BENGHAZI about to HIT THE FAN? CBS NEWS PUMMELS ADMINISTRATION WITH DEVASTATING REPORT

Floridatexan wrote:
So no one wants to admit nor discuss the disparity between the Libyan event and the original 9/11. How surprising. We've heard nothing but Benghazi since Mitt Romney tried to politicize the tragedy during the election. But anyone who questions 9/11 is automatically a "conspiracy theorist", even though the official version of events is full of errors, omissions, and faulty science.

Now, pay attention:

VectorMan wrote:"Stand down order" was issued to Special Forces Team, an hour away from Benghazi, that could have been there before the 2nd attack.

Sal wrote:

VectorMan wrote:"Stand down order" was issued to Special Forces Team, an hour away from Benghazi, that could have been there before the 2nd attack.

Uh huh ...

... and they did that why?

VectorMan wrote:

Who knows?

Maybe Wednesday we'll all find out.

But, to at look Obama's track record of lies, I expect no truth from that idiot's pie hole.

Sal wrote:

VectorMan wrote:

Who knows?

Maybe Wednesday we'll all find out.

But, to at look Obama's track record of lies, I expect no truth from that idiot's pie hole.

You don't have to wait until Wednesday, asshole.

If you didn't rely on the Blaze for your info, you'd already know this ...


U.S. military officials confirmed late Monday that a four-man Special Operations Forces team was denied permission to leave the US Embassy in Tripoli following reports that the consulate in Benghazi had been attacked.

The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the team was reviewing security at U.S. embassies throughout the Middle East and was not prepared for a combat assault mission, being armed with only 9mm sidearms.

They also noted that the situation at Benghazi remained unclear and there were concerns the Embassy in Tripoli also could become a target.

http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/06/18086898-official-us-special-forces-team-wasnt-allowed-to-fly-to-benghazi-during-attack?lite

Don't let facts get in the way of setting your hair on fire tho.

2seaoat wrote:If it leaves Obama's legacy in shambles,

Really......do you lack perception, or are you entirely ignorant that this was an active CIA operation, and since when does a president micro manage CIA operations.......are people getting all up in Arms when the scene depicted in Zero Dark Thirty actually happened and close 20 top intelligence people were killed or wounded.....did this go up to the president......no......this was tactical, and the response was tactical, and sometimes tactical responses may not make sense without understanding exactly how the CIA was deployed and what may have been a higher priority just a few miles away after the initial attack. This idea of a cover up is simply absurd. The president classified it as a terrorist attack in the Rose Garden....I heard him live on TV....If I knew it was a terrorist attack how f'ing stupid would a person have to be.........and to what end is a cover up going to accomplish anything........as I said earlier 7 Americans died this weekend and a couple were killed by Afghans who we trained.....not a word in the press because both sides of the aisles could care less if a few more Americans die....as long as they do not get cast as soft on defense and terrorism......absurd political dialogue.

VectorMan wrote:

2seaoat wrote:If it leaves Obama's legacy in shambles,

Really......do you lack perception, or are you entirely ignorant that this was an active CIA operation, and since when does a president micro manage CIA operations.......are people getting all up in Arms when the scene depicted in Zero Dark Thirty actually happened and close 20 top intelligence people were killed or wounded.....did this go up to the president......no......this was tactical, and the response was tactical, and sometimes tactical responses may not make sense without understanding exactly how the CIA was deployed and what may have been a higher priority just a few miles away after the initial attack. This idea of a cover up is simply absurd. The president classified it as a terrorist attack in the Rose Garden....I heard him live on TV....If I knew it was a terrorist attack how f'ing stupid would a person have to be.........and to what end is a cover up going to accomplish anything........as I said earlier 7 Americans died this weekend and a couple were killed by Afghans who we trained.....not a word in the press because both sides of the aisles could care less if a few more Americans die....as long as they do not get cast as soft on defense and terrorism......absurd political dialogue.

Whatever. It happened on Obama's watch, then add the fact that he's a bald face liar, and it doesn't look good for him. The lying BS gets old quick. Obama's pants are surely on fire.

You switch the R's & D's around in this scandal and you'd see the libs foaming at the mouth for a pound of flesh from a republican president. The liberal media would have a hay day, while going orgasmic at the opportunity to eviscerate a republican.

knothead wrote:The liberal media would have a hay day, while going orgasmic at the opportunity to eviscerate a republican.

********************************************************

Liberal media? All I hear from the right is that CBS is part of the so-called lame stream media and they are the source of this thread, what's up with that?

Billy the Kid wrote:

VectorMan wrote:

2seaoat wrote:If it leaves Obama's legacy in shambles,

Really......do you lack perception, or are you entirely ignorant that this was an active CIA operation, and since when does a president micro manage CIA operations.......are people getting all up in Arms when the scene depicted in Zero Dark Thirty actually happened and close 20 top intelligence people were killed or wounded.....did this go up to the president......no......this was tactical, and the response was tactical, and sometimes tactical responses may not make sense without understanding exactly how the CIA was deployed and what may have been a higher priority just a few miles away after the initial attack. This idea of a cover up is simply absurd. The president classified it as a terrorist attack in the Rose Garden....I heard him live on TV....If I knew it was a terrorist attack how f'ing stupid would a person have to be.........and to what end is a cover up going to accomplish anything........as I said earlier 7 Americans died this weekend and a couple were killed by Afghans who we trained.....not a word in the press because both sides of the aisles could care less if a few more Americans die....as long as they do not get cast as soft on defense and terrorism......absurd political dialogue.

Whatever. It happened on Obama's watch, then add the fact that he's a bald face liar, and it doesn't look good for him. The lying BS gets old quick. Obama's pants are surely on fire.

You switch the R's & D's around in this scandal and you'd see the libs foaming at the mouth for a pound of flesh from a republican president. The liberal media would have a hay day, while going orgasmic at the opportunity to eviscerate a republican.

....................................

Place and time. And don't make it the gay bars you cruise looking for another cock to suck.

2seaoat wrote:I will agree to disagree. This was cia from top to bottom.....the Ambassador was cia........Hillary is not going to take any kind of hit from this event in 2016.....zero. However, over the weekend 7 Americans died in Afghanastan.....not a word in the press......this is President Obama's war now.....and what explanation is being given for those 7 Americans....some killed by folks we just trained......where is the demand for a scapegoat.....almost twice as many died this weekend......not a word in the main stream media.....disgraceful the politics which are played.....disgraceful.

nochain wrote:

Sal wrote:What exactly has been covered up, and to what end?

I see you fell asleep again. Too bad for you.

2seaoat wrote:If it leaves Obama's legacy in shambles,

Really......do you lack perception, or are you entirely ignorant that this was an active CIA operation, and since when does a president micro manage CIA operations.......are people getting all up in Arms when the scene depicted in Zero Dark Thirty actually happened and close 20 top intelligence people were killed or wounded.....did this go up to the president......no......this was tactical, and the response was tactical, and sometimes tactical responses may not make sense without understanding exactly how the CIA was deployed and what may have been a higher priority just a few miles away after the initial attack. This idea of a cover up is simply absurd. The president classified it as a terrorist attack in the Rose Garden....I heard him live on TV....If I knew it was a terrorist attack how f'ing stupid would a person have to be.........and to what end is a cover up going to accomplish anything........as I said earlier 7 Americans died this weekend and a couple were killed by Afghans who we trained.....not a word in the press because both sides of the aisles could care less if a few more Americans die....as long as they do not get cast as soft on defense and terrorism......absurd political dialogue.

2seaoat wrote:Whatever. It happened on Obama's watch,

Do you understand that the ambassador was an active cia operative, and prior to appointment as ambassador, he led critical coordinated efforts among the anti Mr K groups, and brought a ton of hurt on Mr. K.....he did not do this hiding in a castle with other folks fighting America's battle. This guy was the real deal hero who fought side by side with the rebels and had a huge following and respect, and he took exceptional risks every day and brought great success to America for dollars expended. Now you want some dumb Fu... politicians like Hillary and Obama to have line command over these guys....with oversight and multiple layers of paper shuffling for him to wipe his butt.......geez.......for political points the dogmatic political whores will sell this country down the river......it was a tactical screw up.....he was a warrior, and your solutions is to have SOS or the President at cabinet level micromanaging every bullet confrontation.....pure f'ing genius. The CIA has 10 fold success for this tactical screw up......and to think this is political fodder for impaired folks who went to school on a little bus.......yea....thats the ticket.

VectorMan wrote:

Billy the Kid wrote:

VectorMan wrote:

2seaoat wrote:If it leaves Obama's legacy in shambles,

Really......do you lack perception, or are you entirely ignorant that this was an active CIA operation, and since when does a president micro manage CIA operations.......are people getting all up in Arms when the scene depicted in Zero Dark Thirty actually happened and close 20 top intelligence people were killed or wounded.....did this go up to the president......no......this was tactical, and the response was tactical, and sometimes tactical responses may not make sense without understanding exactly how the CIA was deployed and what may have been a higher priority just a few miles away after the initial attack. This idea of a cover up is simply absurd. The president classified it as a terrorist attack in the Rose Garden....I heard him live on TV....If I knew it was a terrorist attack how f'ing stupid would a person have to be.........and to what end is a cover up going to accomplish anything........as I said earlier 7 Americans died this weekend and a couple were killed by Afghans who we trained.....not a word in the press because both sides of the aisles could care less if a few more Americans die....as long as they do not get cast as soft on defense and terrorism......absurd political dialogue.

Whatever. It happened on Obama's watch, then add the fact that he's a bald face liar, and it doesn't look good for him. The lying BS gets old quick. Obama's pants are surely on fire.

You switch the R's & D's around in this scandal and you'd see the libs foaming at the mouth for a pound of flesh from a republican president. The liberal media would have a hay day, while going orgasmic at the opportunity to eviscerate a republican.

....................................

Place and time. And don't make it the gay bars you cruise looking for another cock to suck.

Why do you keep hitting on me? I don't go out with forum troll assholes. Just sayin'................LOL

2seaoat wrote:If it leaves Obama's legacy in shambles,

Really......do you lack perception, or are you entirely ignorant that this was an active CIA operation, and since when does a president micro manage CIA operations.......are people getting all up in Arms when the scene depicted in Zero Dark Thirty actually happened and close 20 top intelligence people were killed or wounded.....did this go up to the president......no......this was tactical, and the response was tactical, and sometimes tactical responses may not make sense without understanding exactly how the CIA was deployed and what may have been a higher priority just a few miles away after the initial attack. This idea of a cover up is simply absurd. The president classified it as a terrorist attack in the Rose Garden....I heard him live on TV....If I knew it was a terrorist attack how f'ing stupid would a person have to be.........and to what end is a cover up going to accomplish anything........as I said earlier 7 Americans died this weekend and a couple were killed by Afghans who we trained.....not a word in the press because both sides of the aisles could care less if a few more Americans die....as long as they do not get cast as soft on defense and terrorism......absurd political dialogue.

Billy the Kid wrote:

VectorMan wrote:

Billy the Kid wrote:

VectorMan wrote:

2seaoat wrote:If it leaves Obama's legacy in shambles,

Really......do you lack perception, or are you entirely ignorant that this was an active CIA operation, and since when does a president micro manage CIA operations.......are people getting all up in Arms when the scene depicted in Zero Dark Thirty actually happened and close 20 top intelligence people were killed or wounded.....did this go up to the president......no......this was tactical, and the response was tactical, and sometimes tactical responses may not make sense without understanding exactly how the CIA was deployed and what may have been a higher priority just a few miles away after the initial attack. This idea of a cover up is simply absurd. The president classified it as a terrorist attack in the Rose Garden....I heard him live on TV....If I knew it was a terrorist attack how f'ing stupid would a person have to be.........and to what end is a cover up going to accomplish anything........as I said earlier 7 Americans died this weekend and a couple were killed by Afghans who we trained.....not a word in the press because both sides of the aisles could care less if a few more Americans die....as long as they do not get cast as soft on defense and terrorism......absurd political dialogue.

Whatever. It happened on Obama's watch, then add the fact that he's a bald face liar, and it doesn't look good for him. The lying BS gets old quick. Obama's pants are surely on fire.

You switch the R's & D's around in this scandal and you'd see the libs foaming at the mouth for a pound of flesh from a republican president. The liberal media would have a hay day, while going orgasmic at the opportunity to eviscerate a republican.

....................................

Place and time. And don't make it the gay bars you cruise looking for another cock to suck.

Why do you keep hitting on me? I don't go out with forum troll assholes. Just sayin'................LOL

............................................

Oh, trust me....you really wouldn't like me.

I'd hurt you, and leave a mark.

Billy the Kid wrote:

Sal wrote:There's absolutely nothing new here.

It's clear that the military could not deploy the assets necessary to repel the attack because there were serious logistical problems.

Everyone knows this except the knuckle-dragging, 20%er, FAUX News audience.

It looks pathetic that the GOP is trying to score cheap political points now, and if they still are talking about it in 2016 it will look even more pathetic.

Carry on.

VectorMan wrote:

Billy the Kid wrote:

....................................

Place and time. And don't make it the gay bars you cruise looking for another cock to suck.

Billy the Kid wrote:

VectorMan wrote:

Billy the Kid wrote:

....................................

Place and time. And don't make it the gay bars you cruise looking for another cock to suck.

Why do you keep hitting on me? I don't go out with forum troll assholes. Just sayin'................LOL

............................................

Oh, trust me....you really wouldn't like me.

I'd hurt you, and leave a mark.


Trust you? LOL! Yeah, about as far as I could throw your dumbass!

Wouldn't like you? You make it sound like it was some sort of possibility. LOL. Delusional much?

Before you could every get within reach of hurting me, you'd be wondering why you're laying face down in the dirt. It would hurt and leave more than a mere mark. Dickhead!