Pensacola Discussion Forum
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
zsomething wrote:
Some of the smartest, most badass people I know are female. Hey, know what? I am a feminist. And, oddly enough, I spend a lot of my time laughing. Often with women!
del.capslock wrote:RealLindaL wrote:
And frankly I gotta say I've never understood what was so great about kettle fried turkey anyway, Cajun or otherwise. Give me traditional roasted every time, but each to their own.
And there, in one sentence, is what annoys me about most women, the switch from a general topic--the danger of deep-frying turkeys indoors--to a personal one all about what they like or feel. Most women are shallow, materialistic and self-centered, obsessed with their emotions and their fucking feelings.
Women that can talk about objective reality without somehow bringing it back to them and their goddamn interior lives are rare indeed, "more valuable than rubies" according to Proverbs.
zsomething wrote:I've only had deep-fried turkey once (it was cooked at the local firehouse, oddly enough!) and I loved it. But, it wasn't so much better than roasted that I'd risk a house fire for it.
Last edited by RealLindaL on 6/7/2017, 2:16 am; edited 1 time in total
del.capslock wrote:RealLindaL wrote:
MULTIPLE KUDOS, Z! THIS IS BY FAR THE MOST INSIGHTFUL, RIGHT-ON-THE-MARK POST OF THE YEAR AND THEN SOME. WOW, A MAN AFTER MY OWN HEART. YOU GO, GUY!!
Allow me to point out that you had to get a guy to do it for you. Defense rests.
del.capslock wrote:And remember, a sense of humor, especially of the ironic variety, is a pretty good measure of intelligence.
RealLindaL wrote:
But then, you really shouldn't take yourself and your opinions so SERIOUSLY, now should you?
del.capslock wrote:RealLindaL wrote:
But then, you really shouldn't take yourself and your opinions so SERIOUSLY, now should you?
Answer me this, girly: Women read books written by men, but men don't read books written by women. Why do you think that is?
Well, considering your sense of humor and inability to detect the same, I'd guess the women were laughing just to be polite.
And remember, a sense of humor, especially of the ironic variety, is a pretty good measure of intelligence.
del.capslock wrote:RealLindaL wrote:
And frankly I gotta say I've never understood what was so great about kettle fried turkey anyway, Cajun or otherwise. Give me traditional roasted every time, but each to their own.
And there, in one sentence, is what annoys me about most women, the switch from a general topic--the danger of deep-frying turkeys indoors--to a personal one all about what they like or feel. Most women are shallow, materialistic and self-centered, obsessed with their emotions and their fucking feelings.
Women that can talk about objective reality without somehow bringing it back to them and their goddamn interior lives are rare indeed, "more valuable than rubies" according to Proverbs.
RealLindaL wrote:
And remember also, z, that one of del's favorite maneuvers is to spew his special brand of vitriol and then, when criticized for it, to back off by implying that he was merely being humorous -- and that YOU, the critic, are the one at fault for not recognizing humor when you see it.
Pretty good trick, eh? Almost worked on me the first time or so.
del.capslock wrote:If, instead of getting all emotional and howling like a banshee on a bad trip over my post about Hillary, you had spent five minutes doing a little research, you could have blown holes in my "losers should sit down and shut up" argument--Richard Milhouse Nixon being a prime example. DUH!
The argument was ridiculous on it's face, but you, in typical feminine fashion, instead of thinking logically and doing some work, set your own damn hair on fire and started shrieking like a wounded hyena.
If you had taken the time to read the Hitchens essay you would have realized it shredded my most recent argument. But no-o-o-o, you have to immediately start typing and screeching.
zsomething wrote:
I can't help it if I'm loquacious.
del.capslock wrote:RealLindaL wrote:
But then, you really shouldn't take yourself and your opinions so SERIOUSLY, now should you?
I don't take myself seriously, this is play. If you think anything written on a politics forum is of any consequence whatsoever, you're sadly mistaken. Nothing anyone says here is going to change anyone's mind--it serves only two purposes: to piss people off or make them laugh.
If, instead of getting all emotional and howling like a banshee on a bad trip over my post about Hillary, you had spent five minutes doing a little research, you could have blown holes in my "losers should sit down and shut up" argument--Richard Milhouse Nixon being a prime example. DUH!
The argument was ridiculous on it's face, but you, in typical feminine fashion, instead of thinking logically and doing some work, set your own damn hair on fire and started shrieking like a wounded hyena.
If you had taken the time to read the Hitchens essay you would have realized it shredded my most recent argument. But no-o-o-o, you have to immediately start typing and screeching.
Answer me this, girly: Women read books written by men, but men don't read books written by women. Why do you think that is?
Could it be because women can't write either? Of course, if your hysterical drivel is any example, the answer is obvious. Or, to put it more bluntly, your writing sucks. It reads an angry middle-school girl's ravings about the injustice of it all.
So, no, I don't take myself seriously. As a matter of fact, I'm ashamed of myself for trolling you, it's too goddamn easy.
Floridatexan wrote:
Just lifted this post from FB. It's in reference to a CNN report about the London Bridge attack, and Drumpf's tweet. This is so characteristic of a certain group of people:
Cnn and there storys!! I love how they keep Attacking him so dam much! Get over it hes our Potus and will remain our president, and there is not a dam thing yall could post that will change my mind and he still has my vote in 2020 along with the rest of the sleeping giant that has never voted and stepped up to the plate to ensure we dont end up with another Obama or worse. We are not going nowhere and we will be voting in 2020 again!!
Wordslinger wrote:Floridatexan wrote:
Just lifted this post from FB. It's in reference to a CNN report about the London Bridge attack, and Drumpf's tweet. This is so characteristic of a certain group of people:
Cnn and there storys!! I love how they keep Attacking him so dam much! Get over it hes our Potus and will remain our president, and there is not a dam thing yall could post that will change my mind and he still has my vote in 2020 along with the rest of the sleeping giant that has never voted and stepped up to the plate to ensure we dont end up with another Obama or worse. We are not going nowhere and we will be voting in 2020 again!!
"We are not going nowhere." This statement from your quote says it all. The writer is a perfect example of the knuckle-draggers who love the Trumpkin.
Wordslinger wrote:Floridatexan wrote:
Just lifted this post from FB. It's in reference to a CNN report about the London Bridge attack, and Drumpf's tweet. This is so characteristic of a certain group of people:
Cnn and there storys!! I love how they keep Attacking him so dam much! Get over it hes our Potus and will remain our president, and there is not a dam thing yall could post that will change my mind and he still has my vote in 2020 along with the rest of the sleeping giant that has never voted and stepped up to the plate to ensure we dont end up with another Obama or worse. We are not going nowhere and we will be voting in 2020 again!!
"We are not going nowhere." This statement from your quote says it all. The writer is a perfect example of the knuckle-draggers who love the Trumpkin.
del.capslock wrote:Wordslinger wrote:Floridatexan wrote:
Just lifted this post from FB. It's in reference to a CNN report about the London Bridge attack, and Drumpf's tweet. This is so characteristic of a certain group of people:
Cnn and there storys!! I love how they keep Attacking him so dam much! Get over it hes our Potus and will remain our president, and there is not a dam thing yall could post that will change my mind and he still has my vote in 2020 along with the rest of the sleeping giant that has never voted and stepped up to the plate to ensure we dont end up with another Obama or worse. We are not going nowhere and we will be voting in 2020 again!!
"We are not going nowhere." This statement from your quote says it all. The writer is a perfect example of the knuckle-draggers who love the Trumpkin.
Oh, c'mon, that's not real, it's satire. Did anyone check out the poster?
Floridatexan wrote:
Oh, c'mon, that's not real, it's satire. Did anyone check out the poster?
RealLindaL wrote:del.capslock wrote:If, instead of getting all emotional and howling like a banshee on a bad trip over my post about Hillary, you had spent five minutes doing a little research, you could have blown holes in my "losers should sit down and shut up" argument--Richard Milhouse Nixon being a prime example. DUH!
The argument was ridiculous on it's face, but you, in typical feminine fashion, instead of thinking logically and doing some work, set your own damn hair on fire and started shrieking like a wounded hyena.
If you had taken the time to read the Hitchens essay you would have realized it shredded my most recent argument. But no-o-o-o, you have to immediately start typing and screeching.
I assure you I don't know WTF you're talking about. Please indulge me by pointing out exactly where I screeched or shrieked or whatever about your post about Hillary or Hitchens or whomever. Perhaps in the fury of your delirium you have me confused with another of your favorite female whipping posts.
RealLindaL wrote:RealLindaL wrote:del.capslock wrote:If, instead of getting all emotional and howling like a banshee on a bad trip over my post about Hillary, you had spent five minutes doing a little research, you could have blown holes in my "losers should sit down and shut up" argument--Richard Milhouse Nixon being a prime example. DUH!
The argument was ridiculous on it's face, but you, in typical feminine fashion, instead of thinking logically and doing some work, set your own damn hair on fire and started shrieking like a wounded hyena.
If you had taken the time to read the Hitchens essay you would have realized it shredded my most recent argument. But no-o-o-o, you have to immediately start typing and screeching.
I assure you I don't know WTF you're talking about. Please indulge me by pointing out exactly where I screeched or shrieked or whatever about your post about Hillary or Hitchens or whomever. Perhaps in the fury of your delirium you have me confused with another of your favorite female whipping posts.
Second request.
Go to page : 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|