Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

TOP FIVE OBAMACARE CATASTROPHES MEDIA REFUSE TO COVER

+2
cool1
Markle
6 posters

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Markle

Markle

HUGE EMBARRASSMENT FOR PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA


Top Five ObamaCare Catastrophes the Media Refuse to Cover

The media are doing a good job covering the ObamaCare launch problems. But like their coverage of President Obama's disastrous performance in his first presidential debate with Mitt Romney, there is a partisan motive at work here. The media want ObamaCare to succeed and believe that pounding away at the site problems will motivate the White House to get the site fixed.

While the tech problems are real and worth covering, so are five other ObamaCare catastrophes. But the media won't cover those because to do so might further undermine the program:

1. Millions are Losing Their Health Insurance
About 14 million Americans (not enrolled in Medicare or Medicaid) purchase their health insurance privately as opposed to through an employer.

Because a large percentage of these plans do not cover everything ObamaCare mandates a policy cover -- among other things: birth control, mental health, maternity, vision, dental -- these plans are being cancelled --no matter how happy people might be with them. We learned today that in just one state just one provider dropped 300,000 customers.

2. Premium Increases on Working and Middle Class
President Obama hosted a Rose Garden event Monday where he incessantly repeated a talking point about health care now being more affordable. Certainly, for some, it will be, especially those joining the expanded Medicaid rolls.

But for many more millions among the working and middle class, premiums are going up, sometimes by as much as 50% to 150%. We are not talking about taxing the wealthy here, we are talking about everyday people, families, and small businesses.

Keep in mind that all of this is happening to these families in a no-growth economy.

3. Obama's One-Year Delay On Business Mandate Strands the Middle and Working Class

In 2015, and in an anemic job growth-era that is entering year five of creating mostly part-time jobs, ObamaCare will sock small business owners with a massive tax. If a company has more than 50 full-time employees, they are either required to provide them with ObamaCare or pay a fine of $2000 a year per employee.

Why would a small business owner add another full-time employee if it means being socked with the kinds of costs associated with paying for health insurance or paying the fine?

Obviously, these fledgling businesses are going to either hire part-time workers or go to a temp agency.

The most cynical part of this mandate, though, is that this is the employer mandate Obama delayed for a year. But he didn't delay it to help business as much as he did it to increase the number of people who would be forced to enroll for ObamaCare during this crucial first year.

With no carrot or stick, businesses already at or above the 50 employee threshold are a lot less likely to offer their employees health insurance until the mandate kicks in the following year. This leaves who-knows-how-many employees stranded for a year without health insurance and facing a penalty if they don't sign up for ObamaCare.

This was a ruthless move by Obama to artificially bump his all-important first-year numbers by removing the incentive for employers to offer health insurance, which cornered employees into enrolling in ObamaCare.

4. ObamaCare's Effect On the Unemployed and Under-Employed

While it is a sad thing that ObamaCare means that who-knows-how-many small businesses can't expand their workforce in a way that benefits everyone, the real victims are the who-knows-how-many unemployed and under-employed who won't be hired for full-time jobs by these companies.

ObamaCare has been the law of the land for three-plus years , and for just as long our economy has been adding 7 part-time jobs for every full-time job. This can't be a coincidence. As soon as ObamaCare was passed, employers saw the writing on the wall and planned accordingly.

5. The Working Poor are Getting Hammered
The stories of the hundreds of thousands among the working poor losing their employer-based health insurance and having their hours cut, all due to ObamaCare, are everywhere. But the media intentionally refuse to do anything other than dutifully cover these individual stories. Were they to focus on this horrific consequence that is disproportionately affecting the working poor, it would likely turn even more people against ObamaCare -- something the media just aren’t going to allow to happen.
--
While the media's coverage of the rolling disaster that is the ObamaCare launch is both welcome and appropriate, what the media will not cover is what is now and is always going to be the real ObamaCare disaster: the economic chaos ObamaCare is forcing millions upon millions of everyday Americans to needlessly pay for and deal with.

And the people callously being thrown into this maelstrom aren't The Wealthy, aren't Mitt Romney, aren't the Top 1%, aren’t even Tea Partiers -- they are the very people Obama repeatedly promised could keep their insurance and that he would never tax: the working poor and the middle class.


This post has been edited for brevity. Read the entire article at:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/10/21/Top-five-obamacare-catastrophes-media-refuse-to-cover

2TOP FIVE OBAMACARE CATASTROPHES MEDIA REFUSE TO COVER Empty again, I feel compelled.... 10/22/2013, 1:00 pm

Guest


Guest

Markle wrote:HUGE EMBARRASSMENT FOR PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA


Top Five ObamaCare Catastrophes the Media Refuse to Cover

The media are doing a good job covering the ObamaCare launch problems. But like their coverage of President Obama's disastrous performance in his first presidential debate with Mitt Romney, there is a partisan motive at work here. The media want ObamaCare to succeed and believe that pounding away at the site problems  will motivate the White House to get the site fixed.

While the tech problems are real and worth covering, so are five other ObamaCare catastrophes. But the media won't cover those because to do so might further undermine the program:

1. Millions are Losing Their Health Insurance
About 14 million Americans (not enrolled in Medicare or Medicaid) purchase their health insurance privately as opposed to through an employer.

Because a large percentage of these plans do not cover everything ObamaCare mandates a policy cover -- among other things: birth control, mental health, maternity, vision, dental -- these plans are being cancelled --no matter how happy people might be with them. We learned today that in just one state just one provider dropped 300,000 customers.

2. Premium Increases on Working and Middle Class
President Obama hosted a Rose Garden event Monday where he incessantly repeated a talking point about health care now being more affordable. Certainly, for some, it will be, especially those joining the expanded Medicaid rolls.

But for many more millions among the working and middle class, premiums are going up, sometimes by as much as 50% to 150%.  We are not talking about taxing the wealthy here, we are talking about everyday people, families, and small businesses.

Keep in mind that all of this is happening to these families in a no-growth economy.

3. Obama's One-Year Delay On Business Mandate Strands the Middle and Working Class

In 2015,  and in an anemic job growth-era that is entering year five of creating mostly part-time jobs, ObamaCare will sock small business owners with a massive tax. If a company has more than 50 full-time employees, they are either required to provide them with ObamaCare or pay a fine of $2000 a year per employee.

Why would a small business owner add another full-time employee if it means being socked with the kinds of costs associated with paying for health insurance or paying the fine?

Obviously, these fledgling businesses are going to either hire part-time workers or go to a temp agency.

The most cynical part of this mandate, though, is that this is the employer mandate Obama delayed for a year. But he didn't delay it to help business as much as he did it to increase the number of people who would be forced to enroll for ObamaCare during this crucial first year.

With no carrot or stick, businesses already at or above the 50 employee threshold are a lot less likely to offer their employees health insurance until the mandate kicks in the following year. This leaves who-knows-how-many employees stranded for a year without health insurance and facing a penalty if they don't sign up for ObamaCare.

This was a ruthless move by Obama to artificially bump his all-important first-year numbers by removing the incentive for employers to offer health insurance, which cornered employees into enrolling in ObamaCare.

4. ObamaCare's Effect On the Unemployed and Under-Employed

While it is a sad thing that ObamaCare means that who-knows-how-many small businesses can't expand their workforce in a way that benefits everyone, the real victims are the who-knows-how-many unemployed and under-employed who won't be hired for full-time jobs by these companies.

ObamaCare has been the law of the land for three-plus years , and for just as long our economy has been adding 7 part-time jobs for every full-time job. This can't be a coincidence.  As soon as ObamaCare was passed, employers saw the writing on the wall and planned accordingly.

5. The Working Poor are Getting Hammered
The stories of the hundreds of thousands among the working poor losing their employer-based health insurance and having their hours cut, all due to ObamaCare, are everywhere. But the media intentionally refuse to do anything other than dutifully cover these individual stories. Were they to focus on this horrific consequence that is disproportionately affecting the working poor, it would likely turn even more people against ObamaCare -- something the media just aren’t going to allow to happen.
--
While the media's coverage of the rolling disaster that is the ObamaCare launch is both welcome and appropriate, what the media will not cover is what is now and is always going to be the real ObamaCare disaster: the economic chaos ObamaCare is forcing millions upon millions of everyday Americans to needlessly pay for and deal with.

And the people callously being thrown into this maelstrom aren't The Wealthy, aren't Mitt Romney, aren't the Top 1%, aren’t even Tea Partiers -- they are the very people Obama repeatedly promised could keep their insurance and that he would never tax: the working poor and the middle class.


This post has been edited for brevity.  Read the entire article at:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/10/21/Top-five-obamacare-catastrophes-media-refuse-to-cover
I really feel bad for pee-dog and Mr. Markle when they work so hard making up lie after lie about this law, work to type it in, and then nobody replies to it. Sad, and pathetic.

Reminder for readers: Pee-dog and Mr. Markle, among other incessantly argue to keep all Americans from seeing a doctor on a regular basis in order to live healthier lives and therefore reducing future healthcare costs.
They also argue to keep giving away free healthcare.
Recap:
food stamps-0.52% of economy--OH, NO!! NO FOOD FOR HUNGRY, POOR PEOPLE!!!
Healthcare-17.5% of economy--OH, YEA. GO AHEAD, GIVE IT AWAY.


Thanks for taking time to read my posts.

cool1

cool1

PACEDOG#1 wrote:TOP FIVE OBAMACARE CATASTROPHES MEDIA REFUSE TO COVER 1375684_638219456209612_850832829_n



So true ---Why didn't they call them in at the beginning Mad

Markle

Markle

Typical, none of our Progressive good friends even make an attempt to dispute any of the facts I posted.

7TOP FIVE OBAMACARE CATASTROPHES MEDIA REFUSE TO COVER Empty You can read, obviously 10/26/2013, 9:29 am

Guest


Guest

Markle wrote:Typical, none of our Progressive good friends even make an attempt to dispute any of the facts I posted.
I replied to your pack of lies calling them what they are, lies designed to intimidate and frighten.
Thanks for reading.

ZVUGKTUBM

ZVUGKTUBM

CarlSagan wrote:
Markle wrote:Typical, none of our Progressive good friends even make an attempt to dispute any of the facts I posted.
I replied to your pack of lies calling them what they are, lies designed to intimidate and frighten.
Thanks for reading.
Markle is quite opinionated.... So much so, he is absolutely convinced his opinions count as "facts."

http://www.best-electric-barbecue-grills.com

2seaoat



I think there is some truth in each of Mr. Markles posts. However, competition will lower rates over time. If you were a CEO of an insurance company, would not your natural instinct over the last five years be to raise rates when there is little or no regulation over administrative profits? Now with the act in place those double digit rate increases are going to slowly reverse and with competition you will see rates drop. I think people need to be patient.

Guest


Guest

2seaoat wrote:I think there is some truth in each of Mr. Markles posts. However, competition will lower rates over time. If you were a CEO of an insurance company, would not your natural instinct over the last five years be to raise rates when there is little or no regulation over administrative profits? Now with the act in place those double digit rate increases are going to slowly reverse and with competition you will see rates drop. I think people need to be patient.
Competition is exactly what was slowly but surely squeezed out of healthcare... I've posted lists of govt legislation.

This collusion between the major corps and govt is the problem... not the solution. Do you try to be perfectly wrong?

2seaoat



If you believe the public option will not be on the transition period of the Affordable Care Act journey to single payer, you might actually believe what you have posted. However, the public option will be the secondary phase of the act, and you will see some of this immediately in States who experiment on the path to single payer. Perfectly wrong requires familiarity.

Guest


Guest

There are not 32,000 pages to promote competition... lol.

This will be pretty easily measured. Will there be more insurance companies... or less. Will there be more privately owned/run hospitals... or fewer w growing major corps? Will there be more private practices and providers... or fewer and w growing major corps?

You really should give these things a little thght before you spew a bunch of bs.

Markle

Markle

CarlSagan wrote:
Markle wrote:Typical, none of our Progressive good friends even make an attempt to dispute any of the facts I posted.
I replied to your pack of lies calling them what they are, lies designed to intimidate and frighten.
Thanks for reading.
As you know, calling something a lie doesn't make it a lie. You have to back up your allegation. You, of course, can not.


dumpcare



http://finance.yahoo.com/news/does-the-obamacare-penalty-actually-have-teeth--144740030.html

dumpcare



There will not be competition to lower rates, this will only put the smaller insurer's out of business and you will have blue, uhc, humana, aetna and cigna left. The 5 will be able to dictate the rates. They will count their MLR's in the rate increases. But the government wants them to all go out of business and a single payer.

Nekochan

Nekochan

ppaca wrote:There will not be competition to lower rates, this will only put the smaller insurer's out of business and you will have blue, uhc, humana, aetna and cigna left. The 5 will be able to dictate the rates. They will count their MLR's in the rate increases. But the government wants them to all go out of business and a single payer.
I think you're right.  This was the goal all along.

Guest


Guest

It doesn't matter. They can only use 20% of their profits for admin. costs. The rest have to be returned to the insured if they go over.

dumpcare



It does matter, as provider's demand more from the insurance company's in their yearly contracts the insurer's will be paying out more for your claims and raising your rates. Once they go over that 80% your rebates stop. Who do you think is going to pay for that? The policy holder.

Guest


Guest

Dreamsglore wrote:It doesn't matter. They can only use 20% of their profits for admin. costs. The rest have to be returned to the insured if they go over.
well raise the rates as they are. 20% of 50 billion is better than 20% of 25 billion LOL

Markle

Markle

Dreamsglore wrote:It doesn't matter. They can only use 20% of their profits for admin. costs. The rest have to be returned to the insured if they go over.
Which means less and poorer service for more and more people.

Markle

Markle


They'll have to raise rates and taxes will have to be raised as well. Further slowing the economy.

The people going through the quagmire and boondoggle to sign up for an ObamaCare policy are the most expensive to the insurance companies.

The folks who are young and healthy are looking at the policies they have disappear and are being replaced by policies costing double or more. They don't want it and they can't be forced to buy if they don't want to buy. There is no enforcement.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum