The Duck-Mouth violated his contract

Robertson signed a contract with A&E that included a "morals" clause and, he had been warned by the producers for making outlandish social comments several times before A&E lowered the boom. A&E had every right to yank the noisy quacker.

And, of course, as an American, the Quacker had every right to voice his opinion any way he wanted to.

The only channel I can think of that would welcome the Quacker family's distorted reality show would be FOX. Maybe following or leading into Meghan Kelly's show.

Might as well get all the haters on one channel!!

Better to violate an earthly contract with a dying country than an eternal contract with God...so he is bound by a higher purpose..good for him.

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Better to violate an earthly contract with a dying country than an eternal contract with God...so he is bound by a higher purpose..good for him.

Tell me, do you really believe God is straight? LOL

Wordslinger wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Better to violate an earthly contract with a dying country than an eternal contract with God...so he is bound by a higher purpose..good for him.

Tell me, do you really believe God is straight?  LOL

Well do you believe he's bent ?

If he violated his contact... fire him. This ain't rocket psychiatry.

He is laughing all the way to the bank and A &E will not be

PACEDOG#1 wrote:He is laughing all the way to the bank and A &E will not be

They will be if they keep him and the show.  

Duck Dynasty, like most all this "reality" programming,  has relatively low production costs compared to conventional content produced for A&E.
In other words,  it provides them a lot of bang for their buck.
They know that this enormous free publicity will put more eyeballs in front of the tv sets.  And higher ratings with the same production costs means greater ad revenues.  In other words it puts more moolah in their pockets.
The priority for commercial television networks is increasing revenues.  That takes precedence over all the controversy surrounding this.  And when the chips are down,  even if the queers boycott the thing,  queers only make up a little fraction of the audience.  Plenty of advertisers will remain who also want to cash in on the ratings.  The advertisers want to push product.  As long as they have audiences to cater to,  they don't care about the controversy either.  And they know that queers are not who they're targeting with commercials seen on Duck Dynasty.

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Better to violate an earthly contract with a dying country than an eternal contract with God...so he is bound by a higher purpose..good for him.

A dying country? C'mon man, that's utter and complete nonsense and you know it T!

knothead wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:Better to violate an earthly contract with a dying country than an eternal contract with God...so he is bound by a higher purpose..good for him.

A dying country? C'mon man, that's utter and complete nonsense and you know it T!

Everything dies but God's love...

Better to violate an earthly contract with a dying country than an eternal contract with God...so he is bound by a higher purpose..good for him.


Where in the bible does it say T speaks for God? Your perverse ideas are not Christian ideals.

Romans 8:31–34

God’s Everlasting Love

31 What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us?

2seaoat wrote:Better to violate an earthly contract with a dying country than an eternal contract with God...so he is bound by a higher purpose..good for him.


Where in the bible does it say T speaks for God?  Your perverse ideas are not Christian ideals.

Acts 4:19But Peter and John answered them, “Whether it is right in the sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge,

The mooslims are all saying the same thing you do, teo, except they're saying it in Arabic about another god from a different book.

Do Muslims call ducks?

Bob wrote:The mooslims are all saying the same thing you do,  teo,  except they're saying it in Arabic about another god from a different book.

And?

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Bob wrote:The mooslims are all saying the same thing you do,  teo,  except they're saying it in Arabic about another god from a different book.

And?

"And" what? That point stands on it's own. Depending only on the place you happen to be born, you will either spend your life worshipping the god in one book, or you will spend your life worshipping a god in another book.
Or you will worship buddhism or you will worship hinduism or you'll worship that religion or the other religion.
Yes, some minisicule tiny number of people will switch from one religion to another one. But for the masses of people, it all depends on where you happen to be born.
And you're absolutely convinced they're heathens and they're just as absolutely convinced that you're the heathen.
Each mass of people has a different god or a different thing to worship.
All depending on where they happen to be born.

That speaks volumes about the whole thing. It doesn't need any "and".

Bob wrote:

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Bob wrote:The mooslims are all saying the same thing you do,  teo,  except they're saying it in Arabic about another god from a different book.

And?

"And" what?  That point stands on it's own.  Depending only on the place you happen to be born,  you will either spend your life worshipping the god in one book,  or you will spend your life worshipping a god in another book.
Or you will worship buddhism or you will worship hinduism or you'll worship that religion or the other religion.
Yes,  some minisicule tiny number of people will switch from one religion to another one.  But for the masses of people,  it all depends on where you happen to be born.  
And you're absolutely convinced they're heathens and they're just as absolutely convinced that you're the heathen.  
Each mass of people has a different god or a different thing to worship.
All depending on where they happen to be born.

That speaks volumes about the whole thing.  It doesn't need any "and".

Yes it did require an "and" ! I can't read your mind, I can infer what direction you are headed but why should I have to because you are to lazy to "and" for me ?...

There is only one God and his son is Jesus Christ. Anything outside of that is a lie and has caused all the evil in this world.

Sal wrote:T's imaginary friend can beat up their imaginary friend.

Yes he can but I am his imagination just like everything that is...

Acts 17:27 God did this so that they would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from any one of us. 28 ‘For in him we live and move and have our being.’ As some of your own poets have said, ‘We are his offspring.’