nation of desperate, government-dependent minimum wage workers. If you lose your $100,000 job, get ready to clean toilets, flip burgers, mow lawns, or work at The Gap. Because that’s all that’s available among the new jobs....


Why don't you prove that this is true, and provide real-life examples. Can you find a former $100,000 salary person who now has been relegated to cleaning toilets, etc.? Show us that Mr. Beck knows what he is talking about.

As you know, Mr. Beck is not the author of the article. I would think that someone as astute and thorough as you would be more careful.

From the article, which you examined thoroughly.

"The bad news is coming in waves. The only people being hired are your grandparents. 230,000 of the new jobs went to those in the 55 to 69 year old age group. In the prime working age group of 24 to 54 years old, 10,000 jobs were lost. Yes, I said lost."

ZVUGKTUBM, surly you're better than this.

pure idiocy......simpletons trying to explain economic conditions. How many times does the drop in participation rate have to be explained? The funny thing is our John K Gailbraiths are unable to even understand the contradiction contained in the article which makes it utter foolishness.......but carry on explaining away constant statistics which have been used for twenty years and show continuous and historic economic growth and drop in unemployment. Children.

When they cut and paste.....they do not even understand what they have done......hilarious is an understatement. The mid terms should have been a historic sweep for the Republicans. Everybody predicted the same a year ago. However, if Obamacare is no longer a negative, and the economy is continuing historic trends.......what is left but hoping the American public is utterly stupid......the polls are suggesting folks are getting smarter.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:You wingnuts want the economy to fail badly just to prove your political points. What you need to prove is that a Republican-controlled government would make things so much better than they are now.

No one WANTS the economy, I just don't want a Socialist Economy to succeed and it is proving to be a massive failure. As was forecast.

To improve the economy, one would simply have to do nothing.

2seaoat wrote:pure idiocy......simpletons trying to explain economic conditions.  How many times does the drop in participation rate have to be explained?  The funny thing is our John K Gailbraiths are unable to even understand the contradiction contained in the article which makes it utter foolishness.......but carry on explaining away constant statistics which have been used for twenty years and show continuous and historic economic growth and drop in unemployment.   Children.  

How is the economy doing better with fewer people than ever working and the average income of the worker dropping like a rock? Then more people on welfare, more below the poverty line and on, and on, and on.

Children

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:You wingnuts want the economy to fail badly just to prove your political points. What you need to prove is that a Republican-controlled government would make things so much better than they are now.

Why? Proof that the Dems could do better was not required....just some chinzy slogan of HOPEY CHANGEY. No Hope and all we have is change left in our pockets.

We already know that the jobs Obama's minions are reporting on pay on average 23% less than before the 2008-9 crash. We already know that they are mostly PT jobs, especially with the advent of Obamacare. What else more is their to prove to you? All that has been posted here before, but you choose to ignore it.

Facts ..... You hate facts and have yet to disprove one.

Near record successive months of GDP growth and dropping unemployment.......Fact. You are either playing in the ball game or picking flowers in the outfield telling us how many petals are on the flowers. One is relevant......one is not.

ZVUGKTUBM wrote:

PACEDOG#1 wrote:Facts ..... You hate facts and have yet to disprove one.

Where have you ever proven any of the "facts" you come up with?

Like your "fact" from the other day: "...He [Obama] sure wasn't born in the United States..." Let's see you prove that without resorting to some obscure wingnut news site you like to read from.

Yep, if it's from a website you disagree with of course it has to be wrong.....