Is this cool or what. Nudity is just nudity.

http://daypic.ru/art/143157?fb_action_ids=600866236615421&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map=%5B10151811152845752%5D&action_type_map=%5B%22og.likes%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D

Yikes! It looks like I'm the only one who likes this. Oh well.

Yella wrote:http://daypic.ru/art/143157?fb_action_ids=600866236615421&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map=%5B10151811152845752%5D&action_type_map=%5B%22og.likes%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D

Yikes! It looks like I'm the only one who likes this.  Oh well.

The nudity does not bother me, but I don't think it adds anything either. There are some people in these pictures that I don't want to see naked.  

Yella,

Some of those folks who are participating certainly look under 17 years of age. Be careful where you go........you could turn the forum and its members into criminals if they download your link on their computer. I think the photos are artistic and are not sexual in nature. The problem is that if a person is downloading images of children under the age of 17 they could face legal consequences.

2seaoat wrote:Yella,

Some of those folks who are participating certainly look under 17 years of age.  Be careful where you go........you could turn the forum and its members into criminals if they download your link on their computer.  I think the photos are artistic and are not sexual in nature.   The problem is that if a person is downloading images of children under the age of 17 they could face legal consequences.

I considered it to be artistic expression at base level. Some might see it as porn. It's all in the eye of the beholder.

I considered it to be artistic expression at base level. Some might see it as porn. It's all in the eye of the beholder.

I am sorry to inform you that may not be the law. What happened to Talk was a group of people who were conspired to entrap otherwise law abiding citizens into breaking the law........two or three planted models without the proper age in some states will make somebody a registered sex offender......big brother is alive and well in America. If you think photos of nude children in a state with over broad and dangerous statutes which give too much discretion to folks who sit on task forces looking for raw meat to feed their machinery and funding does not put you in the crosshairs......carry on but I am glad you only gave a link.

2seaoat wrote:I considered it to be artistic expression at base level. Some might see it as porn. It's all in the eye of the beholder.

I am sorry to inform you that may not be the law.  What happened to Talk was a group of people who were conspired to entrap otherwise law abiding citizens into breaking the law........two or three planted models without the proper age in some states will make somebody a registered sex offender......big brother is alive and well in America.  If you think photos of nude children in a state with over broad and dangerous statutes which give too much discretion to folks who sit on task forces looking for raw meat to feed their machinery and funding does not put you in the crosshairs......carry on but I am glad you only gave a link.

Ask your good friend Talkstang, I'm sure he can advise you.

Yella wrote:

2seaoat wrote:Yella,

Some of those folks who are participating certainly look under 17 years of age.  Be careful where you go........you could turn the forum and its members into criminals if they download your link on their computer.  I think the photos are artistic and are not sexual in nature.   The problem is that if a person is downloading images of children under the age of 17 they could face legal consequences.

I considered it to be artistic expression at base level. Some might see it as porn.  It's all in the eye of the beholder.  

I don't consider it art or porn.  I just see it as an obsessed photographer who probably laughs his butt of knowing he has gotten hundreds of people to get naked and stand around together.

2seaoat wrote:I considered it to be artistic expression at base level. Some might see it as porn. It's all in the eye of the beholder.

I am sorry to inform you that may not be the law.  What happened to Talk was a group of people who were conspired to entrap otherwise law abiding citizens into breaking the law........two or three planted models without the proper age in some states will make somebody a registered sex offender......big brother is alive and well in America.  If you think photos of nude children in a state with over broad and dangerous statutes which give too much discretion to folks who sit on task forces looking for raw meat to feed their machinery and funding does not put you in the crosshairs......carry on but I am glad you only gave a link.

Oops too late for you, you already looked LOL

and btw, talknstank didn't just dl porn, he WENT TO TEEN GIRLS HOMES after looking at porn they sent him.