Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

The FACTS about 2seaoats so called 13 Benghazi attacks. PROVING AGAIN that Progressives should check the FACTS before posting.

+2
Nekochan
Markle
6 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Markle

Markle

The FACTS about 2seaoats, so called 13 Benghazi attacks.  Not a single American Ambassador killed ALONG with the actions taken by the administration of PRESIDENT GEORGE WALKER BUSH AND news releases from who?  Why FOX NEWS.

NONE were blamed on a phony movie, blame was placed where it belonged on Al-QAEDA who we were attacking AND whom President Barack Hussein Obama said were beaten, on their heels and on the run just before the REAL Benghazi.

From my good friend 2seaoats, although he posted, AGAIN, shall we say...misinformation.


January 22, 2002. Calcutta, India. Gunmen associated with Harkat-ul-Jihad al-Islami attack the U.S. Consulate. Five people are killed.
Facts:  Four police constables and a private security guard were killed and 20 other people injured when, on January 22, 2002, Islamic militants attacked an American cultural centre in Kolkata, India. The centre houses a library, the American embassy's public affairs office, a press section and a cultural wing.[1]

June 14, 2002. Karachi, Pakistan. Suicide bomber connected with al Qaeda attacks the U.S. Consulate, killing 12 and injuring 51.
June 2002 attack
FACTS: On the morning of June 14, 2002, a truck with a fertilizer bomb driven by a suicide bomber was detonated outside the United States Consulate in Karachi, Pakistan. Twelve people were killed and 51 injured, all Pakistanis

October 12, 2002. Denpasar, Indonesia.
U.S. diplomatic offices bombed as part of a string of "Bali Bombings." No fatalities.
FACTS: The writer of this fraction of the occurances of Oct. 12, 2002 missed this detail:  The 2002 Bali bombings occurred on 12 October 2002 in the tourist district of Kuta on the Indonesian island of Bali. The attack killed 202 people (including 88 Australians, 38 Indonesians, 27 Britons, 7 Americans, 6 Swedish citizens and 3 Danish citizens).[3] A further 240 people were injured.
Footnote:  From FOX NEWS: Three Executed in Indonesia for 2002 Bali Bombings
Published November 08, 2008
Associated Press
Three Islamic militants were executed Saturday for the 2002 nightclub bombings on Indonesia's resort island of Bali that left 202 people dead, many of them foreign tourists, officials and relatives said.

Imam Samudra, Amrozi Nurhasyim and his brother Ali Ghufron were executed at 11:30 p.m. several miles (kilometers) from their high security prison on Nusakambangan island, said Qadar Faisal, one of their lawyers.  Read more:  http://www.foxnews.com/story/2008/11/08/three-executed-in-indonesia-for-2002-bali-bombings/

February 28, 2003. Islamabad, Pakistan.
Several gunmen fire upon the U.S. Embassy. Two people are killed.
Facts:  February 2003 shooting
On February 28, 2003, gunmen killed two police officers and wounded five other officers and a civilian in front of the consulate. The attack was conducted from motorcycles, and was deliberately aimed at the paramilitary rangers who have taken over guard duties at the consulate from the Pakistani police

May 12, 2003. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Armed al Qaeda terrorists storm the diplomatic compound, killing 36 people including nine Americans. The assailants committed suicide by detonating a truck bomb.

Late on 12 May, several vehicles containing heavily armed assault teams arrived at three Riyadh compounds: The Dorrat Al Jadawel, a compound owned by the London-based MBI International and Partners subsidiary Jadawel International, the Al Hamra Oasis Village, and the Vinnell Corporation Compound, a compound occupied by a Virginia-based defense contractor that was training the Saudi National Guard. All contained large numbers of Americans, Westerners, and non-Saudi Arabs.

Around 11:15 pm, several gunmen infiltrated the Al Hamra Oasis Village, a compound inhabited mainly by Westerners. They killed the guards at the gate and then opened fire at residents, killing both Westerners and Saudis and then detonated a car bomb. The next compound attacked was the Jadawel compound, though the assailants did not manage to get in the compound. They detonated a truck bomb outside the compound and killed themselves.

The final target was the Vinnell compound. The terrorists shot the Saudi soldiers guarding the compound and then detonated a truck bomb in front of a residential high-rise. Gunmen also fired at residents inside the compound.

The then US President George W. Bush was informed of the attacks while on a national trip, and called them "ruthless murder". Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah condemned the attacks as the work of "monsters" and vowed to destroy the terrorist group that ordered them. After the attacks, Saudi Arabia began a harsh crackdown on the insurgency, arresting more than 600 terrorist suspects and seizing bomb-making materials, bomb belts, and thousands of weapons.

On 7 June 2003, an official Saudi statement identified twelve men as the perpetrators of this attack. According to that statement, the identification was based on DNA found at the scene. The names were Al-Qaeda member Khaled Muhammad bin Muslim Al-Arawi Al-Juhani, Muhammed Othman Abdullah Al-Walidi Al-Shehri, Hani Saeed Ahmad Al Abdul-Karim Al-Ghamdi, Jubran Ali Ahmad Hakami Khabrani, Khaled bin Ibrahim Mahmoud, Mehmas bin Muhammed Mehmas Al-Hawashleh Al-Dosari, Muhammed bin Shadhaf Ali Al-Mahzoum Al-Shehri, Hazem Muhammed Saeed Kashmiri, Majed Abdullah Sa'ad bin Okail, Bandar bin Abdul-Rahman Menawer Al-Rahimi Al-Mutairi, Abdul-Karim Muhammed Jubran Yazji, and Abdullah Farres bin Jufain Al-Rahimi Al-Mutairi.

Abdul Rahman Jabarah was killed in a gunfight with Saudi security forces, believed to have been involved in the attack, as was Zubayr Al-Rimi.

There was one more large-scale attack in Saudi Arabia in 2003. On 8 November, on the day the US State Department warned of further attacks in that country, a suicide truck bomb detonated outside the Al-Mohaya housing compound in Laban Valley, West of Riyadh, killing at least 17 people and wounding 122. Those killed in the attack were all Arabs, many of them workers from countries such as Egypt and Lebanon. Among the injured were people from India, Bangladesh, Philippines, and Eritrea.

Saif al-Adel and Saad Bin Laden are believed to have ordered the attacks. However, according to Saad's family and an interrogation of al-Qaeda spokesman Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, Saad and al-Adel were in Iranian custody at the time of the bombing. Saad was killed in a drone strike in Pakistan in 2009

July 30, 2004. Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
A suicide bomber from the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan attacks the U.S. Embassy, killing two people.
FACTS Embassy bombings
On July 30, 2004, suicide bombers struck the entrances of the US and Israeli embassies in Tashkent. Two Uzbek security guards were killed in both bombings. The IJU again claimed responsibility.

Foreign commentators on Uzbek affairs speculated that the 2004 violence could have been the work of the IMU, Al-Qaeda, Hizb ut-Tahrir, or some other radical Islamic organization

December 6, 2004. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Al Qaeda terrorists storm the U.S. Consulate and occupy the perimeter wall. Nine people are killed.
FACTS: From FOX NEWS  The Mideast
Saudi Arabia begins trial of men charged in 2004 US Consulate attack
Published March 04, 2012
Associated Press
RIYADH, Saudi Arabia –  Saudi Arabia has begun trials of 55 suspected Al Qaeda members, some charged in a deadly attack on a U.S. Consulate in 2004, the kingdom's official news agency reported Sunday.

The Saudi Interior Ministry said eight people were killed in the 2004 storming of the consulate in the port city of Jeddah, including three militants and five citizens of Arab countries who worked at the consulate. A fourth militant died later.

In the brazen attack on Dec. 6, 2004, militants lobbed grenades at the heavily guarded consulate, attacking staffers and holding some hostage in the compound before Saudi security forces stormed in.

March 2, 2006. Karachi, Pakistan again. Suicide bomber attacks the U.S. Consulate killing four people, including U.S. diplomat David Foy who was directly targeted by the attackers. (I wonder if Lindsey Graham or Fox News would even recognize the name "David Foy." This is the third Karachi terrorist attack in four years on what's considered American soil.)
FACTS:  RIYADH, Saudi Arabia –  Saudi Arabia has begun trials of 55 suspected Al Qaeda members, some charged in a deadly attack on a U.S. Consulate in 2004, the kingdom's official news agency reported Sunday.

The Saudi Interior Ministry said eight people were killed in the 2004 storming of the consulate in the port city of Jeddah, including three militants and five citizens of Arab countries who worked at the consulate. A fourth militant died later.

In the brazen attack on Dec. 6, 2004, militants lobbed grenades at the heavily guarded consulate, attacking staffers and holding some hostage in the compound before Saudi security forces stormed in.


September 12, 2006. Damascus, Syria. Four armed gunmen shouting "Allahu akbar" storm the U.S. Embassy using grenades, automatic weapons, a car bomb and a truck bomb. Four people are killed, 13 are wounded.
FACTS: September 12: Three gunmen and a Syrian security guard were killed in a foiled attack on the U.S. embassy. Gunmen tossed grenades over the perimeter walls before opening fire with automatic weapons. A car bomb was detonated outside the embassy, although a truck bomb filled with pipe bombs and gas cylinders failed to explode.

Thirteen people were wounded, including two security guards and a Chinese diplomat. Police also captured one gunman, although he later died of his wounds. The Syrian government said the attack was planned in Saudi Arabia and the attackers had no links to al-Qaeda

January 12, 2007. Athens, Greece. Members of a Greek terrorist group called the Revolutionary Struggle fire a rocket-propelled grenade at the U.S. Embassy. No fatalities.
FACTS:  
2007 United States embassy attack
Location Athens, Greece
Date January 12, 2007
5:58am (UTC+2)
Target Embassy of the United States in Athens
Attack type Rocket propelled grenade
Deaths No fatalities
Non-fatal injuries No injuries


March 18, 2008. Sana'a, Yemen. Members of the al-Qaeda-linked Islamic Jihad of Yemen fire a mortar at the U.S. Embassy. The shot misses the embassy, but hits nearby school killing two.
FACTS The attack began at 09:15 a.m. local time (06:15 a.m. UTC) when attackers dressed as policemen, armed with rocket-propelled grenades, automatic rifles, grenades, and car bombs, attacked the outer security ring at the entrance of the main gate from a car.

Though no Americans working at the embassy were injured or harmed during the attack, Susan el-Baneh, a newly married woman from New York, was killed along with her Yemeni husband while waiting outside to fill out paperwork.

It released a statement: "We will carry out the rest of the series of attacks on the other embassies that were declared previously, until our demands are met by the Yemeni government." Meanwhile, on September 18, 2008, Yemeni authorities arrested 30 suspect.  Allegedly connected to Al-Qaeda.

July 9, 2008. Istanbul, Turkey. Four armed terrorists attack the U.S. Consulate. Six people are killed.

FACTS:  
The attack
All three of the attackers were Turkish nationals, and ethnic Kurds. Armed with pistols and shotguns, the attackers arrived in a car and then got out. One of them quickly opened fire near the main entrance to the compound.

Footage from a security camera at the site showed, as the shootout was unfolding, three armed and bearded men emerging from a Ford Focus being used as an unlicensed taxicab, killing a traffic policeman, then running toward a guard post some 50 yards away as other policemen fired back. The vehicle left the scene, but its driver later turned himself in to the authorities; he had no prior connection to the attackers. There were no casualties in the attack apart from the three attackers and three police officers.  Suspected perpetrators:  Al-Qaeda alleged

September 17, 2008. Sana'a, Yemen. Terrorists dressed as military officials attack the U.S. Embassy with an arsenal of weapons including RPGs and detonate two car bombs. Sixteen people are killed, including an American student and her husband (they had been married for three weeks when the attack occurred). This is the second attack on this embassy in seven months.
FACTS: The 2008 American Embassy attack in Yemen in Sana'a, Yemen on September 17, 2008, resulted in 18 deaths[2] and 16 injuries.  Six attackers, six Yemeni police, and six civilians were killed. This attack was the second occurring in the same year, after a mortar attack earlier in 2008 on March 18 missed the embassy and instead hit a nearby girls' school.[5] Islamic Jihad of Yemen, an al Qaeda affiliate, claimed responsibility for the attack.

The Islamic Jihad of Yemen, an al Qaeda affiliate, has claimed responsibility for the attacks.  The group also threatened future attacks against other embassies, including those of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and the United Kingdom.

It released a statement: "We will carry out the rest of the series of attacks on the other embassies that were declared previously, until our demands are met by the Yemeni government." Meanwhile, on September 18, 2008, Yemeni authorities arrested 30 suspects allegedly connected to Al-Qaeda

2013-05-09-benghazi_gate_bush_era_320.jpg  A few observations about this timeline. My initial list was quoted from an article on the Daily Kos which actually contained several errors and only 11 attacks (the above timeline contains all 13 attacks). Also, my list above doesn't include the numerous and fatal attacks on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad during the Iraq war -- a war that was vocally supported by Lindsey Graham, John McCain and Fox News Channel.

Was it NOT Democrats who also voted for the actions taken by the United Nations and the United States and their coalition?

Who knew, Democrats voted for the same actions and had said for many years that Saddam Hussein had to be removed from office.

Guest


Guest

Seagoat is just a sickening apologist... there's no compunction to twisting or completely revising events for political cover.

If that doesn't work he always has the tattered race card... with no regard to the harm that causes a noble cause.

Nekochan

Nekochan

Bush never declared that the war on terrorism was winding down, the way Obama did.

Markle

Markle

From ZVUGKTUBM eager to see the TRUTH posted!

We'll just keep bumping this thread up   Razz[/quote]

Guest


Guest

Nekochan wrote:Bush never declared that the war on terrorism was winding down, the way Obama did.

Exactly.....and "Al Qaeda was on the run" according to Obama weeks before....

Guest


Guest

ZVUG and others hate facts and Seaoat is so far in with the liberals he cannot be swayed.

2seaoat



You guys are entertaining and so easy......nothing in your facts was different than what I posted........nothing. These 13 attacks happened.......there was no investigation and some locations were multiple attacks as security was lax, and Americans died......I note you cleverly ignore that FACT in your facts....why was that? Why would you not talk about dead Americans....why would Mr. Markle not research the dead body photos and post the same......why would Mr. Markle not ask for a special committee to investigate the same

The simple truth is there was no investigation of the warnings given to the Bush administration about the multitude of warnings of an imminent attack on America.........nothing.....and why, because it would be a political response when folks had died.......leveraging political gain on dead Americans......

Oh, and by the way......those folks that for years were unable to exact a response on those planning and executing terror attacks now face a President who kills them rather than Americans. When I hear Benghazi, I can only think of one word in response.....Iraq.....five trillion of our treasury and 10s of thousands of Americans wounded and killed and hundreds killed by friendly fire and complete screw ups.......and where were the investigations.....where was the review of the yellow cake lies, or the disgraceful presentations before the UN under the Bush Administration lies.......yet where were the hundreds of hours of investigations? There were radical democrats who wanted the same, but leadership understood there were more important things, and that was a mistake......after all political manipulation and scapegoating has become the new Congressional past time. Shameful

Guest


Guest

The simple truth. Is the Obama is busted and you still make excuses for him. He is the worst PoTuS ever in all aspects of the job.

2seaoat



Exactly.....and "Al Qaeda was on the run" according to Obama weeks before....


Ok, I will bite.....please tell me the Al Qaeda connection with the tribal groups who lead the coordinated attack. Not so easy is it to state falsehoods when the planned attack was largely not directly tied to Al Qaeda, but keep up with certainly were only remote and secondary connections.

The Times' article, which includes interviews with several Libyan militia leaders who helped bring down Col. Moammar Gadhafi's dictatorship in 2012, says no evidence supports speculation about al Qaeda's involvement in the Benghazi attack. To the contrary, the Times reports that the diverse and fractured opposition militias, many of whom were at least somewhat friendly toward U.S. interests, most likely contributed to the attack.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

2seaoat wrote:You guys are entertaining and so easy......nothing in your facts was different than what I posted........nothing.   These 13 attacks happened.......there was no investigation and some locations were multiple attacks as security was lax, and Americans died......I note you cleverly ignore that FACT in your facts....why was that?  Why would you not talk about dead Americans....why would Mr. Markle not research the dead body photos and post the same......why would Mr. Markle not ask for a special committee to investigate the same

The simple truth is there was no investigation of the warnings given to the Bush administration about the multitude of warnings of an imminent attack on America.........nothing.....and why, because it would be a political response when folks had died.......leveraging political gain on dead Americans......

Oh, and by the way......those folks that for years were unable to exact a response on those planning and executing terror attacks now face a President who kills them rather than Americans.   When I hear Benghazi, I can only think of one word in response.....Iraq.....five trillion of our treasury and 10s of thousands of Americans wounded and killed and hundreds killed by friendly fire and complete screw ups.......and where were the investigations.....where was the review of the yellow cake lies, or the disgraceful presentations before the UN under the Bush Administration lies.......yet where were the hundreds of hours of investigations?  There were radical democrats who wanted the same, but leadership understood there were more important things, and that was a mistake......after all political manipulation and scapegoating has become the new Congressional past time.  Shameful

Excellent explanation.....

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:You guys are entertaining and so easy......nothing in your facts was different than what I posted........nothing.   These 13 attacks happened.......there was no investigation and some locations were multiple attacks as security was lax, and Americans died......I note you cleverly ignore that FACT in your facts....why was that?  Why would you not talk about dead Americans....why would Mr. Markle not research the dead body photos and post the same......why would Mr. Markle not ask for a special committee to investigate the same

The simple truth is there was no investigation of the warnings given to the Bush administration about the multitude of warnings of an imminent attack on America.........nothing.....and why, because it would be a political response when folks had died.......leveraging political gain on dead Americans......

I realize that you fully intend to ignore the FACTS of these 13 incidents. That is certainly your prerogative. With Progressives and Democrats, ignorance is bliss.

Come one 2seaoat, show us the photos of the Ambassadors killed in those attacks.


Oh, and by the way......those folks that for years were unable to exact a response on those planning and executing terror attacks now face a President who kills them rather than Americans.   When I hear Benghazi, I can only think of one word in response.....Iraq.....five trillion of our treasury and 10s of thousands of Americans wounded and killed and hundreds killed by friendly fire and complete screw ups.......and where were the investigations.....where was the review of the yellow cake lies, or the disgraceful presentations before the UN under the Bush Administration lies.......yet where were the hundreds of hours of investigations?  There were radical democrats who wanted the same, but leadership understood there were more important things, and that was a mistake......after all political manipulation and scapegoating has become the new Congressional past time.  Shameful

othershoe1030

othershoe1030

.after all political manipulation and scapegoating has become the new Congressional past time.  Shameful

The Republicans have this trumped up hysteria about Benghazi going on, this political theater, because repeal of Obamacare has run its course. So what is the GOP left with but to pivot to another issue they can use to distract from the fact that they are getting next to nothing done in congress?

Other than slashing programs for people in need and trying to get the oil pipeline run across the country, what do they stand for? What is their platform? What are their hopes for this great country?

So far all I see is their war on women and the poor, war on Obamacare, war on science and war on gun safety laws. Continuing to beat the Benghazi drum is getting to be about as mind numbing as seeing another report on CNN about the lost flight over the ocean.  

Guest


Guest

It's obviously very irritating to obama and his devout followers that there is accountability and oversite of his policies.

Perhaps the next time one party has complete control... checks and balances can be done away with. Yea team..!!

2seaoat



Checks and balances.......an active CIA operation which now is becoming totally compromised because of a political play which you try to rationalize as check and balances when it is nothing more than some fully knowing that discretion will be interpreted as cover up, all the while four dead Americans are used to fund raise.........I will say it again.......four dead Americans being used to fund raise. This has nothing to do with legitimacy. This is the putrid belly of an Oligarchy desperate to destroy government and regulation as they face certain taxation, regulation, and contribution in the future, and they want some more of America wrapped up with a ribbon on it.......fund raising off dead Americans and you want to talk your nonsense about Obama supporters.....did not even vote for the man, but I understand the truth.

Guest


Guest

If it was indeed a cia operation that was funneling arms to islamic insurgents... it needs to be compromised and exposed.

Btw... nobody believes that you didn't vote for obama or that you are or ever were a republican... that's absurd comrade.

I used to be a republican... collectivist/statist ideologies don't mesh with any tennant in constitutional conservatism.

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:You guys are entertaining and so easy......nothing in your facts was different than what I posted........nothing.   These 13 attacks happened.......there was no investigation and some locations were multiple attacks as security was lax, and Americans died......I note you cleverly ignore that FACT in your facts....why was that?  Why would you not talk about dead Americans....why would Mr. Markle not research the dead body photos and post the same......why would Mr. Markle not ask for a special committee to investigate the same

The simple truth is there was no investigation of the warnings given to the Bush administration about the multitude of warnings of an imminent attack on America.........nothing.....and why, because it would be a political response when folks had died.......leveraging political gain on dead Americans......

Oh, and by the way......those folks that for years were unable to exact a response on those planning and executing terror attacks now face a President who kills them rather than Americans.   When I hear Benghazi, I can only think of one word in response.....Iraq.....five trillion of our treasury and 10s of thousands of Americans wounded and killed and hundreds killed by friendly fire and complete screw ups.......and where were the investigations.....where was the review of the yellow cake lies, or the disgraceful presentations before the UN under the Bush Administration lies.......yet where were the hundreds of hours of investigations?  There were radical democrats who wanted the same, but leadership understood there were more important things, and that was a mistake......after all political manipulation and scapegoating has become the new Congressional past time.  Shameful

I posted the results of the 13 attacks you listed and the results.

We did not have armed drones at the beginning of the War on Terror.

The FACTS about 2seaoats so called 13 Benghazi attacks.  PROVING AGAIN that Progressives should check the FACTS before posting. CostofWaronTerror5102014_zps0c708bd2

No lies before the UN and, as you know, the administration of President George Walker Bush immediately released the Intelligence Briefings from immediately from after the 9/11/2001 act of war.

That's all President Barack Hussein Obama has to do about Benghazi. Why does he not?

How can you pack so much misinformation into one post? Must take a special skill.

Yellowcake?

updated 7/5/2008 6:57:12 PM ET

The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program — a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium — reached a Canadian port Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.

The removal of 550 metric tons of "yellowcake" — the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment — was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy. It also brought relief to U.S. and Iraqi authorities who had worried the cache would reach insurgents or smugglers crossing to Iran to aid its nuclear ambitions.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/25546334/

2seaoat



Your statistics are completely wrong......tell me about the cost of caring for our veterans over the next fifty years.

Markle

Markle

2seaoat wrote:Your statistics are completely wrong......tell me about the cost of caring for our veterans over the next fifty years.

My statistics are exactly right to the day. How much did the 9/11/2001 Act of War cost us and how many more should we have absorbed before fighting back?

Good to see you understand that this is a MAJOR problem NOT being addressed by President Barack Hussein Obama.

Current Debt . . . $17.6 TRILLION

Unfunded Liabilities (money we have PROMISED, do not have, nor do we have it coming in)

Social Security. . . . $16.6 TRILLION (10,000 Baby Boomers RETIRE EVERY DAY) (How many workers are entering the job market daily?)

Prescription Drugs .$22.0 TRILLION

Medicare. . . . . . . . $87.5 TRILLION

Total Unfunded Liabilities $126.2 TRILLION!


Number of Households in 2010 = 112,611,029

Unfunded Liability Per Taxpayer $1,101,203.00


http://www.usdebtclock.org/index.html

PLUS ObamaCare and Untold TRILLIONS more in TAXES

Wordslinger

Wordslinger

From his obvious concern over the national debt, it's difficult to reconcile Herr Markle's advocacy for giant bloodsucking American corporations with overseas operations to keep and spend their profits there instead of paying taxes here.

Like I said, Markle hates American workers, I hate Amerika Inc.


It's good to know your enemies.

Markle

Markle

Wordslinger wrote:From his obvious concern over the national debt, it's difficult to reconcile Herr Markle's advocacy for giant bloodsucking American corporations with overseas operations to keep and spend their profits there instead of paying taxes here.

Like I said, Markle hates American workers, I hate Amerika Inc.

It's good to know your enemies.

Who hires the American workers and who is benefiting from all those profits staying in other countries rather than paying the highest corporate taxes in the World?

I bet you voluntarily pay an additional 25% of your income to the government to help pay our debt. Right?

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum