Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Starbucks Visits the Wall Street Journal

3 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Guest


Guest

While visiting the offices of the WSJ to explain Sbux' plan to pay for college tuition for its employees, Howard Schultz, president, complains that Starbucks is hindered from making more US investments.

Seems that the US is one of only six govts that tax corporate profits on worldwide sales.  So, to avoid that 35% tax Sbux keeps $1.1B of its $1.9B cash  outside the US.  Schultz said Sbux would invest more in the US if the tax rate were reduced.

Listening Congress?

stormwatch89

stormwatch89

Starbucks is far from the only one and NO, congress won't listen.

The progressives believing Corporations to be evil want them taxed even more heavily and then shriek like stuck pigs when they move to more tax favored countries.

Go figure.

stormwatch89

stormwatch89

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-08/offshore-cash-hoard-expands-by-183-billion-at-companies.html


 

The largest U.S.-based companies expanded their untaxed offshore stockpiles by $183 billion in the past year, increasing such holdings by 14.4 percent, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), Apple Inc (AAPL). and Google Inc (GOOG). each added to their non-U.S. holdings by more than 34 percent as they reaped the benefits of past maneuvers to earn and park profits in low- tax countries. Combined, those three companies alone plan to keep $134.5 billion outside the U.S. government’s reach, more than double the $59.3 billion they held two years earlier.

The build-up of offshore profits -- totaling $1.46 trillion for the 83 companies examined -- is increasing because of incentives in the U.S. tax code for booking profits offshore and leaving them there. The stockpiles complicate attempts to overhaul the tax system as lawmakers look for ways to bring the money home and discourage profit shifting.

“The corporate system is broken and it’s broken primarily because of international,” said Edward Kleinbard, a tax law professor at the University of Southern California.

The ability to defer U.S. taxes until profits are brought home, the ease of shifting profits to low-tax countries and the world’s highest statutory corporate rate have all contributed to the growing stockpiles outside the U.S.

A report last year by analysts at JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM). estimated that all U.S.-based companies had $1.7 trillion in accumulated offshore profits. In the data compiled by Bloomberg, 83 companies had about 75 percent of last year’s total, which suggests that the total for all companies now exceeds $1.9 trillion.
$108 Billion

General Electric Co (GE). again leads all U.S. companies with $108 billion held offshore, up from $102 billion a year earlier. Pfizer Inc. is second with $73 billion, followed by Microsoft, Merck & Co., Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) and International Business Machines Corp. The data comes from companies’ annual regulatory filings.

Eleven companies, including Apple, Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO) and Citigroup Inc., have at least $40 billion in profits reinvested overseas, up from six companies that had crossed that mark last year and three the year before that.

The data compiled by Bloomberg examined 83 U.S.-based companies that each reported holding more than $4 billion in earnings outside the country indefinitely in one of the past two years.

Guest


Guest

The irony being of course... that a corp tax is really just a consumption tax... which the leftists would hate because that hurts the middle class, working poor, and welfare recipients the most. I wonder how we lost the ability to objectively see results? The only thing I can come up with is that it's been educated out... literally erasing a human nature.

stormwatch89

stormwatch89

PkrBum wrote:The irony being of course... that a corp tax is really just a consumption tax... which the leftists would hate because that hurts the middle class, working poor, and welfare recipients the most. I wonder how we lost the ability to objectively see results? The only thing I can come up with is that it's been educated out... literally erasing a human nature.

Yup.

boards of FL

boards of FL

I think the reason Starbucks isn't investing more in the US is because they are already located on virtually every street corner in every city. Often times one can look around and see multiple Starbucks within walking distance. In fact, a Starbucks just opened up underneath my desk at work last week, with four more scheduled to break ground in the parking lot. Then there were already the locations next to the fax machine and the one in my filing cabinet.

Market saturation comes to mind.


_________________
I approve this message.

boards of FL

boards of FL

PkrBum wrote:The irony being of course... that a corp tax is really just a consumption tax...


You should really think about publishing your own dictionary.  It would certainly make your posts easier to read given that fact that most words do not actually mean what you think they mean.


_________________
I approve this message.

Guest


Guest

boards of FL wrote:
PkrBum wrote:The irony being of course... that a corp tax is really just a consumption tax...


You should really think about publishing your own dictionary.  It would certainly make your posts easier to read given that fact that most words do not actually mean what you think they mean.

Thank you for illustrating my point. Have you ever owned/run a business? A corp tax is simply a cost to be calculated.

How do you suppose costs are recovered or compensated for? Where does that money come from? Please use little words for me.

Thanks

boards of FL

boards of FL

PkrBum wrote:Thank you for illustrating my point. Have you ever owned/run a business? A corp tax is simply a cost to be calculated.

How do you suppose costs are recovered or compensated for? Where does that money come from? Please use little words for me.

Thanks


Ho...ly...shit...


_________________
I approve this message.

Joanimaroni

Joanimaroni

boards of FL wrote:I think the reason Starbucks isn't investing more in the US is because they are already located on virtually every street corner in every city.  Often times one can look around and see multiple Starbucks within walking distance.  In fact, a Starbucks just opened up underneath my desk at work last week, with four more scheduled to break ground in the parking lot.  Then there were already the locations next to the fax machine and the one in my filing cabinet.  

Market saturation comes to mind.

Now that was funny! I hope you like Starbucks.

stormwatch89

stormwatch89

GE, Apple, Cisco, Citigroup, Google, etc?

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum