Pensacola Discussion Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

This is a forum based out of Pensacola Florida.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Hillary did Not Turn Over Emails Required by Law

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Go down  Message [Page 2 of 3]

Guest


Guest
2seaoat wrote:After years of political committee hearings to determine the same, please show me where any committee has found that Hillary lied about Libya.  I will patiently wait.

She has obviously lied about disclosing the relevant emails... if you've bothered to read this thread.

“With all due respect, the fact is, we had four dead Americans—was it because of a protest or because of guys out for a walk one night and decided to go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator.”

This is lie too... in one breath she says it doesn't matter what happened... then it needs to be figured out.

Which is it!? (Cue the rambling obfuscation.)

boards of FL

boards of FL
So from perusing the front page it appears that the republican party has some rock solid policy ideas to discuss during the upcoming election cycle. They are 1) More investigations into Benghazi, 2) Investigations into Clinton's email, 3) Opposition to gay marriage, and 4) Opposition to the removal of the rebel flag from state grounds.

Talk about a cocktail for prosperity! GOP 2016! GOP 2016, everyone!


_________________
I approve this message.

Markle

Markle
2seaoat wrote:becoming more apparent she has lied about Libya,

After years of political committee hearings to determine the same, please show me where any committee has found that Hillary lied about Libya.  I will patiently wait.

suggesting the messages were screened closely enough to determine which paragraphs were unfit to be seen by the public. …

So are you suggesting when those folks who screen for national security content that the should not be done "closely"...........too funny.

You're showing signs of giving up my good friend. Running out of excuses when so much is going South for the corrupt Clinton's and the semi-retired President Obama.

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI
PkrBum wrote:Bush4... Obama is bush3.

I heard Hillary likes Bush...

Markle

Markle
gatorfan wrote:
Floridatexan wrote:

Jebbie, like all the Bush family, is nothing but a crook.

Whatever, this thread is about HRC. Who cares about Bush except you? You are obsessed with that whole family......

Just following the talking points of the "pros" themselves, the notorious Clintons. When asked a question they obfuscate, stonewall and change the subject. Asked a question, they will answer a different question more to their liking. When asked again, they'll reply that question has already been covered... or is old news.

The Clinton's began sharpening their fine craft of lying way back in Arkansas.

2seaoat


You're showing signs of giving up my good friend. Running out of excuses when so much is going South for the corrupt Clinton's and the semi-retired President Obama.


I cannot argue with your logic....President Obama had a terrible week.

Markle

Markle
2seaoat wrote:You're showing signs of giving up my good friend. Running out of excuses when so much is going South for the corrupt Clinton's and the semi-retired President Obama.


I cannot argue with your logic....President Obama had a terrible week.

That's quite a stretch for you. It is nearly seven years, but acknowledging a week is a start.

TEOTWAWKI

TEOTWAWKI
Markle wrote:
2seaoat wrote:You're showing signs of giving up my good friend. Running out of excuses when so much is going South for the corrupt Clinton's and the semi-retired President Obama.


I cannot argue with your logic....President Obama had a terrible week.

That's quite a stretch for you.  It is nearly seven years, but acknowledging a week is a start.

He's being sarcastic Markle. He and Boards both think this is a great week for Obama.

The great divider has even driven a larger wedge in white / black relations though in my opinion.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan
2seaoat wrote:You're showing signs of giving up my good friend. Running out of excuses when so much is going South for the corrupt Clinton's and the semi-retired President Obama.


I cannot argue with your logic....President Obama had a terrible week.

cheers cheers cheers

Floridatexan

Floridatexan


Benghazi Investigation Spends Fortune to Harass Hillary Clinton

The Benghazi Select Committee moves slowly but spends quickly, exceeding the budget of the entire House Intelligence Committee

By Ari Rabin-Havt | 06/18/15 7:23am

On June 16th, the Benghazi Select Committee, meeting behind closed doors, questioned Hillary Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal for nine hours about emails he sent to the then-Secretary of State containing privately gathered intelligence reports from inside Libya.

The release of new emails from Mr. Blumenthal marked a milestone for the committee, characterized committee chairman, Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, as “noteworthy,” because no Congressional committee that “has previously looked into Benghazi or Libya has uncovered these memos.”

Yet there was no explanation as to how these emails contained any new insights or information about the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound and CIA base in Benghazi, Libya that resulted in the murders of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith, and CIA contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

Mr. Blumenthal himself noted “my testimony has shed no light on the events of Benghazi—nor could it—because I have no firsthand knowledge.”

This has been a consistent theme of the House’s investigation—a frenzy of media fireworks, with little substantive progress made in pursuit of the committee’s actual mandate. (The majority staff of the Benghazi Select Committee did not respond to requests for comment).

Led by a an 18-member Republican staff, whose full time employees are paid an average of $128,750 per year, the Benghazi Select Committee has proceeded at a plodding pace. Thus far, it has held only three hearings and by the end of this week will have interviewed just 29 witnesses. In comparison the Congressional investigation into the Iran Contra scandal lasted 10.5 months, during which time investigators conducted 500 interviews along with 40 days of public hearings.

The lack of progress is especially striking considering seven Congressional committees and a State Department Accountability Review Board already conducted inquires into the attack. Most recently the findings of the Republican led House Intelligence Committee found no evidence for many of the accusations hurled at President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other government officials.

Over 13 months the Benghazi Select Committee has spent more than $3,500,000, exceeding the budget of the entire House Intelligence Committee. This figure does not include significant expenditures made by the State Department and Defense Department to find and declassify material requested by the committee or the expense of witness travel for those who work for the government.

While exact dollar amounts spent by federal agencies are unavailable, details released about other declassification processes shed light on these costs. In March 2014 the Defense Department informed Democratic Rep. Adam Smith, they had spent “millions of dollars” and “thousands of man-hours to responding to numerous and often repetitive Congressional requests regarding Benghazi.” Currently the State Department has 12 full-time staff members paid between $63,700 and $150,000 reviewing Hillary Clinton’s emails “a process that could cost more than $1 million” according to the National Journal. The total cost for these document queries could run well into the eight figures. For example, the IRS spent $14 million responding to Congressional investigations into accusations it politicized the tax-exemption application process.

The Benghazi Select Committee has little to show for the significant expenditure—aside from a trail of unfulfilled promises by its Chairman. “We will have hearings in January, February and March,” Rep. Gowdy (R-SC) announced in December.

That never happened.

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 16: House Select Committee on BenghaziChairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) speaks to reporters. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC – JUNE 16: House Select Committee on Benghazi Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) speaks to reporters. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The committee held a single hearing in January, focused on berating State Department legislative liaison Joel Rubin about the production of documents. CIA representative Neil Higgins escaped with a mild talking to.

Two days after his December announcement, Rep. Gowdy told Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren the committee would hold a hearing in January to explore why the State Department was in Benghazi. That hearing never occurred.

In February, Rep. Gowdy sent a letter to the committee’s ranking Democratic member Elijah Cummings (D-Md) informing him that “beginning as early as April I intend to start interviewing” a list of twenty prominent members of the Obama administration including Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey, former White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, Clinton State Department Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills among others.

According to a Democrat committee staff member, “The committee has yet to interview a single person on Gowdy’s list.”

In April, Gowdy again appeared on Van Susteren’s show claiming, “we’re doing four witness interviews a week, whereas we were doing two.”

A Democratic committee, who requested anonymity, aide told the Observer, “The Select Committee has never done four interviews a week.”

Rep. Gowdy now states the committee will continue its work into 2016 raising its cost to taxpayers to more than $6,000,000, casting his inaction as the result of the Obama administration’s slow pace at producing requested documents, a questionable premise. Rep. Gowdy began receiving documents in August. The committee did not make its first request to the State Department until mid-November, six months after beginning its work. His document request to the Department of Defense was only delivered in early April of this year.

Rep. Gowdy has proceeded in a similar vein while attempting to schedule Hillary Clinton’s appearance before the committee. In early September Stop Hillary PAC, which was “created for one reason only—to ensure Hillary Clinton never becomes President of the United States,” delivered a petition with 264,000 signatures demanding Gowdy call the Secretary of State to testify.

The next day, he asked Rep. Cummings to reach out to Ms. Clinton on his “behalf to determine whether she would testify.” On a November 12 phone call with majority and minority committee staff, Clinton’s team confirmed she would be willing to testify before the committee in December. Rep. Gowdy recently moved the goal posts, asking she appear for a private transcribed interview, as opposed to a public hearing.

Recently, the committee has shifted some of its focus from investigating the actual attack in Benghazi, to reviewing policy decisions made by Hillary Clinton regarding Libya more than nineteen months prior to the attack. Rep. Gowdy, confirmed this to Politico, which reported that “broader problems with the Obama administration’s Libya policy—could prove to be an ugly albatross weighing on the Clinton campaign.”

Rep. Cummings believes these efforts are part of “a fishing expedition for anything they can use against Secretary Clinton in her presidential campaign.” He continued, “After a full year, it now seems obvious that this investigation is being dragged out in order to attack Secretary Clinton and her campaign for president—squandering millions of taxpayer dollars in the process.”

In May of 2014 it was reported that Republicans worried that if they created a Benghazi Select Committee it would fail to produce tangible results. “Investigate and find nothing new, and the committee looks like a bunch of tin-hatted obsessives,” wrote Eli Lake. One House member told Lake, “This could be a rabbit hole.”

It has turned out to be an extremely deep one.





Read more at http://observer.com/2015/06/sticker-shock-calculating-the-benghazi-investigations-huge-price-tag/#ixzz3edi0ZOBO
Follow us: @newyorkobserver on Twitter | newyorkobserver on Facebook

******************

Nothing but a partisan witch hunt being drawn out to discredit Hillary Clinton in the coming election...and if possible to somehow tie President Obama into the charade. Gowdy is like a rabid ferret moving at a snail's pace, wasting time and money on an "investigation" that leads nowhere...except to implant the appearance of guilt into the minds of the already misinformed electorate. 9/11...what are the odds?


Guest


Guest
She brought this upon herself when she lied... not only to all of us but directly to the families.

It's obvious that you don't give a damn when your dear leaders lie... we get it.

Sal

Sal
Hillary 54
Jeb 41

Hillary 56
Rubio 39

Hillary 56
Christie 37

Hillary 59
Trump 34

Hillary 57
Walker 38


http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2015/images/06/30/trumpbushclinton.pdf

Hillary did Not Turn Over Emails Required by Law - Page 2 7a2add73451638e1c8eb8a617f7a58228bfaa041017bf0c13b50871c27f54f92

Markle

Markle
TEOTWAWKI wrote:
PkrBum wrote:Bush4... Obama is bush3.

I heard Hillary likes Bush...

Hillary did Not Turn Over Emails Required by Law - Page 2 AnimatedDogLaughing

Sal

Sal
Markle wrote:
TEOTWAWKI wrote:
PkrBum wrote:Bush4... Obama is bush3.

I heard Hillary likes Bush...

Hillary did Not Turn Over Emails Required by Law - Page 2 AnimatedDogLaughing

TEOTWAWKI wrote:

Yes a double entendre, ha ha it is to laugh, ho ho so funny...zzzzzzzzz

Guest


Guest
http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2015/07/hillary-clinton-emails-veep-julia-louis-dreyfus

VectorMan

VectorMan
It's one thing to make an honest mistake and it's another when you're a known lying corrupt bitch.

Look up lying corrupt bitch in the dictionary and you'll find a picture of HRC. LOL

2seaoat


Look up lying corrupt bitch in the dictionary


I did......it said Butchmeup.

Floridatexan

Floridatexan
2seaoat wrote:Look up lying corrupt bitch in the dictionary


I did......it said Butchmeup.

Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil Twisted Evil

Markle

Markle
Sal wrote:Hillary 54
Jeb 41

Hillary 56
Rubio 39

Hillary 56
Christie 37

Hillary 59
Trump 34

Hillary 57
Walker 38


http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2015/images/06/30/trumpbushclinton.pdf

Hillary did Not Turn Over Emails Required by Law - Page 2 7a2add73451638e1c8eb8a617f7a58228bfaa041017bf0c13b50871c27f54f92

Who was leading in the Democrat Primary Polls July of 2007?

Sal

Sal
Markle wrote:

Who was leading in the Democrat Primary Polls July of 2007?

"President Bernie" sound good to you?

Guest


Guest
Sal wrote:
Markle wrote:

Who was leading in the Democrat Primary Polls July of 2007?

"President Bernie" sound good to you?

We could find out exactly how popular socialism is in the USA.

Sal

Sal
Seems to me they like it plenty when they find out what it is.

Markle

Markle
Sal wrote:
Markle wrote:

Who was leading in the Democrat Primary Polls July of 2007?

"President Bernie" sound good to you?

Hillary did Not Turn Over Emails Required by Law - Page 2 HystericallyLaughingmanandboy

Guest


Guest
Though she pretend to want the process expedited... she didn't turn over a digital copy. Each email was printed out on paper. No reason was given. I would suspect so that alterations could not be detected in the files. Just more transparency.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/state-department-wont-release-hillary-clintons-emails-until-january-2016-118078.html#ixzz3aY7TwAJW

gatorfan


PkrBum wrote:Though she pretend to want the process expedited... she didn't turn over a digital copy. Each email was printed out on paper. No reason was given. I would suspect so that alterations could not be detected in the files. Just more transparency.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/state-department-wont-release-hillary-clintons-emails-until-january-2016-118078.html#ixzz3aY7TwAJW

I suppose just to put all this to rest Obama could grow some spine and direct the State Dept to turn over everything immediately. Curious.......

Sponsored content


Back to top  Message [Page 2 of 3]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum