So no one wants to admit nor discuss the disparity between the Libyan event and the original 9/11. How surprising. We've heard nothing but Benghazi since Mitt Romney tried to politicize the tragedy during the election. But anyone who questions 9/11 is automatically a "conspiracy theorist", even though the official version of events is full of errors, omissions, and faulty science.
Now, pay attention:
Until you can bring former president Bush up for trial, which our current president and his past Congressional majority avoided doing by the way, then all you have is a conspiracy theory. Of course to add to that conspiracy there must be a reason that Democratic majority didn't force a trial when they could have... I wonder what that reason is... Could it be that there actually was misleading information that was feed to the White House after 9/11 and that it would implicate some top Democratic figureheads?
On the other hand we have a current president who did knowingly, with the whole world watching, commit war crimes against a sovereign nation that we weren't at war with and without Congressional approval also. Then in turn he failed to withdraw our embassy or provide additional security after his act of aggression and in the end a lot of good men paid the price for his inaction.
To me there's really no comparison except in your deluded mind there darlin'.