CNN poll - ideal candidate for 2016 is anti-Obama

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/22/cnn-poll-voters-ideal-2016-candidate-an-anti-obama/

KarlRove wrote:http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/22/cnn-poll-voters-ideal-2016-candidate-an-anti-obama/

It is important to note that voters weren’t asked about any specific policies they wanted reversed. Far more troubling for Obama’s thoughts about his legacy, voters simply generally want to scrap his policies. In other words, their default position is that, from a national policy perspective, the Obama years ought to be simply erased.

Scraping 6 years of policies is cutting quite a wide swath. It sounds to me as if people are reacting in a knee jerk way to the question and if asked about individual accomplishments they might give different answers. It is too broad a statement to be worth much notice although it is a great topic for a forum such as this because it hits a lot of hot buttons for everyone, lol.

KarlRove wrote:http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/22/cnn-poll-voters-ideal-2016-candidate-an-anti-obama/

If you read the poll and see the answers, you'll realize no one other than Jeb Bush of the potential republican candidate meets the minimal requirements stated by those who were polled. 

And Hillary will beat him. 

In my view, either one of these archaic candidates means America loses.

That makes Hillary the ideal candidate. She ran against Obama. She was the anti Obama candidate. Hillary must be destined.........

othershoe1030 wrote:

KarlRove wrote:http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/22/cnn-poll-voters-ideal-2016-candidate-an-anti-obama/

It is important to note that voters weren’t asked about any specific policies they wanted reversed. Far more troubling for Obama’s thoughts about his legacy, voters simply generally want to scrap his policies. In other words, their default position is that, from a national policy perspective, the Obama years ought to be simply erased.

Scraping 6 years of policies is cutting quite a wide swath. It sounds to me as if people are reacting in a knee jerk way to the question and if asked about individual accomplishments they might give different answers. It is too broad a statement to be worth much notice although it is a great topic for a forum such as this because it hits a lot of hot buttons for everyone, lol.

What's important to NOTE is people don't want another Obama. They want the opposite...ya know a freakin' leader from the front, not the back.

KarlRove wrote:

othershoe1030 wrote:

KarlRove wrote:http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/03/22/cnn-poll-voters-ideal-2016-candidate-an-anti-obama/

It is important to note that voters weren’t asked about any specific policies they wanted reversed. Far more troubling for Obama’s thoughts about his legacy, voters simply generally want to scrap his policies. In other words, their default position is that, from a national policy perspective, the Obama years ought to be simply erased.

Scraping 6 years of policies is cutting quite a wide swath. It sounds to me as if people are reacting in a knee jerk way to the question and if asked about individual accomplishments they might give different answers. It is too broad a statement to be worth much notice although it is a great topic for a forum such as this because it hits a lot of hot buttons for everyone, lol.

What's important to NOTE is people don't want another Obama. They want the opposite...ya know a freakin' leader from the front, not the back.

Not quite, that's only true for Republicans.

So who do you support and why?

by 2seaoat Yesterday at 8:56 pm
That makes Hillary the ideal candidate. She ran against Obama. She was the anti Obama candidate. Hillary must be destined.........
---------
Hillary and Obama are one in the same. They
Are the DINOs.

It's like this. Obama is a communist muslim atheist queer lover who has ruined our country.
It doesn't matter which republican replaces him. Just getting rid of him will make this country great again regardless of which republican it is.
And if the country don't get great again, it will be all the fault of obama and democrats.

ideal candidate for 2016 is anti-Obama

So the ideal candidate for 2016 would be a white woman??

I don't think you're gonna like where this is headed, Poindexter.

Bush and Cheney won the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and installed democracy in the two countries.
Obama came along and sided up with the enemy and lost the wars Bush and Cheney had won. He undid all the democracy and installed communism, atheism, gay marriage and sharia law.

Any republican president will be a strong commander-in-chief like Ronald Reagan and will win all the wars again like Reagan did. A republican will install democracy in the middle east and get rid of all the communism and gay marriage Obama created. And once again America will be the greatest country on Earth.

KarlRove wrote:by 2seaoat Yesterday at 8:56 pm
That makes Hillary the ideal candidate. She ran against Obama. She was the anti Obama candidate. Hillary must be destined.........
---------
Hillary and Obama are one in the same. They
Are the DINOs.

Still wondering who you would vote for and why?